Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-6kn8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T18:03:24.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lindelöf locales and realcompactness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

J. Madden  and
J. Vermeer
J. Madden
Affiliation:
University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, U.S.A.
J. Vermeer
Affiliation:
University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We show that a locale possesses the localic analogue of the property of realcompactness if and only if it is regular Lindelöf. Thus, the localic version of the Hewitt real-compactification, originally defined by G.Reynolds using σ-frames, is the regular Lindelöf reflection. An immediate consequence is that a space is realcompact if and only if it is the point space of a regular Lindelöf local (3·2). We point out a nice analogy between a theorem of Reynolds and Stone's classical representation theorem for boolean algebras. Finally, we show that the quasi-F cover of a compact Hausdorff space is the Stone–čech compactifications of the smallest dense Lindelöf sublocale.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 99 , Issue 3 , May 1986 , pp. 473 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1]Banaschewski, B. and Mulvey, C. J.. Stone čech compactification of locales. I. Houston J. Math. 6 (1980), 301–312.Google Scholar
[2]Dashiell, F., Hager, A. and Henriksen, M.. Order-Cauchy completions of rings of continuous functions. Canad. J. Math. 32 (1980), 657–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Van Douwen, E. K. and Hao-Xuan, Zhou. The number of cozero sets is an ω-power. (Preprint.)Google Scholar
[4]Dowker, C. H. and Strauss, D.. Sums in the category of frames. Houston J. Math. 3 (1976), 17–32.Google Scholar
[5]Engelking, R.. General Topology. (Warsaw, 1977.)Google Scholar
[6]Gilmour, C. R. A.. Realcompact spaces and regular σ-frames. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 96 (1984), 73–79.Google Scholar
[7]Henriksen, M., Vermeer, J. and Woods, R. G.. Quase-f covers of Tychonoff spaces. (To appear.)Google Scholar
[8]Isbell, J. R.. Atomless parts of spaces. Math. Scand. 31 (1972), 5–32.Google Scholar
[9]Isbell, J. R.. Review of [10]. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 11 (1984), 389–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Johnstone, P. T.. Stone Spaces. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Math. No. 3 (Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
[11]Reynolds, G.. On the spectrum of a real representable ring. In Application of Sheaves, Lecture Notes in Math. vol. 753 (Springer-Verlag, 1979), 595–611.Google Scholar
[12]Vermeer, J.. The smallest basically disconnected preimage of a space. Topology Appl. 17 (1984), 217–232.Google Scholar