Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-glrdx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T23:46:48.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strongly plus-amphicheiral knots are algebraically slice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

D. D. Long
D. D. Long
Affiliation:
St John's College, Cambridge†
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A classical knot in S3 is said to be slice if it is the boundary of a smooth (or PL locally unknotted) disc in B4. The first obstructions to sliceness were introduced in [3] (the Alexander polynomial is of the form f(t). f(t−1)) and [7] (the signature is zero). Levine defined the notion of algebraically slice knot in [5]. This property implies the first two obstructions vanish.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 95 , Issue 2 , March 1984 , pp. 309 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1]Conway, J. H.. An enumeration of knots and links. In Computational Problems in Abstract Algebra (Pergamon Press, 1969), pp. 329–358.Google Scholar
[2]Hartley, R. and Kawauchi, A.. Polynomials of amphicheiral knots. Math. Ann. 243 (1979), 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Fox, R. H. and Milnor, J. W.. Singularities of 2-spheres in 4-space and cobordism of knots. Osaka J. Math. 3 (1966), 257–267.Google Scholar
[4]Livingston, C.. Knots which are not concordant to their reverse. (Preprint.)Google Scholar
[5]Levine, J.. Knot cobordism groups in codimension two. Comment. Math. Helv. 44 (1969), 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Milnor, J. W.. Infinite cyclic coverings. In Conference on the Topology of Manifolds (Prindle, Weber and Schmidt, 1968), pp. 115–133.Google Scholar
[7]Murasugi, K.. On a certain numerical invariant of link types. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 117 (1965), 387–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar