Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-pnlb5 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-10-31T00:49:27.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On nearly uniformly convex and k-uniformly convex spaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

V. I. Istrăt‚escu  and
J. R. Partington
V. I. Istrăt‚escu
Affiliation:
Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge
J. R. Partington
Affiliation:
Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this note we prove that every nearly uniformly convex space has normal structure and that K-uniformly convex spaces are super-reflexive.

We recall [1] that a Banach space is said to be Kadec–Klee if whenever xn → x weakly and ∥n∥ = ∥x∥ = 1 for all n then ∥xn −x∥ → 0. The stronger notions of nearly uniformly convex spaces and uniformly Kadec–Klee spaces were introduced by R. Huff in [1]. For the reader's convenience we recall them here.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 95 , Issue 2 , March 1984 , pp. 325 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1]Huff, R.Banach spaces which are nearly uniformly convex. Rocky Mountain J. Math. 10 (1980), 743–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Istrăt‚escu, V. I.Fixed Point Theory: An Introduction. (D. Reidel, 1981.)Google Scholar
[3]Istrăt‚escu, V. I.Strict Convexity and Complex Strict Convexity, Theory and Applications. Lecture Notes in Math. (M. Dekker, 1983).Google Scholar
[4]James, R. C. and Schäffer, J. J.Super-reflexivity and the girth of spheres. Israel J. Math. 11 (1972), 398–404.Google Scholar
[5]Partington, J. R.On nearly uniformly convex Banach spaces. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 93 (1983), 127–129.Google Scholar