Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
The object of this paper is to complete the proof of the
Theorem. Let P(√d) be the quadratic field of discriminant d > 0. Then Euclid's algorithm does not hold in P(√d) if d is sufficiently large.
† Kungl. Fysiogr. Sällskapeti Lund Förhandlingar, 5 (1935), 5.Google Scholar
‡ Journal für Math. 174 (1936), 192–205.Google Scholar
§ Journal London Math. Soc. 13 (1938), 3–8.Google Scholar
∥ We say that u is a quadratic residue mod v in the naive sense, if the congruence y 2 ≡ u (mod v) has a solution.
†  Vinogradov, , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.  29 (1927), 218–26Google Scholar proved  His proof is easily generalized to obtain Lemma 3. See also Erdös and Ko, loc. cit. Lemma 3.
 His proof is easily generalized to obtain Lemma 3. See also Erdös and Ko, loc. cit. Lemma 3.
† It may, of course, happen that a 1 and a 2 are both residues.