Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-5jtmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-23T09:23:51.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calculators and Computer Algebra Systems – Their Use in Mathematics Examinations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2025

Martin Taylor
Martin Taylor*
Affiliation:
Associated Examining Board, Stag Hill House, Guildford, Surrey GU2 5XJ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Over the last twenty years or so there have been numerous trials and curriculum development exercises in Mathematics involving the use of calculators of various levels of sophistication; more recently, work has been carried out on the use of computer algebra systems (CASs), which perform much of the routine algebra and calculus currently examined at A-level. At the same time, there has been a move in certain examinations to allow candidates access to reference materials (such as set texts) or other forms of support. This paper provides an overview of these developments together with their consequences and considers the possible effects on Mathematics examinations of affordable hand-held devices which run CASs. It has been written largely with regard to A-level, although much of it is also relevant to other examinations.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Mathematical Gazette , Volume 79 , Issue 484 , March 1995 , pp. 68 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © The Mathematical Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Francis, J., A case for open book examinations, Educational Review 34 (1982) pp. 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Heywood, J., Assessment in Higher Education (Wiley) (1988).Google Scholar
3. Rowland, T., Inadmissible evidence, Micromath Vol. 8 No. 1 (1992) pp. 27–28.Google Scholar
4. Shuard, H., Walsh, A., Goodwin, J. and Worcester, V. Calculation, Children and Mathematics (Simon and Schuster) (1991).Google Scholar
5. Cockcroft, W.H., Mathematics Counts: the report on the Committee of Inquiry into the teaching of Mathematics in schools (HMSO) (1982).Google Scholar
6. Fey, J.T., Technology and Mathematics Education: a survey of recent developments and important problems, Educational Studies in Mathematics Vol. 20 (1989) pp. 237–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Duffin, J., CAN we change? Micromath Vol. 8 No. 1 (1992) pp. 23–25.Google Scholar
8. Costello, J., Teaching and learning Mathematics 11–16 (Routledge) (1991).Google Scholar
9. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate, Mathematics from 5 to 16 (HMSO) (1985).Google Scholar
10. Department of Education and Science, Mathematics in the National Curriculum (HMSO) (1991).Google Scholar
11. Costello, J., A failed revolution Micromath Vol. 8 No. 1 (1992) pp. 21–23.Google Scholar
12. Scottish Examination Board, Scottish Certificate of Education, Mathematics (revised) on the Higher Grade: notes of clarification on amendment to rubric of Papers I and II for examinations in and after 1993 (1992)Google Scholar
13. Ruthven, K., Advanced calculators and Advanced-level Mathematics, The Mathematical Gazette Vol. 75 No. 471 (1991) pp. 48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Ruthven, K., The influence of graphic calculator use on translation from graphic to symbolic forms, Educational Studies in Mathematics Vol. 21, (1990) pp. 431–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Etchells, T., Computer algebra systems and students’ understanding of the Riemann Integral, in Etchells, T. and Monaghan, J. (eds) Computer Algebra Systems in the Classroom (Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds) (1993).Google Scholar
16. Etchells, T., The fall and rise of the chain rule, The Mathematical Gazette Vol. 78 No. 482 (1994) pp. 188–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Kutzler, B., DERIVE - The future of teaching Mathematics The International DERIVE Journal, Vol. 1 No. 1 (1994) pp. 37–55.Google Scholar
18. Association of Teachers of Mathematics, Algebra at A-level - the potential impact of computer algebra systems (1994).Google Scholar
19. The Mathematical Association, Computers in the Mathematics curriculum (1992).Google Scholar
20. Etchells, T. and Monaghan, J., Handheld technology: assessment issues (In press)(1994)Google Scholar
21. Dovey, P., Gommersall, D. and Rothery, A., Deriving exam solutions, Micromath Vol. 9 No. 3 (1993) pp. 39–42.Google Scholar
22. French, D., Automated algebra: what is there left to learn? Micromath Vol. 9 No. 3 (1993) pp. 18–19.Google Scholar
23. Ahmed, A., Oldknow, A., Plater, C., Sulke, F., Taylor, M. and Williams, H., Flexible learning approaches in Sixth Form Mathematics: report of the first phase The Mathematics Centre, West Sussex Institute of Higher Education (1990).Google Scholar
24. Keeves, J.P. (ed), Educational research, methodology and measurement: an international handbook (Pergamon) (1988).Google Scholar
25. Blume, G. and Schoen, H., Mathematical problem-solving performances of eighth-grade programmers and non-programmers, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 19 (1988) pp. 142–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Thomas, G., Some dangers in the use of investigations in Mathematics teaching, Teaching Mathematics and its Applications Vol. 11 No. 2 (1992) pp. 75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. School Examinations and Assessment Council, GCE Advanced and Advanced Supplementary Examinations: Subject Core for Mathematics (1993).Google Scholar