Introduction
In recent years the Group III nitride materials have generated tremendous interest due to their potential applications in high-efficiency LEDs (light-emitting diodes) and blue lasers. For device structures, high quality GaN and relative ternary alloy films and heterostructures are needed. The group III nitrides are materials with non-centrosymmetrical crystal structure, therefore, Ga-(Al-) polar or N-polar layers can be grown. Polarity of III-V nitride thin films is known to be an important factor in determining the surface roughness and properties of the as-grown material. Results of efforts of many groups on the polarity study are well reviewed by Hellman [Reference Hellman1]. The primary focus of our investigations was the absolute polarity determination and correlations between the polarity and extended defects present in the GaN films grown on sapphire. The polarity of the layers was traditionally determined by convergent beam electron diffraction (CBED) [Reference Ponce, Van de Walle and Northrup2-Reference Liliental-Weber, Ruvimov, Kisielowski, Chen, Swider, Washburn, Newman, Gassamann, Liu, Schloss, Weber, Grzegory, Bockowski, Jun, Suski, Pakula, Baranowski, Porowski, Amano, Akasaki, Ponce, Dupuis, Nakamura and Edmond4] and multiple dark field transmission electron microscopy (TEM) techniques [Reference Serneels, Snykers, Delavignette, Gevers and Amelinckx5-Reference Romano, Northrup and O’Keefe6]. However, CBED method can only be applied for perfect crystals of considerable volume, while the GaN films often contain thin (of the order of 10 nm in diameter) pipe-like domains. The multiple dark field TEM imaging [Reference Serneels, Snykers, Delavignette, Gevers and Amelinckx5] allows to determine relative, not absolute polarity of such domains. Here we used a new method of polarity determination based on the different dependency of intensity vs. thickness for the specific diffracted beams revealing the non-centrosymmetric nature of the crystal. This allows the study of polarity for very thin, nanometer sized domains in GaN and other wurtzite structures as well as unambiguous absolute determination of film polarity.
Experimental
The GaN films in our study were grown on (0001) sapphire by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) technique at temperatures around 1000 °C. The details of the growth are reported elsewhere [Reference Kung, Saxler, Walker, Zhang, Lavado, Kim, Razeghi, Ponce, Moustakas, Akasaki and Monemar7]. The films were found to be device-quality single-crystal and showed only excitonic bands in our photoluminescence studies [Reference Dovidenko, Oktyabrsky, Narayan, Joshkin and Razeghi8]. Typical epitaxial relationships of (0001)GaN|| (0001)sap , and [
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
Multiple dark field technique was used to establish the inversion character of thin pipe-like domains observed in some samples. However, we were primarily interested in determining the absolute polarity of the layers and the inversion domains (IDs). For non-centrosymmetric crystal structures the opposite diffracted beams (those reflections of the diffraction pattern which reveal the non-centrosymmetry of the crystal structure) can have an order of magnitude difference in intensity due to dynamic (multiple) diffraction effects. Since the intensity of diffracted beams is also a function of a sample thickness, there is a unique distribution of intensity vs. thickness for each diffracted beam. The procedure to determine the absolute polarity of the films was to first calculate the intensities of different diffracted beams as a function of crystal thickness by multislice calculations. Experimental CBED patterns of different regions of GaN films in [1
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
Results and Discussion
According to our previous results [Reference Dovidenko, Oktyabrsky, Narayan, Joshkin and Razeghi8, Reference Dovidenko, Oktyabrsky and Narayan10] two types of microstructure were found to be characteristic of MOCVD grown GaN films. Density of about 109 cm−2 was found to be typical for all extended defects (inversion domain boundaries, pure edge, mixed and screw dislocations) present in the films of the first type (A). The films of the second type (B) were found to be free from inversion domains and with low (down to 107 cm−2) density of screw and mixed type dislocations. Here low-angle tilt sub-grain boundaries and associated with them threading edge dislocations (density ∼ 1010 cm−2 ) were found to be the main defects.
Fig. 1 (a) shows the typical cross-sectional TEM image of an A-type GaN film grown on basal plane of sapphire. The image was taken under
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn03.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary-alt:20170731080447-91756-mediumThumb-S109257830000332X_fig1g.jpg?pub-status=live)
Fig. 1 (a) Weak beam dark field cross-sectional TEM image of a GaN film grown on sapphire. The arrow indicates the inversion domain. The image is taken near the [11
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
(b) Schematic representation of a GaN crystal structure viewed in [11
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary-alt:20170731080447-89558-mediumThumb-S109257830000332X_fig2g.jpg?pub-status=live)
Fig. 2. Calculated intensities (arbitrary units) of <0002> and <10
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
We studied the polarity of many device-quality films grown by MOCVD and it was found that the layers had Ga-polarity (according to schematic representation shown in the Fig. 1 (b)). In each case, we took the HRTEM images along with the CBEDs in order to determine the thickness of the sample and made sure that it was below the thickness (∼ 140 Å) where dynamic diffraction could give confusing results. As we have previously found, the samples containing IDs have Ga-face polarity. The CBED patterns and HRTEM images were obtained for adjacent areas inside and outside of the pipe-like domains. The results of our study are presented in Fig. 3. The small probe (about 3 nm in diameter) was used to obtain CBEDs outside (Fig. 3, a) and inside (Fig. 3, b) of the inversion domain shown in Fig. 3 (c). The intensity of one <0002> type CBED disk in matrix diffraction pattern is much higher than that of the opposite disk. The comparison of the experimental HRTEM images taken in this particular place of the sample with results of our simulations [Reference Dovidenko, Oktyabrsky, Narayan and Razeghi9] allowed us to estimate the thickness of the GaN layer to be about 70-90 Å. From the graph in Fig. 2 (a) for this thickness region, we can see that the intensity of 0002 beam is much stronger than that of 000
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary-alt:20170731080447-41724-mediumThumb-S109257830000332X_fig3g.jpg?pub-status=live)
Fig. 3. CBED patterns obtained from (a) the GaN matrix; and (b) the inversion domain ID. The TEM image of the corresponding area of the cross-sectional GaN sample is shown in (c). Positions of the electron beam for taking the CBEDs are shown by circles. White arrow indicates the direction of film growth.
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary-alt:20170731080447-04851-mediumThumb-S109257830000332X_fig4g.jpg?pub-status=live)
Fig. 4. Simulated convergent beam electron diffraction pattern obtained for 80 Å thickness of the [1
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
In accordance with our previous studies [Reference Dovidenko, Oktyabrsky, Narayan, Joshkin and Razeghi8, Reference Dovidenko, Oktyabrsky and Narayan10] in unipolar (Ga-polar) films the major defects were found to be edge dislocations with the Burgers vector
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn04.gif?pub-status=live)
Conclusions
We have established the predominance of the Ga-polarity studying device-quality MOCVD films. The films are either unipolar, or contain thin N-polar pipe-like domains with the diameter of 10 - 30 nm. The polarity of thin areas of the III-V nitride samples has been determined by studying the distribution of intensities of the diffraction in high-symmetry CBED patterns. The CBED patterns lose inversion symmetry due to dynamic scattering and become in fact fingerprints of the structure carrying information about crystal polarity. The thickness of the sample can be estimated by comparing the experimental HRTEM images taken at the same places as CBEDs with results of multislice image simulations. The polarity of the layers was correlated with the surface roughness. The Ga-face polar films containing IDs showed high (about 109 cm−2 ) density of edge as well as screw dislocations randomly distributed throughout the layer, while the unipolar (Ga-polar) films had predominantly b=1/3[11
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000332X:S109257830000332X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)