Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mnl9s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-25T18:59:14.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Accounts for the German Labor Market Miracle? A Structural VAR Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2022

Mathias Klein  and
Stefan Schiman
Mathias Klein
Affiliation:
Sveriges Riksbank, Monetary Policy Department–Research, SE-10337 Stockholm, Sweden
Stefan Schiman*
Affiliation:
Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO), Arsenal 20, A-1030 Wien, Austria
*
*Corresponding author. Email: stefan.schiman@wifo.ac.at
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the driving forces behind the strong decline in German unemployment from 2005 onwards and the exceptionally small increase during the Great Recession. Structural vector autoregressions (VARs) with sign restrictions show that wage moderation in the aftermath of labor market reforms was the dominant factor of the unemployment decline, and that improved matching and shrinking labor supply also contributed to it. The adjustment to business cycle shocks (Great Recession), on the other hand, is to a large extent borne by the intensive margin, which can be explained by institutional aspects of the German labor market.

Keywords

German labor market miraclestructural VARsign restrictionsE24E32

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , April 2023 , pp. 794 - 825
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

d’Albis, H., Boubtane, E., and Coulibaly, D. (2021). Demographic changes and the labor income share. European Economic Review 131, 103614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balleer, A., Gehrke, B., Lechthaler, W., and Merkl, C. (2016). Does short-time work save jobs? A business cycle analysis. European Economic Review 84, 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.05.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, A. and King, I. (2018). The Hartz reforms, the German miracle, and labor reallocation. European Economic Review 103, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.12.010.Google Scholar
Baumeister, C. and Hamilton, J. D. (2015). Sign restrictions, structural vector autoregressions, and useful prior information. Econometrica 83(5), 1963–1999. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA12356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettendorf, T. and Leon-Ledesma, M. A. (2019). German wage moderation and European imbalances: Feeding the global VAR with theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 51(2–3), 617–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeri, T. and Bruecker, H. (2011). Short-time work benefits revisited: Some lessons from the Great Recession. Economic Policy 26(68), 697–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2011.271.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boysen-Hogrefe, J. and Groll, D. (2010). The German labour market miracle. National Institute Economic Review 214(1), R38–R50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027950110389760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, J. and Kügler, A. (2019). Labor market reforms: An evaluation of the Hartz policies in Germany. European Economic Review 113, 108–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenke, K. (2010). Fünf Jahre Hartz IV: Das Problem ist nicht die Arbeitsmoral. DIW Wochenbericht 77(6), 2–13. https://www.diw.de/sixcms/detail.php?id=diw_01.c.454234.de.Google Scholar
Brey, B. and Hertweck, M. S. (2020). The extension of short-time work schemes during the Great Recession: A story of success? Macroeconomic Dynamics 24(2), 360–402. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100518000263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burda, M. C. and Hunt, J. (2011). What explains the German labor market miracle in the Great Recession? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Spring 2011, 273–335. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41228527.Google Scholar
Burda, M. C. and Seele, S. (2016). No role for the Hartz reforms? Demand and supply factors in the German labor market, 1993–2014. SFB 649 Discussion Paper DP2016-010, Humboldt University, Collaborative Research Center 649. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2016-010.Google Scholar
Cacciatore, M., Fiori, G., and Traum, N. (2020). Hours and employment over the business cycle: A structural analysis. Review of Economic Dynamics 35, 240–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2019.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canova, F. and Paustian, M. (2011). Business cycle measurement with some theory. Journal of Monetary Economics 58(4), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2011.07.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrillo-Tudela, C., Launov, A., and Robin, J.-M. (2021). The fall in German unemployment: A flow analysis. European Economic Review 132, 103658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R., Meyer, M., and Schott, I. (2017). The employment and output effects of short-time work in Germany. Working Paper 23688, National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w23688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dustmann, C., Fitzenberger, B., Schönberg, U., and Spitz-Oener, A. (2014). From sick man of Europe to economic superstar: Germany’s resurgent economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives 28(1), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.1.167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahr, R. and Sunde, U. (2009). Did the Hartz reforms speed-up the matching process? A macro-evaluation using empirical matching functions. German Economic Review 10(3), 284–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0475.2008.00457.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foroni, C., Furlanetto, F., and Lepetit, A. (2018). Labor supply factors and economic fluctuations. International Economic Review 59(3), 1491–1510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iere.12311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, M. (2016). Unemployment decline in East Germany: The role of demography. Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft 36(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-016-0106-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furlanetto, F. and Groshenny, N. (2016). Reallocation shocks, persistence and nominal rigidities. Economics Letters 141, 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.02.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furlanetto, F. and Robstad, Ø. (2019). Immigration and the macroeconomy: Some new empirical evidence. Review of Economic Dynamics 34, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2019.02.006.Google Scholar
Gehrke, B. and Hochmuth, B. (2021). Counteracting unemployment in crises: Non-linear effects of short-time work policy. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 123(1), 144–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehrke, B., Lechthaler, W., and Merkl, C. (2019). The German labor market during the Great Recession: Shocks and institutions. Economic Modelling 78, 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.09.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartung, B., Jung, P., and Kuhn, M. (2018). What hides behind the German labor market miracle? Unemployment insurance reforms and labor market dynamics. CEPR Discussion Paper DP13328, Centre for Economic Policy Research. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3290520.Google Scholar
Hochmuth, B., Kohlbrecher, B., Merkl, C., and Gartner, H. (2021). Hartz IV and the decline of German unemployment: A macroeconomic evaluation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 127, 104114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2021.104114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochmuth, B., Moyen, S., and Stähler, N. (2019). Labor market reforms, precautionary savings, and global imbalances. Discussion Paper 13/2019, Deutsche Bundesbank. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3391552.Google Scholar
Inoue, A. and Kilian, L. (2020). The role of the prior in estimating VAR models with sign restrictions. Working Paper 2030, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. https://doi.org/10.24149/wp2030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinger, S. and Rothe, T. (2012). The impact of labour market reforms and economic performance on the matching of the short-term and the long-term unemployed. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 59(1), 90–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.2011.00570.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, M. U. and Uhlig, H. (2012). Transitions in the German labor market: Structure and crisis. Journal of Monetary Economics 59(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2011.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, T. and Scheffel, M. (2013). Macroeconomic evaluation of labor market reform in Germany. IMF Economic Review 61(4), 664–701. https://doi.org/10.1057/imfer.2013.19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Launov, A. and Wälde, K. (2013). Estimating incentive and welfare effects of nonstationary unemployment benefits. International Economic Review 54(4), 1159–1198. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Launov, A. and Wälde, K. (2016). The employment effect of reforming a public employment agency. European Economic Review 84, 140–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.08.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2021a). Employee compensation by activity (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/7af78603-en.Google Scholar
OECD (2021b). Value added by activity (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/a8b2bd2b-en.Google Scholar
OECD (2021c). Working age population (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/d339918b-en.Google Scholar
OECD (2021d). Population (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/d434f82b-en.Google Scholar
Rubio-Ramírez, J. F., Waggoner, D. F., and Zha, T. (2010). Structural vector autoregressions: Theory of identification and algorithms for inference. The Review of Economic Studies 77(2), 665–696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00578.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiman, S. (2021). Labor supply shocks and the Beveridge Curve—Empirical evidence from EU enlargement. Review of Economic Dynamics 40, 108–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2020.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar