Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-w9n4q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-18T21:01:35.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stability justice: Petitioners versus non-petitioners in China’s criminal adjudication – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2025

Yuqing Feng  and
Yu Zeng
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Keywords

corrigendum
Type
Corrigendum
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 59 , Special Issue 2: Special Issue on New Perspectives on Empirical Methods and Critical Race Theory , June 2025 , pp. 462
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Law and Society Association.

The authors apologise for omitting the following citation from page 559, immediately following the “Li et al., 2012” reference: [Zeng and Feng, 2021] (Feng and Zeng Reference Feng and Zeng2022. ‘Politicized Adjudication Vis-à-vis Petitioners in Chinese Criminal Justice.’ Journal of Contemporary China 31:740-755).

References

Feng, Yuqing and Zeng, Yu. 2022. “Stability Justice: Petitioners versus Non-Petitioners in China’s Criminal Adjudication.” Law & Society Review 56 (4): . doi:10.1111/lasr.12633CrossRefGoogle Scholar