Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T13:35:26.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legal Insurance, Litigant Decisions, and the Rising Caseloads of Courts: A West German Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Erhard Blankenburg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

German prepaid legal insurance is growing both in terms of number of households insured and in terms of extending coverage to new legal areas. Fears for a litigation explosion, however, can be shown to be unfounded—just as are hopes that legal insurance would remove social inequalities of access to law. The use of legal insurance turns out to be much more limited than could have been expected. Major effects on financing lawsuits occurred only in defense against traffic fines and regulating traffic accidents. Litigation behavior as measured by indicators of litigiousness (such as risking a lawsuit with poor chance for success, resisting settlement, filing an appeal) does not seem to be affected by removing cost considerations. It appears that social costs determine inclination to litigate to a greater degree than do financial costs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , 1982 , pp. 601 - 624
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 The Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

*

This article is a summary of a study jointly done by Jann Fielder and myself at the Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin. The full report was published as DIE RECHTSSCHUTZVERSICHERUNGEN UND DER STEIGENDE GESCHAFTSANFALL DER GERICHTE (1981). I would like to thank David Trubek, who encouraged me to write this article and who commented on an earlier version, and Richard Miller and Robert Sikorski, who helped to bring it into decent English.

References

ADAMS, Michael (1981) Okonomische Analyse des Zivilprozesses. Konigstein: Athenaum.Google Scholar
BACHRACH, Peter and Morton S., BARATZ (1970) Power and Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
BENDER, Rolf and Rolf, SCHUMACHER (1980) Erfolgsbarrieren vor Gericht. Tubingen: J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald (1976) The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
BLANKENBURG, Erhard, SCHÖNHOLZ, Siegfried, and Ralf, ROGOWSKI (1979) Zur Soziologie der Arbeitsgerichtsbarkeit. Neuwied and Darmstadt: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
BLANKENBURG, Erhard (1980) “Mobilisierung von Recht,” 1 Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 33.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1974) “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Review 95.Google Scholar
GESSNER, Volkmar (1976) Recht und Konflikt. Tubingen: J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar
GILLES, Peter (ed.) (1977) Humane Justiz. Kronberg: Athenaum.Google Scholar
KININGER, Ewald (1978) Rechtsschutzversicherung Aas Mittel Tzur Uberwindung Prozessualer Ungleichheit. Vienna: Grenz Verlag.Google Scholar
LAYARD, Richard and Alan, WALTERS (1978) Microeconomic Theory. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
MILLER, Richard and Austin, SARAT (1981) “Grievances, Claims, and Disputes: Assessing the Adversary Culture,” 15 Law & Society Review 525.Google Scholar
PFEIFFER, Gerhard (1980) “Recht als Kuappes Gut,” Richterzeitung, Juli, 1980.Google Scholar
PFENNIGSTORF, Werner and Kimball, Spencer L. (eds.) (1977) Legal Service Plans. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
RUE SCHEME YER, Dietrich (1973) Lawyers and Their Society: A Comparative Study of the Legal Profession in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SARAT, Austin (1976) “Alternatives in Dispute Processing: Litigation in Small Claims Court,” 10 Law & Society Review 339.Google Scholar
STEINBACH, E. Gesellschaft fur Mathematik und Datenverarbeitung. Unpublished ms. Birlinghoven bei Bonn.Google Scholar
STOLZ, Preble (1968) “Insurance for Legal Services: A Preliminary Study of Feasibility,” 35 University of Chicago Law Review 417.Google Scholar