Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-9rk55 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-23T01:17:46.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hazards, Risks, and Enterprise: Approaches to Science, Law, and Social Policy

Review products

Wildavsky Aaron. Searching for Safety. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books 1988. xii + 253 pp. Notes, index.
Douglas Mary. Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1985. 115 pp. Bibliography.
Clarke Lee. Acceptable Risk? Making Decisions in a Toxic Environment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1989. xiii + 229 pp. References, list of interviews, index.

Show more reviewed productsShow more reviewed products

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

James F. Short
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Essays
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , 1990 , pp. 179 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

I am grateful to colleagues Bill Catton, Lisa McIntyre, and Gene Rosa, and to Editor Joe Sanders for their careful and critical reading of earlier drafts, which I hope have been improved as a result of their suggestions.

References

BARBER, Bernard (1983) The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
BELLO, Mark (1989) “Deteriorating Environment Highlight of Conference,” 39 (No. 6) National Research Council News Report 2.Google Scholar
BERKOWITZ, Ari (1989) “Letter,” 246 Science 874.Google Scholar
BUTTEL, Frederick H. (1987) “New Directions in Environmental Sociology,” 13 Annual Review of Sociology 465.Google Scholar
CARSON, W. G. (1989) “Toward a Political Economy of Disaster: review of Bhopal: Anatomy of a Crisis, by Paul Shrivastava,” 12 (No. 3) At the Centre: Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety 13.Google Scholar
CATTON, William R. Jr. (1989) “Choosing Which Danger to Risk,” 27 Society 6 (November/December).Google Scholar
CATTON, William R. Jr. (1980) Overshoot: The Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Change. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
CLARKE, Lee (1989) “Capitalism Is Richer, Democracy Is Safer,” 27 Society 6 (November/December).Google Scholar
CLARKE, Lee (1988) Acceptable Risk? Making Decisions in a Toxic Environment. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
COHEN, Michael, James G., MARCH, and Johan P., OLSEN (1972) “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice,” 17 Administrative Science Quarterly 1.Google Scholar
COOPER, Dan. M. (1989) “Letter,” 246 Science 873.Google Scholar
DIETZ, Thomas M., Paul C., STERN, and Robert W., RYCROFT (1989) “Definitions of Conflict and the Legitimation of Resources: The Case of Environmental Risk,” 4 Sociological Forum 47.Google Scholar
DIETZ, Thomas M., and Robert W., RYCROFT (1987) The Risk Professionals. new York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
DIETZ, Thomas M., R. Scott, FREY, and Eugene A., ROSA (forthcoming) “Risk, Technology, and Society,” in Dunlap, Riley E. and Michelson, William (eds.), Handbook of Environmental Sociology. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
DOUGLAS, Mary (1986) How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
DOUGLAS, Mary, and Wildavsky, Aaron. (1982) Risk and Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
ERIKSON, Kai (1976) Everything in Its Path: Destruction of Community in the Buffalo Creek Flood. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
ERIKSON, Kai (forthcoming) “A New Species of Trouble,” in Couch, Stephen R. and Kroll-Smith, J. Stephen (eds.), Communities At Risk: Collective Responses to Technological Hazards. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
FELSTINER, William L. F., Richard L., ABEL, and Austin, SARAT (1980–81) “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming …,” 15 Law & Society Review 631.Google Scholar
FELSTINER, W. L. F., and Peter, SIEGELMAN (1989) “Neoclassical Difficulties: Tort Deterrence for Latent Injuries,” 11 Law & Policy 309.Google Scholar
FOX, Michael W. (1989) “Biotechnology: Society's Role,” 245 Science 690.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. (1985) A History of American Law, 2d Ed. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
GOLDBLATT, Ann D. (1989) “Warning Symptoms” University of Chicago Magazine 14 (Fall).Google Scholar
GOULD, Leroy C., Gardner, Gerald T., Donald R., DELUCA, Adrian R., TIEMANN, Leonard W., DOOB, and Jan A. J., STOLWIJK (1988) Perceptions of Technological Risks and Benefits. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
HAWKINS, Keith (1989) “TATCATS' and Prosecution in a Regulatory Agency: A Footnote on the Social Construction of Risk,” 11 Law & Policy 370.Google Scholar
HURST, James Willard (1980-81) “The Functions of Courts in the United States, 1950–1980,” 15 Law & Society Review 401.Google Scholar
JASANOFF, Sheila (1989) “Norms for Evaluating Regulatory Science,” 9 Risk Analysis 271.Google Scholar
KASPERSON, Roger E., Ortwin, RENN, Paul, SLOVIC, Halina S., BROWN, Jacque, EMEL, Robert, GOBLE, Jeanne X., KASPERSON, and Samuel, RATICK (1988) “The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework,” 8 Risk Analysis 177.Google Scholar
KOSHLAND, Daniel E. Jr. (1989) “Sequences and Consequences of the Human Genome,” 246 Science 189.Google Scholar
KNIGHT, Frank H. (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
LEIFER, Eric M., and Harrison C., WHITE (1986) “Wheeling and Annealing: Federal and Multidivisional Control,” in Short, James F. (ed.), The Social Fabric: Dimensions and Issues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
LEVINE, Adeline G. (1982) Love Canal: Science, Politics, and People. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, Lexington Books.Google Scholar
LEWIS, J. David, and Andrew, WEIGERT (1985) “Trust as a Social Reality,” 63 Social Forces 967.Google Scholar
LURIA, S.E. (1989) “Letter,” 246 Science 873.Google Scholar
MACHLIS, Gary E., and Eugene A., ROSA (forthcoming) “Desired Risk: Broadening the Social Amplification of Risk Framework,” Risk Analysis.Google Scholar
MANNING, Peter (1989) “Managing Risk: Managing Uncertainty in the British Nuclear Inspectorate,” 77 Law & Policy 350.Google Scholar
MILLER, Richard E., and Austin, SARAT (1980–81) “Grievances, Claims, and Disputes: Assessing the Adversary Culture,” 15 Law & Society Review 525.Google Scholar
NADER, Laura (1988) “A Litigious People? Review of Carol J. Greenhouse, Praying for Justice: Faith, Order, and Community in an American Town,” 22 Law & Society Review 1017.Google Scholar
NELKIN, Dorothy, and Michael S., BROWN (1984) Workers at Risk. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
OGBURN, William F. (1951) “Population, Private Ownership, Technology, and the Standard of Living,” 56 American Journal of Sociology 314.Google Scholar
OGBURN, William F., and Francis R., ALLEN (1959) “Technological Development and Per Capita Income,” 65 American Journal of Sociology 127.Google Scholar
O'CONNOR, James (1989) “Towards an Eco-Marxism,” Newsletter of the Section on Environment and Technology, American Sociological Association 2 (Summer).Google Scholar
PERROW, Charles (1984) Normal Accidents. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
RAPPAPORT, Roy A. (1988) “Toward Postmodern Risk Analysis,” 8 Risk Analysis 189.Google Scholar
RAYNER, Steve. (1988) “Muddling Through Metaphors to Maturity: A Commentary on Kasperson et al., The Social Amplification of Risk.” 8 Risk Analysis 201.Google Scholar
RAYNER, Steve, and Robin, CANTOR (1987) “How Fair Is Safe Enough? the Cultural Approach to Societal Technology Choice,” 7 Risk Analysis 3.Google Scholar
REISS, Albert J. (1989) “The Institutionalization of Risk,” 11 Law & Policy 392.Google Scholar
RIP, Arie (1988) “Should Social Amplification of Risk Be Counteracted?” 8 Risk Analysis 193.Google Scholar
RIFKIN, Jeremy (1985) Declaration of a Heretic. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
SHAPIRO, Susan (1989) “Libel Lawyers as Risk Counselors: Pre-Publication and Pre-broadcast Review and the Social Construction of News,” 11 Law & Policy 281.Google Scholar
SHODELL, Michael (1985) “Risky Business,” Science 85 43 (October).Google Scholar
SHORT, James F. (forthcoming) “On Defining, Describing, and Explaining Elephants (and Reactions to Them): Hazards, Disasters, and Risk Analysis,” Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters.Google Scholar
SHORT, James F.-(1984) “The Social Fabric at Risk: Toward the Social Transformation of Risk Analysis,” 49 American Sociological Review 711.Google Scholar
SILBEY, Susan S. (1980–81) “Case Processing: Consumer Protection in an Attorney General's Office,” 15 Law & Society Review 849.Google Scholar
SVENSON, Ola (1988) “Mental Models of Risk, Communication, and Action: Reflections on Social Amplification of Risk,” 8 Risk Analysis 199.Google Scholar
STANLEY, Manfred (1978) The Technological Conscience: Survival and Dignity in an Age of Expertise. New York: Free Press, 1978.Google Scholar
STINCHCOMBE, Arthur L., and Carol A., HEIMER (1985) Organization Theory and Project Management: Administering Uncertainty in Norwegian Offshore Oil. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
VAUGHAN, Diane (1989) “Regulating Risk: Implications of the Challenger Accident,” 11 Law & Policy 350.Google Scholar
WALSH, Edward J. (1981) “Resource Mobilization and Citizen Protest in Communities Around Three Mile Island,” 29 Social Problems 1.Google Scholar
WILDAVSKY, Aaron (1989) “The Secret of Safety Lies in Danger,” 27 Society 4 (November/December).Google Scholar
WILDAVSKY, Aaron-(1988) “Goldilocks Is Wrong: In Regulation of Biotechnology Only the Extremes Can Be Correct,” Survey Research Center, Working Paper #156, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
WINNER, Langdon (1986) The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar