Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-c8zdz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T19:50:42.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stretching the Adjudicative Paradigm: Another Look at Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State

Review products

Feeley Malcolm and Rubin Edward. 1998. Judicial Policy Making and the Modem State: How the Courts Reformed America's Prisons. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 490. $69.95.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Daniel A. Farber
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , Summer 1999 , pp. 751 - 770
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1999 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Chayes, Abram. 1976. The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation. Harvard Law Review 89:1281–1316.Google Scholar
Coffin, Frank. 1979. The Frontier of Remedies: A Call for Exploration. California Law Review 67:983–99.Google Scholar
Decker, Deborah. 1997. Consent Decrees and the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Wisconsin Law Review 1997:1275–1321.Google Scholar
Diver, Colin. 1979. The Judge as Political Powerbroker: Superintending Structural Change in Public Institutions. Virginia Law Review 65:43–106.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodore, and Yeazell, Stephen. 1980. The Ordinary and the Extraordinary in Institutional Litigation. Harvard Law Review 93:465–517.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William. 1989. Metaprocedure. Yale Law Journal 98:945–74.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen. 1978. The Civil Rights Injunction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
1979. The Supreme Court, 1978 Term–Foreword: The Forms of Justice. Harvard Law Review 93:1–58.Google Scholar
Fletcher, William. 1982. The Discretionary Constitution: Institutional Remedies and Judicial Legitimacy. Yale Law Journal 91:635–97.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon. 1978. The Forms and Limits of Adjudication. Harvard Law Review 92:353–409.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1997. A Critique of Adjudication (fin de siècle). Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael. 1996. Rethinking the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Revolutions. Virginia Law Review 82:1–67.Google Scholar
Liebman, James. 1990. Desegregating Politics: “All-Out” School Desegregation Ex- plained. Columbia Law Review 90:1463–1665.Google Scholar
Nagel, Robert. 1984. Controlling the Structural Injunction. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 7:395–411.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sturm, Susan. 1990. Resolving the Remedial Dilemma: Strategies of judicial Intervention in Prisons. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 138:805–912.Google Scholar
1993. The Legitimacy and Future of Corrections Litigation. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142:639–738.Google Scholar
Yoo, John. 1996. Who Measures the Chancellor's Foot? The Inherent Remedial Au-thority of the Federal Courts. California Law Review 84:1121–77.Google Scholar