Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-pffzl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-11T20:15:36.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Remembering Internet Openness: From the Information Age to the Disinformation Era

Review products

Lawrence Lessig. Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace, Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books, 2006.

Christopher M. Kelty, Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2025

Jeffrey Omari*
Affiliation:
Seattle University School of Law, USA

Abstract

Since the Internet’s mainstream inception in the mid-1990s, the global telecommunications network has transformed from one that offered egalitarian promise to a network that often compromises democratic norms. And, as its conceptual linchpin, Internet “openness” provided the potential for technological innovation that could revolutionize both communication and commerce. The regulatory schemes introduced in the early Internet era thus sought to advance openness and innovation in the fledging online world. But, while the times and technologies have since changed, the regulatory frameworks have largely remained the same. Accordingly, this review essay examines the Internet’s regulatory and cultural history to explore how the open values of the information age gave way to our current era of online disinformation. To do so, I reflect upon two early studies of the digital realm that have advanced discourse and scholarship on Internet openness: Lawrence Lessig’s Code: and Other Laws of Cyberspace, Version 2.0, and Christopher Kelty’s Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Informed by these works, along with related digital scholarship, this essay argues that remembering the history of Internet openness reveals how the free access ideals of the Internet’s foundational age have been transformed by the renewed proprietary conventions of our current disinformation era.

Information

Type
Review Essays
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Bar Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ard, B. J. 2016. “Beyond Net Neutrality: How Zero Rating Can (Sometimes) Advance User Choice, Innovation, and Democratic Participation.” Maryland Law Review 75 (2016): 9841028.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack. 2018. “Free Speech Is a Triangle.” Columbia Law Review 118: 2011–56.Google Scholar
Barlow, John Perry. 1996. “A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace.” Electronic Frontier Foundation, February 8. https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence.Google Scholar
Benkler, Yochai, Faris, Robert, and Roberts, Hal. 2018. Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilstad, Blake T. 1997. “Obscenity and Indecency in a Digital Age: The Legal and Political Implications of Cybersmut, Virtual Pornography, and the Communication Decency Act of 1996.” Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal 13: 321–84.Google Scholar
Boyd, Danah M., and Ellison, Nicole B.. 2008. “Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13: 210–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, James. 2008. The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cesarino, Letícia. 2019. “On Digital Populism in Brazil.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, April 15. https://polarjournal.org/2019/04/15/on-jair-bolsonaros-digital-populism/.Google Scholar
Cesarino, Letícia. 2022. O Mundo do Avesso: Verdade e Política na era Digital. São Paulo: Ubu Editora.Google Scholar
Chan, Anita. 2014. Networking Peripheries: Technological Futures and the Myth of Digital Universalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9360.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayka, Kyle. 2025. “How the Internet Left 4Chan Behind.” The New Yorker, April 30. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/infinite-scroll/how-the-internet-left-4chan-behind.Google Scholar
Chon, Margaret. 2024. “Relational Innovation and the Public Benefits of Copying.” Berkeley Technology Law Journal 39: 1169–98.Google Scholar
Coleman, Gabriella. 2009. “Code Is Speech: Legal Tinkering, Expertise, and Protest among Free and Open-Source Software Developers.” Cultural Anthropology 24, no. 3: 420–54.10.1111/j.1548-1360.2009.01036.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Gabriella. 2013. Coding Freedom: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400845293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Sa e Silva, Fabio. 2022. “Relational Legal Consciousness and Anticorruption: Lavo Jato, Social Media Interactions, and the Coproduction of Law’s Detraction in Brazil (2017–2019).” Law & Society Review 56, no. 3: 344–68.10.1111/lasr.12620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeNardis, Laura. 2009. Protocol Politics: The Globalization of Internet Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262042574.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dibbell, Julian. 2004. “We Pledge Allegiance to the Penguin, and the Intellectual Property Regime for which He Stands, One Nation, Under Lunix, with Free Music and Open Source Software for All. Welcome to Brazil!Wired, November 12. https://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.11/linux.html.Google Scholar
Eichensehr, Kristen. 2019. “Digital Switzerlands.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 167: 665732.Google Scholar
Goldman, Eric. 2020. “An Overview of the United States’ Section 230 Internet Immunity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Online Intermediary Liability, edited by Frosio, Giancarlo, 154–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hasen, Richard L. 2022. Cheap Speech: How Disinformation Poisons Our Politics: And How to Cure It. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Rebecca J. 2021. “Governing the Global Public Square.” Harvard International Law Review 62: 117–74.Google Scholar
Kang, Jerry. 2000. “Cyber-Race.” Harvard Law Review 113: 11301208.10.2307/1342340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, David. 2019. Speech Police: The Global Struggle to Govern the Internet. New York: Columbia Global Reports.10.2307/j.ctv1fx4h8vCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Thomas M. 2023. “Erosion, Backsliding, or Abuse: Three Metaphors for Democratic Erosion.” Law & Social Inquiry 48, no. 1: 314–39.10.1017/lsi.2022.43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelty, Christopher. 2005. “Geeks, Social Imaginaries, and Recursive Publics.” Cultural Anthropology 20, no. 3: 185214.10.1525/can.2005.20.2.185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelty, Christopher. 2008. Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Klonick, Kate. 2018. “The New Governors: The People, Rules, and Processes Governing Online Speech.” Harvard Law Review 131: 15981670.Google Scholar
Koopman, Colin. 2019. How We Became Our Data. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226626611.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence. 1999. Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence. 2004. Free Culture: The Nature and Future of Creativity. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence. 2006. Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace, Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Metz, Cade, and Isaac, Mike. 2025. “Meta Engineers Seek Vindication in DeepSeek’s Apparent Breakthrough.” New York Times, January 29. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/29/technology/meta-deepseek-ai-open-source.html.Google Scholar
McQuade, Barbara. 2024. Attack from Within: How Disinformation Is Sabotaging America. New York: Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
Mizukami, Pedro, and Lemos, Ronaldo. 2008. “From Free Software to Free Culture: The Emergence of Open Business.” In Access to Knowledge in Brazil: New Research on Intellectual Property and Development, edited by Shaver, Lea, 2563. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Mollman, Steve. 2023. “OpenAI is Getting Trolled for Its Name after Refusing to Be Open About Its AI.” Fortune. March 17. https://fortune.com/2023/03/17/sam-altman-rivals-rip-openai-name-not-open-artificial-intelligence-gpt-4/.Google Scholar
Morozov, Evgeny. 2011. The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Munn, Luke. 2019. “Alt-Right Pipeline: Individual Journeys to Extremism Online.” First Monday 24, no. 6: n.p. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i6.10108.Google Scholar
Nemer, David. 2019. “WhatsApp Is Radicalizing the Right in Bolsonaro’s Brazil.” Huffington Post, August 16. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/brazil-jair-bolsonaro-WhatsApp_n_5d542b0de4b05fa9df088ccc.Google Scholar
Nemer, David. 2022. Technology of the Oppressed: Inequity and the Digital Mundane in the Favelas of Brazil. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/14122.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemer, David, and Marks, William. 2025. “The Human Infrastructure of Misinformation: A Case Study of Brazil’s Heteromated Labor.” Cambridge University Press, March 13. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009255165.007.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Sen. 2023. “What is Doxxing and What Can You Do if You are Doxxed?CNN, February 7. https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/07/world/what-is-doxxing-explainer-as-equals-intl-cmd/index.html.Google Scholar
Noble, Safiya Umoja. 2018. Algorithm of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.10.18574/nyu/9781479833641.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omari, Jeffrey. 2018. “Digital Access amongst the Marginalized: Democracy and Internet Governance in Rio de Janeiro.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 41, no. 2: 277–89.10.1111/plar.12264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omari, Jeffrey. 2020. “Is Facebook the Internet? Ethnographic Perspectives on Open Internet Governance in Brazil.” Law & Social Inquiry 45, no. 4: 1093–12.10.1017/lsi.2020.5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omari, Jeffrey. 2022. “Chronicles of Internet Openness: The Brazilian Case Study.” Colorado Tech Law Journal 20: 95134.Google Scholar
Omari, Jeffrey. 2025. “Political Disinformation in the Anthropocene.” Washington & Lee Law Review 81: 2027–93.Google Scholar
Omari, Jeffrey, Saiz, Pablo Rueda, and Ashby Wilson, Richard. 2024. “New Legal Realism at 20: Rethinking Law in an Era of Populism and Social Movements.” Connecticut Law Review 57: 181230.Google Scholar
Philip, Kavita. 2005. “What Is a Technological Author: The Pirate Function and Intellectual Property.” Postcolonial Studies 8, no. 2: 199218.10.1080/13688790500153596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Whitney. 2019. “It Wasn’t Just the Trolls: Early Internet Culture, “Fun,” and the Fires of Exclusionary Laughter.” Social Media + Society 5, no. 3: 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119849493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Pamela. 2006. “Enriching Discourse on Public Domains.” Duke Law Journal 55: 783834.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Pamela. 2016. “Freedom to Tinker.” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 17, no. 1: 563600.10.1515/til-2016-0021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahbaz, Adrian. 2018. “Freedom on the Net 2018: The Rise of Digital Authoritarianism.” Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2018/rise-digital-authoritarianism.Google Scholar
Shaw, Aaron. 2011. “Insurgent Expertise: The Politics of Free/Livre and Open Source Software in Brazil.” Journal of Information Technology and Politics 8: 253–72.10.1080/19331681.2011.592063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitaraman, Ganesh. 2023. “Deplatforming.” Yale Law Journal 133: 499567.Google Scholar
Stallman, Richard. 1985. “The GNU Manifesto.” Dr. Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools. March. https://www.gnu.org/gnu/manifesto.en.html.Google Scholar
Tufekci, Zeynep. 2012. “Beware the Big Data Campaign.” New York Times, November 16. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/17/opinion/beware-the-big-data-campaign.html.Google Scholar
Tufekci, Zeynep. 2014. “Engineering the Public: Big Data: Surveillance and Computational Politics.” First Monday 19, no. 7: n.p. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i7.4901.Google Scholar
Turner, Fred. 2006. From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226817439.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaidhyanathan, Siva. 2004. The Anarchist in the Library: How the Clash Between Freedom and Control Is Hacking the Real World and Crashing the System. New York: Perseus Book Group.Google Scholar
Van Schewick, Barbara. 2015. Network Neutrality and Zero Rating . Federal Communications Commission White Paper. Stanford Law School: Center for Internet and Society.Google Scholar
Volokh, Eugene. 1995. “Cheap Speech and What It Will Do.” Yale Law Journal 104: 1805–50.10.2307/797032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Michael. 2002. “Publics and Counterpublics.” Public Culture 14, no. 1: 4990.10.1215/08992363-14-1-49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Richard Ashby. 2022. “The Anti-Human Rights Machine: Digital Authoritarianism and the Global Assault on Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly. 44: 704–39.10.1353/hrq.2022.0043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Tim. 2003. “Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination.” Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law 2: 141–76.Google Scholar
Zittrain, Jonathan. 2008. The Future of the Internet: And How to Stop It. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Zittrain, Jonathan. 2019. “Three Eras of Digital Governance.” Harvard Law School. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3458435.Google Scholar
Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar