Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-qc88w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-22T12:08:33.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ultimate efficiency of nuclear-pumped gas lasers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Sergei P. Melnikov  and
Anatolii A. Sinyanskii
Sergei P. Melnikov
Affiliation:
All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Experimental Physics, 607200 Arzamas, Nizhni Novgorod Region, Russia
Anatolii A. Sinyanskii
Affiliation:
All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Experimental Physics, 607200 Arzamas, Nizhni Novgorod Region, Russia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We suggest several cascade lasing schemes: (1) cascade of laser transitions between atom (ion) excited levels when the lower laser level of one laser transition is simultaneously the upper laser level of another transition located below; (2) successive lasing, first, on ion transitions, then after ion recombination on atom transitions; (3) while using multicomponent mixtures, successive lasing on atoms (ions) of separate components. These possibilities are discussed in terms of specific lasers, some of which have been studied experimentally.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , December 1993 , pp. 645 - 654
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Akerman, M.A. et al. 1977 Appl. Phys. Lett. 30, 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, W.J. & Hays, G.N. 1989 J. Appl. Phys. 65, 3760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basov, N.G. et al. 1985 Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 12, 228 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Berkeliev, B.M. et al. 1990 Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 17, 1537 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Bunkin, F.V. et al. 1985 Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 12, 245 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Chapovsky, P.L. et al. 1976 Optics Comm. 16, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gudzenko, L.I. & Yakovlenko, S.I. 1978 Plasma Lasers (Atomizdat, Moscow) (in Russian).Google Scholar
Inaba, S. et al. 1982 J. Phys. D 15, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khariton, Y.B. et al. 1984 In Problems of Modern Experimental and Theoretical Physics, Alexandrov, A.P., ed. (Nauka, Leningrad), p. 103 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kolokolov, N.B. 1985 In Plasma Chemistry, Vol. 12, Smirnov, B.M., ed. (Energoatomizdat, Moscow), p. 56 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kopai-Gora, A.P. et al. 1986 Prib. Tekh. Eksp. 5, 171 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Magda, E.P. et al. 1991 In Proceedings of the International Conference LASERS '90, San Diego, CA, Harris, D.G. and Herbelin, J., eds. (STS Press, McLean, VA), p. 827.Google Scholar
Melnikov, S.P. & Sinyanskii, A.A. 1991a Sov. Tech. Phys. Lett. 17, 78 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Melnikov, S.P. & Sinyanskii, A.A. 1991b Sov. J. Opt. Spectrosc. 71, 545 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Melnikov, S.P. & Sinyanskii, A.A. 1991c Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 18, 1444 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Miley, G.H. et al. 1989 In Proceedings of the ANS/NBS Conference: Fifty Years With Nuclear Fission, Gaithersburg, MD, pp. 333–342.Google Scholar
Mis'kevich, A.I. et al. 1980 Sov. Tech. Phys. Lett. 6, 818.Google Scholar
Mis'kevich, A.I. et al. 1990 Sov. Tech. Phys. Lett. 16, 62 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Rees, D.B. et al. 1969 J. Appl. Phys. 40, 1884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sazhina, N.N. et al. 1991 Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 18, 1047 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Schneider, R.T. & Hohl, F. 1984 In Advances in Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol. 16, Lewins, J. and Becker, M., eds. (Plenum Press, New York), p. 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenhuijsen, L.W.G. et al. 1979 J. Phys. 40, C8.Google Scholar
Voinov, A.M. et al. 1979a Sov. Tech. Phys. Lett. 5, 422 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Voinov, A.M. et al. 1979b Sov. Phys. Dokl. 245, 80 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Voinov, A.M. et al. 1981 Sov. Tech. Phys. Lett. 7, 1016 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Voinov, A.M. et al. 1982 Sov. J. Tech. Phys. 52, 1346 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Voinov, A.M. et al. 1989 Sov. Tech. Phys. Lett. 15, 56 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Voinov, A.M. et al. 1990a In Proceedings of the International Quantum Electronics Conference, Postdeadline Papers, CA, p. 348.Google Scholar
Voinov, A.M. et al. 1990b Tech. Phys. Lett. 16, 86 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Voinov, A.M. et al. 1990c Sov. Phys. Dokl. 312, 864 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Voinov, A.M. et al. 1990d Sov. J. Tech. Phys. 60, 100 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Voinov, A.M. et al. 1990e Sov. Tech. Phys. Lett. 16, 34 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Voinov, A.M. et al. 1991a Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 18, 177 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Voinov, A.M. et al. 1991b Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 18, 1297 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Voinov, A.M. et al. 1991c In Proceedings of the International Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, Baltimore, MD, p. 250.Google Scholar