Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-qc88w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-19T14:01:57.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent progress and perspectives of laser–plasma accelerators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2009

Atsushi Ogata  and
Kazuhisa Nakajima
Atsushi Ogata
Affiliation:
High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305, Japan
Kazuhisa Nakajima
Affiliation:
High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent progress in laser-plasma accelerators has matured a concept of particle acceleration as a possible next-generation particle accelerator promising ultrahigh accelerating gradients in a compact size. Four major concepts of laser-plasma accelerators—the plasma beat wave accelerator, the laser wakefield accelerator, the self-modulated laser wakefield accelerator, and the plasma wakefield accelerator—are reviewed on accelerator physics issues and experiments demonstrating the basic mechanisms of their concepts. As a perspective to the future practical application, a design of 5-TeV linear colliders based on the laser wakefield accelerator is discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , June 1998 , pp. 381 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Amiranoff, F.et al. 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 5220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreev, N.E.et al. 1992 JETP Lett. 55, 571.Google Scholar
Andreev, N.E.et al. 1994 Physica Scripta 49, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, A.et al. 1995 Opt. Lett. 20, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulanov, S.V.et al. 1992 Phys. Fluids B 4, 1935.Google Scholar
Chen, P.et al. 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, P.et al. 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1986.Google Scholar
Clayton, C.E.et al. 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 37.Google Scholar
Durfee, C.G. III & Milchberg, H.M. 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2409.Google Scholar
Ebrahim, N.A. 1994 J. Appl. Phys. 76, 7645.Google Scholar
Esarey, E.et al. 1993 Phys. Fluids B 6, 2690.Google Scholar
Esarey, E.et al. 1996 IEEE Trans. Plasma Phys. 24, 252.Google Scholar
Gai, W.et al. 1997 Proc. 1996 Linac Confi, Geneva, p. 39.Google Scholar
Joshi, C.et al. 1981 Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1285.Google Scholar
Kando, M.et al. 1997 Proc. AIP Conf. 398, 390.Google Scholar
Katsouleas, T.et al. 1987 Part. Accel. 22, 81.Google Scholar
Katsouleas, T.C. 1996 IEEE Trans. Plasma Phys. 24, 443.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, Y.et al 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krall, J.et al. 1993 Phys. Rev. £48, 2157.Google Scholar
Maine, P.et al. 1988 IEEE J. Quant. Electron. QE-24, 398.Google Scholar
Marques, J.R.et al. 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3566.Google Scholar
Marques, J.R.et al. 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3463.Google Scholar
Militsyn, B.L.et al. 1993 Phys. Fluids B 5, 2714.Google Scholar
Modena, A.et al. 1995 Nature 377, 806.Google Scholar
Moore, C.I.et al. 1997 Proc. AIP Conf. 398, 400.Google Scholar
Nakajima, K. 1990 Part. Accel. 32, 209.Google Scholar
Nakajima, K. 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45, 1149.Google Scholar
Nakajima, K.et al. 1994 Physica Scripta T52, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakajima, K.et al 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4428.Google Scholar
Ogata, A. 1992 AIP Conf. Proc. 279, 420.Google Scholar
Ogata, A.et al. 1996 AIP Conf. Proc. 367, 463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogorelsky, I. 1997 Proc. AIP Conf. 398, 923.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, J.B.et al 1988a Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 98.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, J.B.et al 1988b Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenzweig, J.B.et al 1991 Phys. Rev. A 44, R6189.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, J.B.et al 1997 In Proc. Snowmass ‘96 (to be published).Google Scholar
Ruth, R.et al 1985 Part. Accel 17, 171.Google Scholar
Siders, C.W.et al 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprangle, P.et al 1988 Appl Phys. Lett. 53, 2146.Google Scholar
Sprangle, P.et al 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 4463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajima, T. & Dawson, J.M. 1979 Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 267.Google Scholar
Umstadter, D.et al 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umstadter, D.et al. 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R.et al. 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3125.Google Scholar
Wang, X.J.et al. 1996 Phys. Rev. E 54, R3121.Google Scholar
Xie, M.et al 1997 Proc. AIP Conf. 398, 233.Google Scholar