Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-4ct9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-01-04T11:13:31.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vowel Deletion as Grammatically Controlled Gestural Overlap in Uspanteko

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Ryan Bennett*
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Robert Henderson*
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Meg Harvey*
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
*
Bennett, Stevenson Academic Services, UC Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064-1077 [rbennett@ucsc.edu], [rhenderson@arizona.edu] (Henderson), [mharvey3@arizona.edu] (Harvey)
Bennett, Stevenson Academic Services, UC Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064-1077 [rbennett@ucsc.edu], [rhenderson@arizona.edu] (Henderson), [mharvey3@arizona.edu] (Harvey)
Bennett, Stevenson Academic Services, UC Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064-1077 [rbennett@ucsc.edu], [rhenderson@arizona.edu] (Henderson), [mharvey3@arizona.edu] (Harvey)
Get access

Abstract

Uspanteko is an endangered Mayan language spoken in Guatemala. Unstressed vowels in Uspanteko often delete, though deletion is variable within and across speakers. Deletion appears to be phonological: it is sensitive to foot structure, morphology, and certain phonotactics, and it occurs in slow, careful speech. But deletion also has characteristics more typical of a phonetic process: it is intertwined with a pattern of gradient vowel reduction and is insensitive to most phonotactics. Electroglottography data shows that even ‘deleted’ vowels may contribute voicing to intervals when flanked by voiceless consonants. This suggests that ‘deleted’ vowels are represented in the input to speech production, even when they are acoustically masked by articulatory overlap with adjacent segments. We conclude that vowel deletion is grammatically controlled gestural overlap, consistent with the claim that phonological representations encode information about the relative timing and coordination of articulatory gestures (e.g. Browman & Goldstein 1986, Gafos 2002). At a minimum, language-specific phonetic processes must have access to more fine-grained, abstract grammatical information than is usually assumed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2023 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aissen, Judith, England, Nora; and Maldonado, Roberto Zavala (eds.) 2017. The Mayan languages. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315192345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, David I., Lohse, Keith R., Costa, Thiago Lopes, Videira; and Williams, A. Mark. 2021. Individual differences in motor skill learning: Past, present and future. Human Movement Science 78:102818. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2021.102818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, Stephen R. 1974. The organization of phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1975. On the interaction of phonological rules of various types. Journal of Linguistics 11. 3962. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4175278.10.1017/S0022226700004266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia. 2012. The usefulness of metrics in the quantification of speech rhythm. Journal of Phonetics 40. 351–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2012.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aylett, Matthew, and Turk, Alice. 2004. The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 47. 3156. DOI: 10.1177/00238309040470010201.10.1177/00238309040470010201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baird, Brandon. 2011. Phonetic and phonological realizations of ‘broken glottal’ vowels in K'ichee'. In Shklovsky et al., 3950.Google Scholar
Baird, Brandon, and Pascual, Adán Francisco. 2011. Realizaciones foneticas de /Vʔ/ en Q'anjob'al (Maya). Proceedings of the Conference on Indigenous Languages of Latin America (CILLA) V. Online: https://www.ailla.utexas.org/sites/default/files/documents/Baird_Pascual_CILLA_V.pdf.Google Scholar
Baković, Eric. 2005. Antigemination, assimilation and the determination of identity. Phonology 22. 279315. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675705000631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baković, Eric. 2007. A revised typology of opaque generalisations. Phonology 24. 217–59. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675707001194.10.1017/S0952675707001194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baković, Eric. 2011. Opacity and ordering. In Goldsmith et al, 4067. DOI: 10.1002/9781444343069.ch2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baranowski, Maciej, and Turton, Danielle. 2020. td-deletion in British English: New evidence for the long-lost morphological effect. Language Variation and Change 32. 123. DOI: 10.1017/S0954394520000034.10.1017/S0954394520000034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan, and Kavitskaya, Darya. 2002. Phonetic analogy and schwa deletion in French. Berkeley Linguistics Society 28. 3950. DOI: 10.3765/bls.v28i1.3817.Google Scholar
Barrett, Rusty. 1999. A grammar of Sipakapense Maya. Austin: University of Texas at Austin dissertation.Google Scholar
Barrett, Rusty. 2011. Morphological conditioning in Sipakapense phonology. In Shklovsky et al., 5163.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. 1996. When is a syllable not a syllable? Phonological structure and language processing: Cross-linguistic studies, ed. by Otake, Takashi and Cutler, Anne, 95124. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110815825.95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary E., and Shoji, Atsuko. 1984. Spectral and perceptual evidence for CV coarticulation in devoiced /si/ and /syu/ in Japanese. Phonetica 41. 6171. DOI: 10.1159/000261712.10.1159/000261712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Alan, Brenier, Jason M., Gregory, Michelle, Girand, Cynthia; and Jurafsky, Dan. 2009. Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language 60. 92111. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.003.10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Melanie J., Hedia, Sonia Ben; and Plag, Ingo. 2021. How morphological structure affects phonetic realisation in English compound nouns. Morphology 31. 87120. DOI: 10.1007/s11525-020-09346-6.10.1007/s11525-020-09346-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellik, Jennifer. 2018. Vowel intrusion in Turkish onset clusters. Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz dissertation. Online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1xn6m49b.Google Scholar
Bennett, Ryan. 2016. Mayan phonology. Language and Linguistics Compass 10. 469514. DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12148.10.1111/lnc3.12148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Ryan. 2018. Recursive prosodic words in Kaqchikel (Mayan). Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3(1):67. DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.550.Google Scholar
Bennett, Ryan, Harizanov, Boris; and Henderson, Robert. 2018. Prosodic smothering in Macedonian and Kaqchikel. Linguistic Inquiry 46. 195246. DOI: 10.1162/LING_a_00272.10.1162/LING_a_00272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Ryan, Harvey, Meg, Henderson, Robert; and López, Tomás Alberto Méndez. 2022. The phonetics and phonology of Uspanteko (Mayan). Language and Linguistics Compass 16:e12467. DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12467.10.1111/lnc3.12467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Ryan, and Henderson, Robert. 2013. Accent in Uspanteko. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31. 589645. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-013-9196-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Ryan, Henderson, Robert; and Harvey, Megan. 2022. Tonal variability and marginal contrast: Lexical pitch accent in Uspanteko. Prosody and prosodic interfaces, ed. by Kubozono, Haruo, Ito, Junko, and Mester, Armin, 187226. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198869740.003.0007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Ryan, , Máire, Chiosáin, , Padgett, Jaye; and McGuire, Grant. 2018. An ultrasound study of Connemara Irish palatalization and velarization. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 48. 261304. DOI: 10.1017/S0025100317000494.10.1017/S0025100317000494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beňuš, Štefan, and Gafos, Adamantios I.. 2007. Articulatory characteristics of Hungarian ‘transparent’ vowels. Journal of Phonetics 35. 271300. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2006.11.002.10.1016/j.wocn.2006.11.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2015. Amphichronic explanation and the life cycle of phonological processes. The Oxford handbook of historical phonology, ed. by Honeybone, Patrick and Salmons, Joseph, 374–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199232819.013.014.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette, and Garrett, Andrew. 1998. The origins of consonant-vowel metathesis. Language 74. 508–56. DOI: 10.2307/417792.10.1353/lan.1998.0012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette, and Garrett, Andrew. 2004. The evolution of metathesis. Phonetically based phonology, ed. by Hayes, Bruce, Kirchner, Robert, and Steriade, Donca, 117–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511486401.005.Google Scholar
Blumenfeld, Lev. 2006. Constraints on phonological interactions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University dissertation.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 2011. A programme for bidirectional phonology and phonetics and their acquisition and evolution. Bidirectional optimality theory, ed. by Benz, Anton and Mattausch, Jason, 3372. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.180.02boeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul, and Hayes, Bruce. 2001. Empirical tests of the gradual learning algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32. 4586. DOI: 10.1162/002438901554586.10.1162/002438901554586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul, and Weenink, David. 2020. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 6.1.05. Online: http://www.praat.org/.Google Scholar
Borise, Lena. 2017. Prominence redistribution in the Aŭciuki dialect of Belarusian. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 24: The NYU meeting 2015, 94109. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Borroff, Marianne. 2005. Articulatory phasing of glottal stop. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 24. 7078. Online: http://www.lingref.com/cpp/wccfl/24/abstract1208.html.Google Scholar
Borroff, Marianne. 2007. A landmark underspecification account of the patterning of glottal stop. Stony Brook, NY: Stony Brook University dissertation.Google Scholar
Bradley, Travis G. 2004. Gestural timing and rhotic variation in Spanish codas. Laboratory approaches to Spanish phonology, ed. by Face, Timothy L., 197224. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bradley, Travis G. 2005. Systemic markedness and phonetic detail in phonology. Theoretical and experimental approaches to Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the 34th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), ed. by Gess, Randall and Rubin, Edward J., 4162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Travis G. 2006. Spanish complex onsets and the phonetics–phonology interface. Optimality-theoretic studies in Spanish phonology, ed. by Martínez-Gil, Fernando and Colina, Sonia, 1538. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.99.02braCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Travis G. 2007. Morphological derived-environment effects in gestural coordination: A case study of Norwegian clusters. Lingua 117. 950–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.004.10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, Catherine P., and Goldstein, Louis. 1986. Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology 3. 219–52. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675700000658.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine P., and Goldstein, Louis. 1988. Some notes on syllable structure in articulatory phonology. Phonetica 45. 140–55. DOI: 10.1159/000261823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browman, Catherine P., and Goldstein, Louis. 1989. Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6. 201–51. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675700001019.10.1017/S0952675700001019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, Catherine P., and Goldstein, Louis. 1990. Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. In Kingston & Beckman, 341–76. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511627736.019.10.1017/CBO9780511627736.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, Catherine P., and Goldstein, Louis. 1992a. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica 49. 155–80. DOI: 10.1159/000261913.10.1159/000261913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, Catherine P., and Goldstein, Louis. 1992b. ‘Targetless’ schwa: An articulatory analysis. Papers in laboratory phonology 2: Gesture, segment, prosody, ed. by Docherty, Gerard and Ladd, D. Robert, 2656. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519918.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, Catherine P., and Goldstein, Louis. 2000. Competing constraints on inter-gestural coordination and self-organization of phonological structures. Les Cahiers de l'ICP: Bulletin de la communication parlée 5. 2534.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, Marc, and New, Boris. 2009. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 41. 977–90. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977.10.3758/BRM.41.4.977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bürki, Audrey, Fougeron, Cécile, Gendrot, Cedric; and Frauenfelder, Ulrich H.. 2011. Phonetic reduction versus phonological deletion of French schwa: Some methodological issues. Journal of Phonetics 39. 279–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.07.003.10.1016/j.wocn.2010.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, Martha W., Blumstein, Sheila E.; and Stevens, Kenneth N.. 1992. A phonetic analysis of prenasalized stops in Moru. Journal of Phonetics 20. 127–42. DOI: 10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30243-8.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30243-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, Dani. 1996. A phase window framework for articulatory timing. Phonology 13. 139–69. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675700002086.10.1017/S0952675700002086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, Dani, and Krivokapić, Jelena, 2021. Cracking prosody in articulatory phonology. Annual Review of Linguistics 7. 3153. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030920-050033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, Dani, Krivokapić;, Jelena and Lee, Sungbok. 2006. How far, how long: On the temporal scope of prosodic boundary effects. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120. 1589–99. DOI: 10.1121/1.2217135.10.1121/1.2217135CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrd, Dani, and Riggs, Daylen. 2008. Locality interactions with prominence in determining the scope of phrasal lengthening. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 38. 187202. DOI: 10.1017/S0025100308003460.10.1017/S0025100308003460CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrd, Dani, and Saltzman, Elliot. 2003. The elastic phrase: Modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening. Journal of Phonetics 31. 149–80. DOI: 10.1016/S0095-4470(02)00085-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byun, Tara McAllister, Inkelas, Sharon; and Rose, Yvan. 2016. The A-map model: Articulatory reliability in child-specific phonology. Language 92. 141–78. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2016.0000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byun, Tara McAllister, and Tessier, Anne-Michelle. 2016. Motor influences on grammar in an emergentist model of phonology. Language and Linguistics Compass 10. 431–52. DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12205.10.1111/lnc3.12205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, Gabriela. 2008. Choguita Rarámuri (Tarahumara) phonology and morphology. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation. Online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9jr2f8md.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1977. Quichean linguistic prehistory. (University of California publications in linguistics 81.) Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Can Pixabaj, Telma. 2007. Gramática descriptiva Uspanteka. Antigua, Guatemala: Oxlajuuj Keej Maya' Ajtz'iib' (OKMA).Google Scholar
Can Pixabaj, Telma. 2017. K'iche'. In Aissen et al., 461–99.Google Scholar
Casserly, Elizabeth D. 2012. Gestures in optimality theory and the laryngeal phonology of Faroese. Lingua 122. 4165. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.11.003.10.1016/j.lingua.2011.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chitoran, Ioana, and Cohn, Abigail C.. 2009. Complexity in phonetics and phonology: Gradience, categoriality, and naturalness. In Pellegrino et al., 2146. DOI: 10.1515/9783110223958.19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chitoran, Ioana, Goldstein, Louis; and Byrd, Dani. 2002. Gestural overlap and recoverability: Articulatory evidence from Georgian. In Gussenhoven & Warner, 419–47. DOI: 10.1515/9783110197105.2.419.10.1515/9783110197105.2.419.10.1515/9783110197105.2.419.10.1515/9783110197105.2.419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Taehong. 2001. Effects of morpheme boundaries on intergestural timing: Evidence from Korean. Phonetica 58. 129–62. DOI: 10.1159/000056196.10.1159/000056196CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, Taehong, and Ladefoged, Peter. 1999. Variation and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics 27. 207–29. DOI: 10.1006/jpho.1999.0094.10.1006/jpho.1999.0094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Churchyard, Henry. 1999. Topics in Tiberian Biblical Hebrew metrical phonology and prosodics. Austin: University of Texas at Austin dissertation.Google Scholar
Coetzee, Andries W., and Kawahara, Shigeto. 2013. Frequency biases in phonological variation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31. 4789. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-012-9179-z.10.1007/s11049-012-9179-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coetzee, Andries W., and Pater, Joe. 2011. The place of variation in phonological theory. In Goldsmith et al., 401–34. DOI: 10.1002/9781444343069.ch13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, Abigail C. 1993. Nasalisation in English: Phonology or phonetics. Phonology 10. 4381. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675700001731.10.1017/S0952675700001731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, Abigail C. 1998. The phonetics-phonology interface revisited: Where's phonetics? Texas Linguistic Forum 41. 2540.Google Scholar
Cohn, Abigail C. 2006. Is there gradient phonology? Gradience in grammar: Generative perspectives, ed. by Fanselow, Gisbert, Féry, Caroline, Vogel, Ralf, and Schlesewsky, Matthias, 2544. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.003.0002.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.003.0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, Abigail C. 2007. Phonetics in phonology and phonology in phonetics. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 16. 131.Google Scholar
Coon, Jessica. 2016. Mayan morphosyntax. Language and Linguistics Compass 10. 515–50. DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Côté, Marie-Hélène, and Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart. 2007. The nature of the schwa/zero alternation in French clitics: Experimental and non-experimental evidence. Journal of French Language Studies 17. 159–86. DOI: 10.1017/S0959269507002827.Google Scholar
Crosswhite, Katherine. 2001. Vowel reduction in optimality theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cutler, Anne. 2012. Native listening: Language experience and the recognition of spoken words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9012.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabkowski, Meghan Frances. 2018. Variable vowel reduction in Mexico City Spanish. Columbus: The Ohio State University dissertation. Online: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1531994893143203.Google Scholar
Daland, Robert, Hayes, Bruce, White, James, Garellek, Marc, Davis, Andrea; and Norrmann, Ingrid. 2011. Explaining sonority projection effects. Phonology 28. 197234. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675711000145.10.1017/S0952675711000145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Lisa. 2003. The atoms of phonological representation: Gestures, coordination and perceptual features in consonant cluster phonotactics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University dissertation.Google Scholar
Davidson, Lisa. 2006a. Phonotactics and articulatory coordination interact in phonology: Evidence from nonnative production. Cognitive Science 30. 837–62. DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Lisa. 2006b. Schwa elision in fast speech: Segmental deletion or gestural overlap? Phonetica 63. 79112. DOI: 10.1159/000095304.10.1159/000095304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Lisa. 2016. Variability in the implementation of voicing in American English obstruents. Journal of Phonetics 54. 3550. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.09.003.10.1016/j.wocn.2015.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Lisa. 2018. Phonation and laryngeal specification in American English voiceless obstruents. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 48. 331–56. DOI: 10.1017/S0025100317000330.10.1017/S0025100317000330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Lisa. 2021. Effects of word position and flanking vowel on the implementation of glottal stop: Evidence from Hawaiian. Journal of Phonetics 88:101075. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101075.10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, Kenneth J. 1995. The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97. 491504. DOI: 10.1121/1.412275.10.1121/1.412275CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Lacy, Paul. 2002. The interaction of tone and stress in optimality theory. Phonology 19. 132. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675702004220.10.1017/S0952675702004220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lacy, Paul. 2004. Markedness conflation in optimality theory. Phonology 21. 145–99. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675704000193.10.1017/S0952675704000193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lacy, Paul. 2006. Markedness: Reduction and preservation in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lacy, Paul (ed.) 2007a. The Cambridge handbook of phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511486371.10.1017/CBO9780511486371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lacy, Paul. 2007b. The interaction of tone, sonority, and prosodic structure. In de Lacy 2007a, 281307. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511486371.013.10.1017/CBO9780511486371.013.10.1017/CBO9780511486371.013.10.1017/CBO9780511486371.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delforge, Ann Marie. 2009. The rise and fall of unstressed vowel reduction in the Spanish of Cusco, Peru: A sociophonetic study. Davis: University of California, Davis dissertation.Google Scholar
Delgutte, Bertrand. 1997. Auditory neural processing of speech. The handbook of phonetic sciences, ed. by Hardcastle, William and Laver, John, 507–38. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
DiCanio, Christian T. 2012. Coarticulation between tone and glottal consonants in Itunyoso Trique. Journal of Phonetics 40. 162–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.10.006.10.1016/j.wocn.2011.10.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiCanio, Christian T., and Bennett, Ryan. 2021. Mesoamerica. The Oxford handbook of language prosody, ed. by Gussenhoven, Carlos and Chen, Aoju, 408–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198832232.013.25.Google Scholar
Eischens, Ben. 2022. Tone, phonation, and the phonology-phonetics interface in San Martín Peras Mixtec. Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz dissertation.Google Scholar
Ellis, Lucy, and Hardcastle, William J.. 2002. Categorical and gradient properties of assimilation in alveolar to velar sequences: Evidence from EPG and EMA data. Journal of Phonetics 30. 373–96. DOI: 10.1006/jpho.2001.0162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
England, Nora, and Baird, Brandon. 2017. Phonology and phonetics. In Aissen et al., 175200.Google Scholar
Ernestus, Mirjam. 2011. Gradience and categoricality in phonological theory. In van Oostendorp et al., 2115–36. DOI: 10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0089.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0089.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0089.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemming, Edward. 1995. Auditory representations in phonology. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation. Online: https://linguistics.ucla.edu/general/dissertations/Flemming.1995.pdf.Google Scholar
Flemming, Edward. 2001. Scalar and categorical phenomena in a unified model of phonetics and phonology. Phonology 18. 744. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675701004006.10.1017/S0952675701004006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile, and Steriade, Donca. 1997. Does deletion of French SCHWA lead to neutralization of lexical distinctions? Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech 1997), 943–46. DOI: 10.21437/Eurospeech.1997-332.10.21437/Eurospeech.1997-332.10.21437/Eurospeech.1997-332.10.21437/Eurospeech.1997-332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, Melissa. 2009. The production and perception of pitch and glottalization in Yucatec Maya. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill dissertation. DOI: 10.17615/sd6j-0526.Google Scholar
Gafos, Adamantios I. 1999. The articulatory basis of locality in phonology. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Gafos, Adamantios I. 2002. A grammar of gestural coordination. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20. 269337. DOI: 10.1023/A:1014942312445.10.1023/A:1014942312445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gafos, Adamantios I., and Beňuš, Štefan, 2006. Dynamics of phonological cognition. Cognitive Science 30. 905–43. DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_80.10.1207/s15516709cog0000_80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gafos, Adamantios I., and Goldstein, Louis. 2012. Articulatory representation and organization. The Oxford handbook of laboratory phonology, ed. by Cohn, Abigail, Fougeron, Cécile, and Huffman, Marie, 220–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199575039.013.0010.Google Scholar
Garellek, Marc. 2013. Production and perception of glottal stops. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.Google Scholar
Gick, Bryan, Bliss, Heather, Michelson, Karin; and Radanov, Bosko. 2012. Articulation without acoustics: ‘Soundless’ vowels in Oneida and Blackfoot. Journal of Phonetics 40. 4653. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.09.002.10.1016/j.wocn.2011.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, John, Yu, Alan C. L.; and Riggle, Jason (eds.) 2011. The handbook of phonological theory. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781444343069.10.1002/9781444343069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Louis. 2011. Back to the past tense in English. Representing language: Essays in honor of Judith Aissen, ed. by Bravo, Rodrigo Gutiérrez, Mikkelsen, Line, and Potsdam, Eric, 6988. Santa Cruz, CA: Linguistics Research Center. Online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0vf4s9tk#page-69.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Louis, and Browman, Catherine P.. 1986. Representation of voicing contrasts using articulatory gestures. Journal of Phonetics 14. 339–42. DOI: 10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30662-X.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30662-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Louis, Byrd, Dani; and Saltzman, Elliot. 2006. The role of vocal tract gestural action units in understanding the evolution of phonology. Action to language via the mirror neuron system, ed. by Arbib, Michael A., 215–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511541599.008.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Louis, and Fowler, Carol A.. 2003. Articulatory phonology: A phonology for public language use. Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities, ed. by Schiller, Niels O. and Meyer, Antje S., 159208. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110895094.159.10.1515/9783110895094.159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2006. Syllable weight: Phonetics, phonology, typology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew, Ghushchyan, Edita, McDonnell, Bradley, Rosenblum, Daisy; and Shaw, Patricia A.. 2012. Sonority and central vowels: A cross-linguistic phonetic study. The sonority controversy, ed. by Parker, Steve, 219–56. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9783110261523.219.Google Scholar
Gouskova, Maria. 2003. Deriving economy: Syncope in optimality theory. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst dissertation.Google Scholar
Gouskova, Maria. 2012. Unexceptional segments. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30. 79133. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-011-9142-4.10.1007/s11049-011-9142-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, James. 1972. The phonological history of the Quichean languages. Carbondale, IL: University Museum, Southern Illinois University. Online: https://ailla.utexas.org/islandora/object/ailla%3A128604.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos, and Warner, Natasha (eds.) 2002. Laboratory phonology 7. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110197105.10.1515/9783110197105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Nancy. 2003. Gestures and segments: Vowel intrusion as overlap. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Amherst dissertation.Google Scholar
Hall, Nancy. 2006. Cross-linguistic patterns of vowel intrusion. Phonology 23. 387429. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675706000996.10.1017/S0952675706000996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, Silke. 2003. The phonetics and phonology of retroflexes. Utrecht: Utrecht University dissertation. Online: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/627.Google Scholar
Hamann, Silke. 2011. The phonetics-phonology interface. The Continuum companion to phonology, ed. by Kula, Nancy C., Botma, Bert, and Nasukawa, Kuniya, 202–24. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Hardcastle, William J., and Hewlett, Nigel (eds.) 1999. Coarticulation: Theory, data and techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1986. Assimilation as spreading in Toba Batak. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 467–99. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4178500.Google Scholar
Henderson, Robert, López, Tomás Alberto Méndez, Bennett, Ryan; and Harvey, Meg. 2022. Xoqoneb': Una historia uspanteka de las tierras altas centrales de Guatemala. Tlalocan 27. 125–60. DOI: 10.19130/iifl.tlalocan.27.2.010087X94.10.19130/iifl.tlalocan.27.2.010087X94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbst, Christian T. 2020. Electroglottography—an update. Journal of Voice 34. 503–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.12.014.10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.12.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herszage, Jasmine, Dayan, Eran, Sharon, Haggai; and Censor, Nitzan. 2020. Explaining individual differences in motor behavior by intrinsic functional connectivity and corticospinal excitability. Frontiers in Neuroscience 14:76. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00076.10.3389/fnins.2020.00076CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hockett, Charles. 1955. A manual of phonology. Baltimore: Waverly.Google Scholar
Hout, Katherine. 2020. Conspiratorial exceptionality: A case study of Mushunguli. San Diego: University of California, San Diego dissertation. Online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1fm6d891.Google Scholar
Idsardi, William J. 2000. Clarifying opacity. The Linguistic Review 17. 337–50. DOI: 10.1515/tlir.2000.17.2-4.337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idsardi, William J. 2006. Canadian raising, opacity, and rephonemicization. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 51. 119–26. DOI: 10.1017/S0008413100004011.10.1017/S0008413100004011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iskarous, Khalil, McDonough;, Joyce and Whalen, D. H.. 2012. A gestural account of the velar fricative in Navajo. Laboratory Phonology 3. 195210. DOI: 10.1515/lp-2012-0011.10.1515/lp-2012-0011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jannedy, Stefanie. 1995. Gestural phasing as an explanation for vowel devoicing in Turkish. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 45. 5684. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/1811/81970.Google Scholar
Johnson, Blake, Jobst, Cecilia, Al-Loos, Rita, He, Wei; and Cheyne, Douglas. 2020. Individual differences in motor development during early childhood: An MEG study. Developmental Science 23:e12935. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12935.10.1111/desc.12935CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, Keith. 2012. Acoustic and auditory phonetics. 3rd edn. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. [1st edn, 1997.].Google Scholar
Jun, Jongho. 1996. Place assimilation is not the result of gestural overlap: Evidence from Korean and English. Phonology 13. 377407. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675700002682.10.1017/S0952675700002682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah, Beckman, Mary, Niimi, Seiji; and Tiede, Mark. 1997. Electromyographic evidence for a gestural-overlap analysis of vowel devoicing in Korean. Speech Sciences 1. 153200. Online: https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO199715637233338.page.Google Scholar
Kager, René. 1997. Rhythmic vowel deletion in optimality theory. Derivations and constraints in phonology, ed. by Roca, Iggy, 463–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen. 1985. Connected speech: The interaction of syntax and phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Katsika, Argyro. 2012. Coordination of prosodic gestures at boundaries in Greek. New Haven, CT: Yale University dissertation.Google Scholar
Katsika, Argyro. 2018. The kinematic profile of prominence in Greek. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2018, 764–68. DOI: 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-155.10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-155.10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-155.10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katsika, Argyro, Krivokapić, Jelena, Mooshammer, Christine, Tiede, Mark; and Goldstein, Louis. 2014. The coordination of boundary tones and its interaction with prominence. Journal of Phonetics 44. 6282. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.03.003.10.1016/j.wocn.2014.03.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, Terrence. 1976. Proyecto de alfabetos y ortografías para escribir las lenguas mayances. Antigua, Guatemala: Proyecto Lingüístico Francisco Marroquín.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto. 2001. Similarity among variants: Output-variant correspondence. Tokyo: International Christian University senior thesis. Online: http://roa.rutgers.edu/article/view/507.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto. 2002. Faithfulness among variants. Phonological Studies (Journal of the Phonological Society of Japan) 5. 4754.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto. 2006. A faithfulness ranking projected from a perceptibility scale: The case of [+voice] in Japanese. Language 82. 536–74. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2006.0146.10.1353/lan.2006.0146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto. 2011. Experimental approaches in theoretical phonology. In van Oostendorp et al., 22832303. DOI: 10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0096.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0096.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0096.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto. 2015. A catalogue of phonological opacity in Japanese. Version 1.2. Reports of the Keio Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies 46. 145–74.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto, and Shaw, Jason A.. 2018. Persistence of prosody. Hana-bana : A festschrift for Junko Ito and Armin Mester, ed. by Bennett, Ryan, Angeles, Andrew, Brasoveanu, Adrian, Buckley, Dhyana, Kalivoda, Nick, Kawahara, Shigeto, McGuire, Grant, and Padgett, Jaye. Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz. Online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1jj5d27v.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. 1984a. Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language 60. 286319. DOI: 10.2307/413642.10.2307/413642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. 1984b. Universal phonetics and the organization of grammars. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 59. 3549. Online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2497n8jq.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. 1988. The phonology-phonetics interface. Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, vol. 1, ed. by Newmeyer, Frederick J., 281302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. 1990a. Phonetic representations in a generative grammar. Journal of Phonetics 18. 321–34. DOI: 10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30377-8.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30377-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. 1990b. The window model of coarticulation: Articulatory evidence. In Kingston & Beckman, 451–70. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511627736.026.10.1017/CBO9780511627736.026.10.1017/CBO9780511627736.026.10.1017/CBO9780511627736.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. 1996. The phonology-phonetics interface. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 92. 4560. Online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/26b4r9nw.Google Scholar
Kehrein, Wolfgang, and Golston, Chris. 2004. A prosodic theory of laryngeal contrasts. Phonology 21. 325–57. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675704000302.10.1017/S0952675704000302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1994a. Phonology in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1994b. Sonority-driven stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT, ms. Online: http://roa.rutgers.edu/article/view/34.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1997. Quality-sensitive stress. Rivista di Linguistica 9. 157–87. Online: https://www.italian-journal-linguistics.com/app/uploads/2021/06/6_Kenstowicz.pdf.Google Scholar
Kilbourn-Ceron, Oriana. 2017. Speech production planning affects variation in external sandhi. Montreal: McGill University dissertation. Online: https://escholarship.mcgill.ca/concern/theses/2j62s741q.Google Scholar
Kingston, John. 1984. The phonetics and phonology of the timing of oral and glottal events. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation. Online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1mx3m19m.Google Scholar
Kingston, John. 2007. The phonetics-phonology interface. In de Lacy, 401–34. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511486371.018.10.1017/CBO9780511486371.018.10.1017/CBO9780511486371.018.10.1017/CBO9780511486371.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, John, and Beckman, Mary E. (eds.) 1990. Papers in laboratory phonology 1: Between the grammar and physics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511627736.10.1017/CBO9780511627736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, John, and Diehl, Randy L.. 1994. Phonetic knowledge. Language 70. 419–54. DOI: 10.2307/416481.10.1353/lan.1994.0023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochetov, Alexei. 2020. Research methods in articulatory phonetics II: Studying other gestures and recent trends. Language and Linguistics Compass 14:e12371. DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12371.10.1111/lnc3.12371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochetov, Alexei, and Pouplier, Marianne. 2008. Phonetic variability and grammatical knowledge: An articulatory study of Korean place assimilation. Phonology 25. 399431. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675708001553.10.1017/S0952675708001553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondo, Mariko. 1994. Mechanisms of vowel devoicing in Japanese. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 1994), 6164. DOI: 10.21437/icslp.1994-19.10.21437/icslp.1994-19.10.21437/icslp.1994-19.10.21437/ICSLP.1994-19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondo, Mariko. 2008. Syllable structure and its acoustic effects on vowels in devoicing environments. Voicing in Japanese, ed. by van, Jeroen Weijer, de, Nanjo, Kensuke, and Nishihara, Tetsuo, 229–46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110197686.2.229.Google Scholar
Krivokapić, Jelena. 2022. Prosody in articulatory phonology. Prosodic theory and practice, ed. by Barnes, Jonathan and Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie, 213–36. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/10413.003.0008.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert, and Scobbie, James. 2003. External sandhi as gestural overlap? Counterevidence from Sardinian. Phonetic interpretation: Papers in laboratory phonology 6, ed. by Local, John, Ogden, Richard, and Temple, Rosalind, 164–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter, and Maddieson, Ian. 1996. The sounds of the world's languages. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lang-Rigal, Jennifer. 2014. A perceptual and experimental phonetic approach to dialect stereotypes: The tonada cordobesa of Argentina. Austin: University of Texas, Austin dissertation. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/2152/24771.Google Scholar
Lee-Kim, Sang-Im, Davidson, Lisa; and Hwang, Sangjin. 2013. Morphological effects on the darkness of English intervocalic /l/. Laboratory Phonology 4. 475511. DOI: 10.1515/lp-2013-0015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1972. The timing of utterances and linguistic boundaries. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51. 2018–24. DOI: 10.1121/1.1913062.10.1121/1.1913062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Mark, and Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1984. Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. Language sound structure: Studies in phonology presented to Morris Halle by his teacher and students, ed. by Aronoff, Mark and Oehrle, Richard, 157233. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lionnet, Florian. 2017. A theory of subfeatural representations: The case of rounding harmony in Laal. Phonology 34. 523–64. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675717000276.10.1017/S0952675717000276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LoCasto, Paul C., and Connine, Cynthia M.. 2002. Rule-governed missing information in spoken word recognition: Schwa vowel deletion. Perception & Psychophysics 64. 208–19. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195787.10.3758/BF03195787CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackenzie, Sara, Olson, Erin, Clayards, Meghan; and Wagner, Michael. 2018. North American /l/ both darkens and lightens depending on morphological constituency and segmental context. Laboratory Phonology 9:13. DOI: 10.5334/labphon.104.10.5334/labphon.104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, Joseph L. 1990. Pretonic lengthening: An early Hebrew sound change. Journal of the American Oriental Society 110. 460–71. DOI: 10.2307/603187.10.2307/603187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manuel, Sharon. 1999. Cross-language studies: Relating language-particular coarticulation patterns to other language-particular facts. In Hardcastle & Hewlett, 179–98. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511486395.009.10.1017/CBO9780511486395.009.10.1017/CBO9780511486395.009.10.1017/CBO9780511486395.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, Ignatius G. 1981. Phonetic representation and speech synthesis by rule. The cognitive representation of speech, ed. by Myers, Terry, Laver, John, and Anderson, John, 415–20. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Mazaudon, Martine, and Michaud, Alexis. 2008. Tonal contrasts and initial consonants: A case study of Tamang, a ‘missing link’ in tonogenesis. Phonetica 65. 231–56. DOI: 10.1159/000192794.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1981. Stress, pretonic strengthening, and syllabification in Tiberian Hebrew. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (Theoretical issues in the grammar of Semitic languages) 3. 73100.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1986. OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 207–63. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4178486.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1999. Sympathy and phonological opacity. Phonology 16. 331–99. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675799003784.10.1017/S0952675799003784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2007. Derivations and levels of representation. In de Lacy 2007a, 99117. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511486371.006.10.1017/CBO9780511486371.006.10.1017/CBO9780511486371.006.10.1017/CBO9780511486371.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2008. The serial interaction of stress and syncope. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 26. 499546. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-008-9051-3.10.1007/s11049-008-9051-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2011. Perceptually grounded faithfulness in harmonic serialism. Linguistic Inquiry 42. 171–83. DOI: 10.1162/LING_a_00035.10.1162/LING_a_00035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzerath, Paul, and de Oleza, José Maria. 1928. Spanische lautdauer: Eine experimentelle Untersuchung, mit 4 Abbildungen. 15 Figuren und 37 Tabellen. Berlin: W. de Gruyter & Company.10.1515/9783111729008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Amanda. 2013. C-V coarticulation in consonants with multiple lingual constrictions. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 19:060299. DOI: 10.1121/1.4800030.10.1121/1.4800030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mora-Marín, David. 2021. Reconstructing possession morphology in Mayan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 87. 369422. DOI: 10.1086/714250.10.1086/714250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mousikou, Petroula, Strycharczuk, Patrycja, Turk, Alice; and Scobbie, James M.. 2021. Coarticulation across morpheme boundaries: An ultrasound study of past-tense inflection in Scottish English. Journal of Phonetics 88:101101. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101101.10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mücke, Doris, Hermes, Anne; and Tilsen, Sam. 2020. Incongruencies between phonological theory and phonetic measurement. Phonology 37. 133–70. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675720000068.10.1017/S0952675720000068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munhall, Kevin, and Löfqvist, Anders. 1992. Gestural aggregation in speech: Laryngeal gestures. Journal of Phonetics 20. 111–26. DOI: 10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30242-6.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30242-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, James. 1995. The categorical and gradient phonology of variable t-deletion in English. Paper given at the International Workshop on Language Variation and Linguistic Theory, University of Nijmegen, September 1995.Google Scholar
Myers, Scott. 2000. Boundary disputes: The distinction between phonetic and phonological sound patterns. Phonological knowledge: Conceptual and empirical issues, ed. by Burton-Roberts, Noel, Carr, Philip, and Docherty, Gerard, 245–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Myers, Scott, and Hansen, Benjamin B.. 2007. The origin of vowel length neutralization in final position: Evidence from Finnish speakers. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25. 157–93. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-006-0001-7.10.1007/s11049-006-0001-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nam, Hosung, Goldstein, Louis; and Saltzman, Elliot. 2009. Self-organization of syllable structure: A coupled oscillator model. In Pellegrino et al., 297328. DOI: 10.1515/9783110223958.297.10.1515/9783110223958.297.10.1515/9783110223958.297.10.1515/9783110223958.297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nam, Hosung, Saltzman, Elliot, Krivokapić;, Jelena and Goldstein, Louis. 2008. Modeling the durational difference of stressed vs. unstressed syllables. Proceedings of the 8th Phonetic Conference of China, Beijing.Google Scholar
Odden, David. 1988. Anti antigemination and the OCP. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 451–75. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25164904.Google Scholar
Oh, Grace E., and Redford, Melissa A.. 2012. The production and phonetic representation of fake geminates in English. Journal of Phonetics 40. 8291. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.08.003.10.1016/j.wocn.2011.08.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oh, Sejin. 2021. Phonetic and phonological vowel reduction in Brazilian Portuguese. Phonetica 78. 435–65. DOI: 10.1515/phon-2021-2012.10.1515/phon-2021-2012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohala, John. 1983. The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. The production of speech, ed. by MacNeilage, Peter F., 189216. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4613-8202-7_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John. 1993. The phonetics of sound change. Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, ed. by Jones, Charles, 237–78. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Öhman, Sven E. G. 1966. Coarticulation in VCV utterances: Spectrographic measurements. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 39. 151–68. DOI: 10.1121/1.1909864.10.1121/1.1909864CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orlikoff, Robert F., Deliyski, Dimitar D., Baken, R. J.; and Watson, Ben C.. 2009. Validation of a glottographic measure of vocal attack. Journal of Voice 23. 164–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.08.004.10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.08.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, Steve. 2002. Quantifying the sonority hierarchy. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst dissertation. Online: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI3056268.Google Scholar
Parker, Steve. 2011. Sonority. In van Oostendorp et al., 1160–84. DOI: 10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0049.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0049.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0049.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrell, Benjamin. 2012. The role of gestural phasing in Western Andalusian Spanish aspiration. Journal of Phonetics 40. 3745. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.08.004.10.1016/j.wocn.2011.08.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paschen, Ludger, Fuchs, Susanne; and Seifart, Frank. 2022. Final lengthening and vowel length in 25 languages. Journal of Phonetics 94. 101–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2022.101179.10.1016/j.wocn.2022.101179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pater, Joe. 2000. Non-uniformity in English secondary stress: The role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. Phonology 17. 237–74. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675700003900.10.1017/S0952675700003900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, David, LoCasto;, Paul C. and Connine, Cynthia M.. 2003. Corpora analyses of frequency of schwa deletion in conversational American English. Phonetica 60. 4569. DOI: 10.1159/000070453.10.1159/000070453CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pellegrino, François, Chitoran, Ioana, Coupé;, Christophe and Marsico, Egidio (eds.) 2009. Approaches to phonological complexity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110223958.10.1515/9783110223958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1990. Phonological and phonetic representation. Journal of Phonetics 18. 375–94. DOI: 10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30380-8.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30380-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2002. Word-specific phonetics. In Gussenhoven & Warner, 101–40. DOI: 10.1515/9783110197105.1.101.10.1515/9783110197105.1.101.10.1515/9783110197105.1.101.10.1515/9783110197105.1.101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2016. Phonological representation: Beyond abstract versus episodic. Annual Review of Linguistics 2. 3352. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-125050.10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-125050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinho, Cátia M. R., Jesus, Luis M. T.; and Barney, Anna. 2012. Weak voicing in fricative production. Journal of Phonetics 40. 625–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2012.06.002.10.1016/j.wocn.2012.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plug, Leendert, Shitaw, Abdurraouf; and Heselwood, Barry. 2019. Inter-consonantal intervals in Tripolitanian Libyan Arabic: Accounting for variable epenthesis. Laboratory Phonology 10:5. DOI: 10.5334/labphon.122.10.5334/labphon.122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polian, Gilles. 2017. Morphology. In Aissen et al., 201–25.Google Scholar
Pouplier, Marianne. 2011. The atoms of phonological representations. In van Oostendorp et al., 107–29. DOI: 10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0005.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0005.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0005.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul. 2004 [1993]. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell. [Revision of 1993 technical report, Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science. Online: https://roa.rutgers.edu/article/view/547.].Google Scholar
Purse, Ruaridh. 2019. The articulatory reality of coronal stop ‘deletion’. Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Melbourne, 1595–99. Online: https://assta.org/proceedings/ICPhS2019/papers/ICPhS_1644.pdf.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel. 1999. Lingual coarticulation. In Hardcastle & Hewlett, 80104. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511486395.005.10.1017/CBO9780511486395.005.10.1017/CBO9780511486395.005.10.1017/CBO9780511486395.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recasens, Daniel, and Mira, Meritxell. 2012. Voicing assimilation in Catalan two-consonant clusters. Journal of Phonetics 40. 639–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2012.06.001.10.1016/j.wocn.2012.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redmon, Charles, and Jongman, Allard. 2018. Source characteristics of voiceless dorsal fricatives. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 144. 242–53. DOI: 10.1121/1.5045345.10.1121/1.5045345CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, Michael. 2003. Atlas lingüístico de Guatemala. Guatemala City: Instituto de Lingüístico y Educación de la Universidad Rafael Landívar.Google Scholar
Ridouane, Rachid, and Fougeron, Cécile. 2011. Schwa elements in Tashlhiyt word-initial clusters. Laboratory Phonology 2. 275300. DOI: 10.1515/labphon.2011.010.10.1515/labphon.2011.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, John S. 1992. The history of tense/aspect/mood/voice in the Mayan verbal complex. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Roon, Kevin, Hoole, Philip, Zeroual, Chakir, Du, Shihao; and Gafos, Adamantios I.. 2021. Stiffness and articulatory overlap in Moroccan Arabic consonant clusters. Laboratory Phonology 12:8. DOI: 10.5334/labphon.272.10.5334/labphon.272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saltzman, Elliot L., and Munhall, Kevin G.. 1989. A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecological Psychology 1. 333–82. DOI: 10.1207/s15326969eco0104_2.10.1207/s15326969eco0104_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saltzman, Elliot L., Nam, Hosung, Krivokapić;, Jelena and Goldstein, Louis. 2008. A task-dynamic toolkit for modeling the effects of prosodic structure on articulation. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2008, 175–84. Online: https://www.isca-speech.org/archive/speechprosody_2008/saltzman08_speechprosody.html.10.21437/SpeechProsody.2008-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Nathan. 2003. Opacity and sound change in the Polish lexicon. Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz dissertation.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1925. Sound patterns in language. Language 1. 3751. DOI: 10.2307/409004.10.2307/409004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1933. La réalité psychologique des phonèmes. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique, 247–65. [Reprinted in English in Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture, and personality, ed. by David, G. Mandelbaum, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1949; and Phonological theory: Evolution and current practice, ed. by Makkai, Valerie Bekker, New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1972.].Google Scholar
Scobbie, James M. 2007. Interface and overlap in phonetics and phonology. The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, ed. by Ramchand, Gillian and Reiss, Charles, 1752. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199247455.013.0002.Google Scholar
Seyfarth, Scott, Garellek, Marc, Gillingham, Gwendolyn, Ackerman, Farrell; and Malouf, Robert. 2018. Acoustic differences in morphologically-distinct homophones. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 33. 3249. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1359634.10.1080/23273798.2017.1359634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Jason A., Gafos, Adamantios, Hoole, Philip; and Zeroual, Chakir. 2009. Syllabification in Moroccan Arabic: Evidence from patterns of temporal stability in articulation. Phonology 26. 187215. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40467577.10.1017/S0952675709001754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Jason A., and Kawahara, Shigeto. 2018. The lingual articulation of devoiced /u/ in Tokyo Japanese. Journal of Phonetics 66. 100119. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2017.09.007.10.1016/j.wocn.2017.09.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shklovsky, Kirill, Pedro, Pedro Mateo; and Coon, Jessica (eds.) 2011. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (Proceedings of FAMLi 1: Formal Approaches to Mayan Linguistics) 63.Google Scholar
Smith, Caitlin. 2018. Harmony in gestural phonology. Los Angeles: University of Southern California dissertation.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer L. 2011. Category-specific effects. In van Oostendorp et al., 2439–63. DOI: 10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0102.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0102.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0102.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smorodinsky, Iris. 2002. Schwas with and without active control. New Haven, CT: Yale University dissertation.Google Scholar
Solé, Maria-Josep. 1992. Phonetic and phonological processes: The case of nasalization. Language and Speech 35. 2943. DOI: 10.1177/002383099203500204.10.1177/002383099203500204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solé, Maria-Josep. 1995. Spatio-temporal patterns of velopharyngeal action in phonetic and phonological nasalization. Language and Speech 38. 123. DOI: 10.1177/002383099503800101.10.1177/002383099503800101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solé, Maria-Josep. 2007. Controlled and mechanical properties in speech. Experimental approaches to phonology, ed. by Solé, Maria-Josep, Beddor, Patrice, and Ohala, Manjari, 302–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199296675.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solé, Maria-Josep. 2018. Articulatory adjustments in initial voiced stops in Spanish, French and English. Journal of Phonetics 66. 217–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2017.10.002.10.1016/j.wocn.2017.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sproat, Richard, and Fujimura, Osamu. 1993. Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation. Journal of Phonetics 21. 291311. DOI: 10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31340-3.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31340-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1990. Gestures and autosegments: Comments on Browman and Goldstein's paper. In Kingston & Beckman, 382–97.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1994. Complex onsets as single segments: The Mazateco pattern. Perspectives in phonology, ed. by Cole, Jennifer and Kisseberth, Charles, 203–91. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 2000. Paradigm uniformity and the phonetics-phonology boundary. Papers in laboratory phonology 5: Acquisition and the lexicon, ed. by Broe, Michael and Pierrehumbert, Janet, 313–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 2001. Directional asymmetries in place assimilation: A perceptual account. The role of speech perception in phonology, ed. by Johnson, Keith and Hume, Elizabeth, 219–50. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 2009. The phonology of perceptibility effects: The P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. The nature of the word: Studies in honor of Paul Kiparsky, ed. by Hanson, Kristin and Inkelas, Sharon, 151–79. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. 1989. On the quantal nature of speech. Journal of Phonetics 17. 345. DOI: 10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31520-7.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31520-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. 2000. Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Strycharczuk, Patrycja. 2012. Phonetics-phonology interactions in pre-sonorant voicing. Manchester: University of Manchester dissertation.Google Scholar
Strycharczuk, Patrycja. 2019. Phonetic detail and phonetic gradience in morphological processes. Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.616.Google Scholar
Strycharczuk, Patrycja, and Simon, Ellen. 2013. Obstruent voicing before sonorants: The case of West-Flemish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31. 563–88. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-013-9189-5.10.1007/s11049-013-9189-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, Kevin, and Bennett, Ryan. 2018. Contextual predictability influences word and morpheme duration in a morphologically complex language (Kaqchikel Mayan). The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 144. 9971017. DOI: 10.1121/1.5046095.10.1121/1.5046095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, Kevin, and Harris, John. 2014. A functional load account of geminate contrastiveness: A meta-study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Tilsen, Sam. 2016. Selection and coordination: The articulatory basis for the emergence of phonological structure. Journal of Phonetics 55. 5377. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.11.005.10.1016/j.wocn.2015.11.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toivonen, Ida, Blumenfeld, Lev, Gormley, Andrea, Hoiting, Leah, Logan, John, Ramlakhan, Nalini; and Stone, Adam. 2015. Vowel height and duration. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 32. 6471. Online: http://www.lingref.com/cpp/wccfl/32/abstract3157.html.Google Scholar
Turk, Alice E., and Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie. 2000. Word-boundary-related duration patterns in English. Journal of Phonetics 28. 397440. DOI: 10.1006/jpho.2000.0123.10.1006/jpho.2000.0123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turton, Danielle. 2017. Categorical or gradient? An ultrasound investigation of /l/-darkening and vocalization in varieties of English. Laboratory Phonology 8:13. DOI: 10.5334/labphon.35.10.5334/labphon.35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Us Maldonado, Juan Antonio. 2010. Gramática normativa Uspanteka. San Miguel Uspantán: Comunidad Lingüística Uspanteka.Google Scholar
Us Maldonado, Juan Antonio. n.d.(a). Chololtziij: Diccionario Uspanteko. San Miguel Uspantán: Comunidad Lingüística Uspanteka.Google Scholar
Us Maldonado, Juan Antonio. n.d.(b). Monografía Uspanteka: Aspectos culturales, lingüísticos y sociales de la Comunidad Lingüística Uspanteka. San Miguel Uspantán: Comunidad Lingüística Uspanteka.Google Scholar
van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin, Hume, Elizabeth; and Rice, Keren (eds.) 2011. The Blackwell companion to phonology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444335262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1972. Phonetic detail in assimilation: Problems in Germanic phonology. Language 48. 863–92. DOI: 10.2307/411992.10.2307/411992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vicente Méndez, Miguel Angel. 2007. Diccionario bilingüe uspanteko-español. Antigua, Guatemala: Oxlajuuj Keej Maya' Ajtz'iib' (OKMA).Google Scholar
Vitevitch, Michael S., and Luce, Paul A.. 2016. Phonological neighborhood effects in spoken word perception and production. Annual Review of Linguistics 2. 7594. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-124832.10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-124832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Anita, Ernestus, Mirjam; and Cutler, Anne. 2006. Formant transitions in fricative identification: The role of native fricative inventory. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120. 2267–77. DOI: 10.1121/1.2335422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, Douglas. 1984. The pronunciation of Canadian French. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Rachel, and Proctor, Michael. 2019. The organisation and structure of rhotics in American English rhymes. Phonology 36. 457–95. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675719000228.10.1017/S0952675719000228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Mary Ann. 2007. Repetition avoidance in human language. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/41694.Google Scholar
Westbury, John R., and Keating, Patricia A.. 1986. On the naturalness of stop consonant voicing. Journal of Linguistics 22. 145–66. DOI: 10.1017/S0022226700010598.10.1017/S0022226700010598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalen, D. H. 1990. Coarticulation is largely planned. Journal of Phonetics 18. 335. DOI: 10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30356-0.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30356-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Laurence, and Turk, Alice E.. 2010. English words on the Procrustean bed: Polysyllabic shortening reconsidered. Journal of Phonetics 38. 459–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.05.002.10.1016/j.wocn.2010.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanagawa, Mariko. 2003. Metathesis in Modern Hebrew: An analysis in articulatory phonology. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Barcelona, 1671–74. Online: https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2003/p15_1671.html.Google Scholar
Zsiga, Elizabeth C. 1997. Features, gestures, and Igbo vowels: An approach to the phonology-phonetics interface. Language 72. 227–74. DOI: 10.2307/416019.Google Scholar
Zsiga, Elizabeth C. 2000. Phonetic alignment constraints: Consonant overlap and palatalization in English and Russian. Journal of Phonetics 28. 69102. DOI: 10.1006/jpho.2000.0109.10.1006/jpho.2000.0109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zsiga, Elizabeth C. 2011. External sandhi in a second language: The phonetics and phonology of obstruent nasalization in Korean-accented English. Language 87. 289345. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2011.0031.10.1353/lan.2011.0031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zsiga, Elizabeth C. 2021. The phonology/phonetics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zuraw, Kie. 2010. A model of lexical variation and the grammar with application to Tagalog nasal substitution. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28. 417–72. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-010-9095-z.10.1007/s11049-010-9095-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuraw, Kie. 2016. Polarized variation. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 15. 145–71. DOI: 10.5565/rev/catjl.185.10.5565/rev/catjl.185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zymet, Jesse. 2018. Lexical propensities in phonology: Corpus and experimental evidence, grammar, and learning. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation. Online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0rz210sn.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bennett et al. supplementary material

Bennett et al. supplementary material
Download Bennett et al. supplementary material(File)
File 59 MB