Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-pksg9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-01-02T06:14:01.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The foot domain in Bambara

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Christopher R. Green
Christopher R. Green*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland—Center for Advanced Study of Language (CASL)
*
University of Maryland—CASL, 7005 52nd Avenue, College Park, MD 20742 [greencr@umd.edu]
Get access

Extract

Recent research has shed new light on the role and characteristics of prosodic domains, including segmental and tonal feet, in an array of languages. This research extends to African languages, but much work remains to be done. Tonal African languages are particularly problematic, as correlates of stress or metrical prominence are often not well defined or are absent altogether. In addition, descriptive work may omit details of the structure and function of prosodic domains. An exception to this is Bambara, where research implicates a pivotal role for foot structure in segmental and tonal processes. These processes reference a foot domain; however, there are conflicting accounts of certain defining characteristics of its structure. This article aims to challenge two long-held claims about Bambara prosodic structure. The data presented support a claim that all Bambara feet are uniformly trochaic and parsed from left to right in all instances. I intend to illustrate that Bambara segmental and tonal feet are a single, structurally unified prosodic entity.

Keywords

prosodic structurefoot domainBambaraMande languagesheadedness

Information

Type
Phonological Analysis
Information
Language , Volume 91 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. e1 - e26
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

I thank Amalia Gnanadesikan, Stuart Davis, and audiences at ACAL 42 and the 3rd Colloque Mandé for thoughtful discussion and feedback on aspects of this work. I am extremely grateful to Valentin Vydrine for his willingness to engage in friendly discussion and debate about our viewpoints on Mande prosodic structure. I also thank the coeditor and two referees for their comments and suggestions. Any remaining shortcomings are my responsibility.

References

Akinlabi, Akinbiyi, and Liberman, Mark. 2006. Tonal complexes and a Lokaa conspiracy. Globalization and the future of African languages, ed. by Egbokhare, Francis O. and Kolawole, Clement, 444–63. Ibadan: Ibadan Cultural Studies Group.Google Scholar
Akinlabi, Akinbiyi, and Urua, Eno. 2003. Foot structure in the Ibibio verb. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 24. 119–60.10.1515/jall.2003.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailleul, Charles. 2007. Dictionnaire Bambara-Français. 3rd edn. Bamako: Éditions Donniya.Google Scholar
Bamba, Moussa. 1991. De l'interaction entre tons et accent. Montreal: Université du Québec à Montréal dissertation.Google Scholar
Bearth, Thomas. 1971. L’énoncé Toura. Norman, OK: SIL International.Google Scholar
Bennett, Ryan. 2012. Foot-conditioned phonotactics and prosodic constituency. Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz dissertation.Google Scholar
Bennett, Ryan. 2013. The uniqueness of metrical structure: Rhythmic phonotactics in Huariapano. Phonology 30. 3. 355–98.10.1017/S0952675713000195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickmore, Lee. 1995. Tone and stress in Lamba. Phonology 12. 3. 307–41.10.1017/S0952675700002542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickmore, Lee. 2003. The use of feet to account for binary tone spreading: Evidence from Cilungu. Stress and tone—The African experience, ed. by Anyanwu, Rose-Juliet, 23–47. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Bird, Charles. 1966. Determination in Bambara. Journal of West African Languages 3. 511.Google Scholar
Bolli, Margrit. 1976. Étude prosodique du Dan (Blossé). Abidjan: Société Internationale de Linguistique.Google Scholar
Brunelle, Marc, and Pittayaporn, Pittayawat. 2012. Phonologically-constrained change: The role of the foot in monosyllabization and rhythmic shifts in Mainland Southeast Asia. Diachronica 29. 4. 411–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulibaly, Bakary. 1983. Le phénomène du rehaussement tonal en Jula. Mandenkan 6. 920.Google Scholar
Courtenay, Karen. 1974. On the nature of the Bambara tone system. Studies in African Linguistics 5. 303–23.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 1978. A propos de la tonologie du Bambara: Realisations tonales, systeme tonal et la modalité nominal ‘defini’. Afrique et langage 9. 5–70.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 1988. Le système tonale du Bambara standard. Grenoble: Centre de Linguistique Africaines de l’Université Stendhal.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 1992. Tonologie du Bambara: Bilan et perspectives. Mandenkan 24. 145.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2009. Le Malinké de Kita: Un parler mandingue de l'ouest du Mali. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2013. Le Maninka du Niokolo (Sénégal oriental). Mandenkan 49. 1–218.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis, and Grégoire, Claire. 1993. La notion de ton marqué dans l'analyse d'une opposition tonale binaire: Le cas du Mandingue. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 14. 107–54.10.1515/jall.1993.14.2.107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lacy, Paul. 2002. The interaction of tone and stress in optimality theory. Phonology 19. 1. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diarra, Boubacar. 1976. Etude acoustique et fonctionnelle des tons du Bambara. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence dissertation.Google Scholar
Dumestre, Gérard. 1987. Le Bambara du Mali: Essais de description linguistique. Paris: Sorbonne nouvelle/Institut des langue orientales thèse d’état.Google Scholar
Dumestre, Gérard. 2003. Grammaire fondamentale du Bambara. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Dumestre, Gérard. 2011. Dictionnaire Bambara-Français. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Dumestre, Gérard, and Hosaka, Michiyo. 2000. Observations sur le Bambara de Kolona (sud Mali). Mandenkan 36. 85–107.Google Scholar
Dwyer, David. 1976. The analysis of Bambara polarization. Studies in African Linguistics, Supplement 6. 27–38.Google Scholar
Elfner, Emily. 2012. Syntax-prosody interactions in Irish. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Amherst dissertation.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John A. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Green, Christopher R. 2010. Prosodic phonology in Bamana (Bambara): Syllable complexity, metrical structure, and tone. Bloomington: Indiana University dissertation.Google Scholar
Green, Christopher R. 2013. Formalizing the prosodic word domain in Bambara tonology. Journal of West African Languages 40. 1. 3–20.Google Scholar
Green, Christopher r., Anderson, Jonathan C.; and Obeng, Samuel G.. 2013. Interacting tonal processes in Susu. Mandenkan 50. 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Christopher R., and Davis, Stuart. 2014. Superadditivity and limitations on syllable complexity in Bambara words. Perspectives on phonological theory and development, in honor of Daniel A. Dinnsen, ed. by Farris-Trimble, Ashley W. and Barlow, Jessica A., 223–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Green, Christopher r., Davis, Stuart, Diakite, Boubacar; and Baertsch, Karen. 2014. On the role of margin phonotactics in Colloquial Bamana complex syllables. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32. 2. 499–536.10.1007/s11049-013-9208-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Christopher R., and Diakite, Boubacar. 2008. Emergent syllable complexity in Colloquial Bamana. Journal of West African Languages 35. 45–56.Google ScholarPubMed
Hannahs, S. J. 2009. Welsh svarabhakti: Sonority sequencing and foot structure. Journal of Celtic Linguistics 13. 21–44.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1985. Iambic and trochaic rhythm in stress rules. Berkeley Linguistics Society 11. 429–46. Online: http://elanguage.net/journals/bls/article/view/2405.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1989. The prosodic hierarchy in meter. Rhythm and meter, ed. by Kiparsky, Paul and Youmans, Gilbert, 201–60. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1995. Metrical stress theory: Principles and case-studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hermans, Ben. 2011. The Limburgian tonal accents are feet. Paper presented at the 19th Manchester Phonology Meeting, Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
Hyde, Brett. 2012. The odd-parity input problem in metrical stress theory. Phonology 9. 3. 383–431.10.1017/S0952675712000218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 1978. Historical tonology. Tone: A linguistic survey, ed. by Fromkin, Victoria A., 257–69. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2007. Universals of tone rules: 30 years later. Tones and tunes: Studies in word and sentence prosody, ed. by Riad, Tomas and Gussenhoven, Carlos, 1–34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko, and Mester, Armin. 2003. Weak layering and word binarity. A new century of phonology and phonological theory: A festschrift for Professor Shosuke Haraguchi on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, ed. by Honma, Takeru, Okazaki, Masao, Tabata, Toshiyuki, and Tanaka, Shin-ichi, 26–65. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko, and Mester, Armin. 2009. The extended prosodic word. Phonological domains: Universals and deviations, ed. by Kabak, Barış and Grijzenhout, Janet, 135–94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko, and Mester, Armin. 2010. Recursive prosodic phrasing in Japanese. Japanese/Korean linguistics 18, ed. by McClure, William and Dikken, Marcel den, 147–64. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko, and Mester, Armin. 2013. Prosodic subcategories in Japanese. Lingua 124. 2040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaker, Alessandro. 2010. Be careful what you throw out: Gemination and tonal feet in Weledeh Dogrib. Fieldwork and linguistic analysis in indigenous languages of the Americas, ed. by Berez, Andrea L., Mulder, Jean, and Rosenblum, Daisy, 203–22. Manoa: University of Hawai'i Press.Google Scholar
Konatè, Adama Farima, and Vydrine, Valentin. 1989. Le système phonologique du dialecte Bamana du Bèlèdugu (village de Diyòn). Mandenkan 17. 1–40.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, Natalia. 2007. Le status fonctionnel du pied phonologique en Gouro. Mandenkan 43. 13–45.Google Scholar
Le Saout, Grégoire. 1979. Notes sur la phonologie du Gouro (zone de Zuénoula). Nice: CEPLAN.Google Scholar
Leben, William R. 1973. Suprasegmental phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Leben, William R. 1997. Tonal feet and the adaptation of English borrowing into Hausa. Studies in African Linguistics 25. 139–54.Google Scholar
Leben, William R. 2002. Tonal feet. Typology of African Prosodic Systems Workshop, ed. by Gut, Ulrike and Gibbon, Dayfdd. Bielefeld: Universität Bielefeld. Online: http://www.spectrum.uni-bielefeld.de/TAPS/proceedings.html.Google Scholar
Leben, William R. 2003. Tonal feet as tonal domains. Trends in African linguistics 5: Linguistic typology and representation of African languages, ed. by Mugane, John, 129–38. Trenton: Africa World Press.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark Y. 1975. The intonational system of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Martínez-Paricio, Violeta. 2013. An exploration of minimal and maximal metrical feet. Tromsø: University of Tromsø dissertation.Google Scholar
Mountford, Keith W. 1983. Bambara declarative sentence intonation. Bloomington: Indiana University dissertation.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina, and Vogel, Irene. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Pearce, Mary. 2006. The interaction between metrical structure and tone in Kera. Phonology 23. 2. 259–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, Mary. 2007. Iambicity in Kera. Annual Conference on African Linguistics (ACAL) 37. 66–76. Online: http://www.lingref.com/cpp/acal/37/paper1596.pdf.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan. 1991. Quantitative consequences of rhythmic organization. Chicago Linguistic Society (Parasession on the syllable in phonetics and phonology) 26. 2. 355–98.Google Scholar
Rialland, Annie, and Badjimé, Mamadou (Sangaré). 1989. Réanalyse des tons du Bambara: Des tons du nom à l'organisation générale du système. Studies in African Linguistics 20. 1–28.10.32473/sal.v20i1.107455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanogo, Mamadou Lamine. 1995. Tons, segments et règles transformationnelles en Jula. Mandenkan 30. 41–54.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1978. On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. Nordic prosody, ed. by Fretheim, Thorstein, 111–40. Trondeim: TAPIR.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1981. On the nature of phonological representation. The cognitive representation of speech, ed. by Anderson, John M., Laver, John, and Myers, Terry, 379–88. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1986. On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3. 371–405.10.1017/S0952675700000695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1996. The prosodic structure of function words. Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition, ed. by Moran, James L. and Demuth, Katherine, 187–213. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface. The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd edn., ed. by Goldsmith, John, Riggle, Jason, and Yu, Alan C. L., 435–84. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spears, Richard A. 1968. Tonal dissimilation in Maninka. Journal of African Languages 7. 88–100.Google Scholar
Spears, Richard A. 1973. Elementary Maninka-kan. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Vydrine, Valentin. 2002. Some hasty notes on the ways of the evolution of Mande tonal systems. Lexical and structural diffusion, ed. by Nicolaï, Robert and Zima, Petr, 243–64. Nice: Faculté des Lettres, Arts et Sciences Humaines, Université de Nice.Google Scholar
Vydrine, Valentin. 2003. Le phonologie Gouro: Deux décennies après Le Saout. Mandenkan 38. 89–113.Google Scholar
Vydrine, Valentin. 2010. Le pied métrique dans les langues Mandé. Essais de typologie et de linguistique générale: Mélanges offerts à Denis Creissels, ed. by Floricic, Franck, 53–62. Lyon: ENS Éditions.Google Scholar
Weidman, Scott, and Rose, Sharon. 2006. A foot-based reanalysis of edge-in tonal phenomena in Bambara. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 25. 42634.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira. 1996. Feet, tonal reduction, and speech rate at the word and phrase level in Chinese. Feet, tonal reduction, and speech rate at the word and phrase level in Chinese: University College London, ms. Rutgers Optimality Archive 159. Online: http://roa.rutgers.edu/artide/view/170.Google Scholar
Zec, Draga. 1999. Footed tones and tonal feet: Metrical constituency in a pitch accent language. Phonology 16. 2. 225–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoll, Cheryl. 1998. Positional asymmetries and licensing. Positional asymmetries and licensing: MIT, ms. Rutgers Optimality Archive 282. Online: http://roa.rutgers.edu/article/view/292.Google Scholar