Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-fnvtc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-01-02T07:15:29.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comment on Harris'S ‘From morpheme to utterance’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Robert Levine
Robert Levine*
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University*
*
[levine.1@osu.edu]
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Commentary
Information
Language , Volume 100 , Issue 3 , September 2024 , pp. 573 - 578
Copyright
Copyright © 2024 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

My earnest thanks to the editors at Language for guidance and encouragement in the preparation of this commentary, and to Geoff Pullum for some very helpful input along the way. The usual disclaimers apply.

References

Casadio, Claudia, and Lambek, Joachim. 2002. A tale of four grammars. Studia Logica 71. 315–29. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020564714107.10.1023/A:1020564714107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1955. The logical structure of linguistic theory. [Published (in part) by Plenum Press, 1975.].Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. by Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S. 1946. From morpheme to utterance. Language 22. 161–83. DOI: 10.2307/410205. [Reprinted, Language 100(3). 552–72, 2024.].10.2307/410205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Zellig S. 1951. Structural linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S. 1966. A cycling cancellation-automaton for sentence well-formedness. International Computation Centre Bulletin 5. 69–94.Google Scholar
Lambek, Joachim. 1958. The mathematics of sentence structure. The American Mathematical Monthly 65. 154–70. DOI: 10.1080/00029890.1958.11989160.10.1080/00029890.1958.11989160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambek, Joachim. 2006. Pregroups and natural language processing. The Mathematical Intelligencer 28. 41–48. DOI: 10.1007/BF02987155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambek, Joachim. 2008. From word to sentence. Milan: Polimetrica.Google Scholar
Lambek, Joachim. 2013. From rules of grammar to laws of nature. Montreal: McGill University, ms.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2011. On the mathematical foundations of Syntactic structures. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20. 277–96. DOI: 10.1007/s10849-011-9139-8.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2013. The central question in comparative syntactic metatheory. Mind and Language 28. 492–521. DOI: 10.1111/mila.12029.10.1111/mila.12029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seuren, Pieter A. M. 2009. Concerning the roots of transformational generative grammar. Historigraphia Linguistica 36. 97–115. DOI: 10.1075/hl.36.1.05seu.10.1075/hl.36.1.05seuCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, Rulon S. 1947. Immediate constituents. Language 23. 81–117. DOI: 10.2307/410382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar