Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-m4fzj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-01-07T17:31:11.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond caricatures: Commentary on Evans 2014

Review products

The language myth: Why language is not an instinct. By EvansVyvyan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Pp. xi, 304. ISBN 9781107619753. $29.99.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Farrell Ackerman  and
Robert Malouf
Farrell Ackerman*
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Robert Malouf*
Affiliation:
San Diego State University
*
Ackerman, Department of Linguistics, UC San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA920930-0101 [fackerman@ucsd.edu]
Malouf, Department of Linguistics and Asian/Middle Eastern Languages, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182-7727, [rmalouf@mail.sdsu.edu]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Alternative (Re)views
Information
Language , Volume 92 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 189 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ambridge, Ben, Pine, Julian Μ.; and Lieven, Elena V. Μ.. 2014. Child language acquisition: Why universal grammar doesn’t help. Language 90. 3.e53-e90. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2014.0051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth, Elman, Jeffrey, Johnson, Mark H., Karmiloff-Smith, Annette, Parisi, Domenico; and Plunkett, Kim. 1995. Rethinking innateness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, Patrick, and Gluckman, Peter. 2011. Plasticity, robustness, development and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumberg, Mark. 2005. Basic instinct: The genesis of behavior. New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press.Google Scholar
Chater, Nick, Clark, Alexander, Goldsmith, John A.; and Perfors, Amy. 2015. Empiricism and learnability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1967. A review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal behavior. Readings in the psychology of language, ed. by Jakobovits, Leon A. and Miron, Murray S., 142–43. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [Review originally published in Language 35. 1.26-58, 1959. DOI: 10.2307/411334.].Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2011. Language and other cognitive systems: What is special about language? Language Learning and Development 7. 263–78. DOI: 10.1080/15475441.2011.584041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Alexander, and Lappin, Shalom. 2011. Linguistic nativism and the poverty of the stimulus. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Peter, Hermon, Gabriella; and Yanti, . 2015. Grammar of binding in the languages of the world: Innate or learned? Cognition 141. 138–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Culbertson, Jennifer, Smolensky, Paul; and Legendre, Géraldine. 2012. Learning biases predict a word order universal. Cognition 122. 306–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Culbertson, Jennifer, Smolensky, Paul; and Wilson, Colin. 2013. Cognitive biases, linguistic universals, and constraint-based grammar learning. Topics in Cognitive Science 5. 392–424. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Culicover, Peter W., and Jackendoff, Ray. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Epstein, Joshua M. 2006. Generative social science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan. 2014. The language myth: Why language is not an instinct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2013. Substantive learning bias or an effect of familiarity? Comment on Culbertson, Smolensky, and Legendre (2012). Cognition 127. 420–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jabloňka, Eva, and Lamb, Marion J.. 2005. Evolution in four dimensions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray, and Pinker, Steven. 2005. The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition 97. 211–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.04.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, John E. 2002. From Whitney to Chomsky: Essays in the history of American linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, David S. 2001. The dependent gene: The fallacy of ‘vs. nurture’. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Oyama, Susan, Gray, Russell D.; and Griffiths, Paul E.. 2001. Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems theory and evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pearl, Lisa. 2014. Evaluating learning-strategy components: Being fair (Commentary on Ambridge, Pine, and Lieven). Language 90. 3.e107–e114. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2014.0048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1994. The language instinct. NewYork: William Morrow & Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 2013. Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl R. 1945. The open society and its enemies: The spell of Plato. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Prinz, Jesse J. 2012. Beyond human nature: How culture and experience shape the human mind. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Ross, Haj. 1982. Human linguistics. Contemporary perceptions of language: Interdisciplinary dimensions (Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics), 1–30. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. 1997. Educating Eve. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. 2005. The ‘language instinct’ debate. Revised edn. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1967. On arguing with Mr. Katz: A brief rejoinder. Foundations of Language 3. 284–87. Online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25000282.Google Scholar