Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-m4fzj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-01-02T14:40:47.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deriving verb-initial word order in Mayan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Lauren Clemens  and
Jessica Coon
Lauren Clemens*
Affiliation:
University at Albany, SUNY
Jessica Coon*
Affiliation:
McGill University
*
[lclemens@albany.edu]
[jessica.coon@mcgill.ca]
Get access

Abstract

Individual languages in the Mayan family display either rigid VSO or alternating VOS/VSO word orders (England 1991). In this article we review problems with previous accounts of Mayan word order and argue that verb-initial (V1) order is consistently derived by head movement of the verb to a position above the subject and below Infl0, which accounts for uniformity in verb-stem formation across the family. After an in-depth examination of the factors that have been reported to determine postverbal argument order, we present three distinct paths to VOS: (i) postsyntactic reordering of NP objects (following Clemens 2014, 2017), (ii) right-side subject topicalization (Can Pixabaj 2004, Curiel 2007), and (iii) heavy-NP shift (Larsen 1988). This account makes testable predictions in the domains of word order and prosodic constituency and has implications for the derivation of verb-initial order crosslinguistically.

Keywords

verb-initial languagesMayan languagesCh'olword orderhead-raisingsyntax-prosody interface

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 94 , Issue 2 , June 2018 , pp. 237 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

We are extremely grateful to Morelia Vázquez Martínez, Virginia Martínez Vázquez, Nicolás Arcos López, and Juan Jesús Vázquez Álvarez for Ch'ol data and discussion, and to Pedro Mateo Pedro and B'alam Mateo Toledo for Q'anjob'al. For reading and commenting on previous versions of this article, we thank Judith Aissen, Scott AnderBois, John Beavers, Nora England, Vera Gribanova, and Robert Henderson, and three referees. Many thanks also to Grant Armstrong, Ryan Bennett, George Aaron Broadwell, Michael Diercks, Jaime Douglas, Emily Elfner, Heidi Harley, Caitlin Keenan, David Pesetsky, Omer Preminger, Nina Radke-vich, Rodrigo Ranero, Stuart Robinson, Michelle Sheehan, Gary Thoms, Joey Windsor, and audiences at FAMLi 3, SSILA 2015, WSCLA 2016, NELS 2016, and CILLA 2017 for helpful comments and discussion at various stages of this work. Special thanks to Justin Royer for research assistance.

References

Adger, David, and Svenonius, Peter. 2011. Features in minimalist syntax. The Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism, ed. by Boeckx, Cedric, 27–51. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aissen, Judith. 1987. Tzotzil clause structure. Reidel: Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-009-3741-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aissen, Judith. 1992. Topic and focus in Mayan. Language 68(1). 43–80. DOI: 10.2307/416369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aissen, Judith. 1997. On the syntax of obviation. Language 73(4). 705-50. DOI: 10.1353/lan.1997.0042.10.1353/lan.1997.0042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aissen, Judith. 2016. Los tópicos al extremo derecho en tsotsil. Paper presented at Form and Analysis in Mayan Linguistics 4 (FAMLi 4), Universidad de Oriente, Yucatan, Mexico.Google Scholar
Aissen, Judith, England, Nora C.; and Maldonado, Roberto Zavala (eds.) 2017. The Mayan languages. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315192345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, Grant. 2017. The syntax of non-verbal predication in Yucatec Maya. Cuadernos de Lingüística 4(2). 137–212. DOI: 10.24201/clecm.v4i2.73.Google Scholar
Avelino, Heriberto. 2011. Intonational patterns of topic and focus constructions in Yucatec Maya. New perspectives in Mayan linguistics, ed. by Avelino, Heriberto, 56–79. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1985. The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16(3). 373–415. Online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178442.Google Scholar
Ball, Douglas. 2009. Clause structure and argument realization in Tongan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University dissertation.Google Scholar
Baquiax Barreno, Modesto, Mateo, Rigoberto Juárez, Mejía, Fernando Rodríguez; and Pérez, María Magdalena. 2005. Yaq'b‘anil stxolilal ti’ Q'anjob‘al: Gramática descriptiva Q'anjob‘al. Guatemala City: Academia de Lenguas Mayas de Guatemala.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana, and Shlonsky, Ur. 1995. The order of verbal complements: A comparative study. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13(3). 489–526. DOI: 10.1007/BF00992739.10.1007/BF00992739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Ryan, Coon, Jessica; and Henderson, Robert. 2016. Introduction to Mayan linguistics. Language and Linguistics Compass 10(10). 455-68. DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12159.10.1111/lnc3.12159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Ryan, Elfner, Emily; and McCloskey, James. 2016. Lightest to the right: An apparently anomalous displacement in Irish. Linguistic Inquiry 47(2). 169–234. DOI: 10.1162/LING_a_00209.10.1162/LING_a_00209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Ryan, Harizanov, Boris; and Henderson, Robert. 2018. Prosodic smothering in Macedonian and Kaqchikel. Linguistic Inquiry 49(2). 195–246. DOI: 10.1162/LING_a_00272.10.1162/LING_a_00272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinstein, Ava. 1991. The role of intonation in K'ekchi Mayan discourse. Texas Linguistic Forum (Discourse) 32. 1–19.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2009. Linking without grammatical relations in Yucatec: Alignment, extraction, and control. Issues in functional-typological linguistics and language theory: A festschrift for Christian Lehmann on the occasion of his 60th birthday, ed. by Nishina, Yoko, Shin, Yong-Min, Skopeteas, Stavros, Verhoeven, Elisabeth, and Helmbrecht, Johannes, 185–214. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2008. What will you have, DP or NP? North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 37. 101-14.Google Scholar
Broadwell, George Aaron. 2000. Word order and markedness in Kaqchikel. Proceedings of the LFG '00 Conference, 44–62. Online: http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/LFG5-2000/pdfs/lfg00broadwell.pdf.Google Scholar
Brody, Jill. 1984. Some problems with the concept of basic word order. Linguistics 22(5). 711-36. DOI: 10.1515/ling.1984.22.5.711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buenrostro, Cristina. 2013. La voz en Chuj de San Mateo Ixtatán. Mexico City: El Colegio de México dissertation.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, and Kaufman, Terrence. 1985. Mayan linguistics: Where are we now? Annual Review of Anthropology 14(1). 187-98. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.an.14.100185.001155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Can Pixabaj, Telma. 2004. La topicalización en K'ichee': Una perspectiva discursiva. Guatemala City: Universidad Rafael Landívar BA thesis.Google Scholar
Can Pixabaj, Telma. 2006. Gramática descriptiva Uspanteka. Antigua Guatemala: Oxlajuuj Keej Maya' Ajtz'iib'.Google Scholar
Carnie, Andrew, and Guilfoyle, Eithne (eds.) 2000. The syntax of verb initial languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Franklin. 2009. Learning to order words: A connectionist model of heavy NP shift and accessibility effects in Japanese and English. Journal of Memory and Language 61(3). 374-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.07.006.10.1016/j.jml.2009.07.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6(4). 339–405. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008324218506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. Bare phrase structure. Government and binding theory and the minimalist program: Principles and parameters in syntactic theory, ed. by Webelhuth, Gert, 385–439. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Martin, Roger, Michaels, David, and Uriagereka, Juan, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. by Kenstowicz, Michael, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra. 1978. Case marking and grammatical relations in Polynesian. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra. 2006. Properties of VOS languages. The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 3, ed. by Everaert, Martin and Riemsdijk, Henk van, 685–720. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996591.ch52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, Sandra. 2017. VOS languages: Some of their properties. The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd edn., ed. by Everaert, Martin and Riemsdijk, Henk van. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom069.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra, and Ladusaw, William A.. 2003. Restriction and saturation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5927.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1994. On the evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP. Paths towards universal grammar: Studies in honor of Richard S. Kayne, ed. by Cinque, Guglielmo, 85–110. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Clemens, Lauren. 2013. V2 in a V1 language: Kaqchikel SVO. Studies in Kaqchikel grammar (MIT working papers on endangered and less familiar languages 8), ed. by Kenstowicz, Michael, 1–24. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clemens, Lauren. 2014. Prosodic noun incorporation and verb-initial syntax. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University dissertation.Google Scholar
Clemens, Lauren. 2017. Prosodic noun incorporation: The relationship between prosody and argument structure in Niuean. Albany: University at Albany, SUNY, ms.Google Scholar
Clemens, Lauren, and Coon, Jessica. 2018. Prosodic constituency of verb-initial clauses in Ch'ol. Proceedings of the 21st Workshop on Structure and Constituency in Languages of the Americas (WSCLA 2016), 88–100. Online: https://lingpapers.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2018/01/WSCLA21-07-Clemens_Coon.pdf.Google Scholar
Clemens, Lauren, and Polinsky, Maria. 2017. Verb-initial word orders, primarily in Austronesian and Mayan languages. The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd edn., ed. by Everaert, Martin and Riemsdijk, Henk van. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom056.Google Scholar
Coon, Jessica. 2010. VOS as predicate fronting in Chol. Lingua 120(2). 345-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coon, Jessica. 2013. Aspects of split ergativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199858743.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coon, Jessica. 2017a. Ch'ol. In Aissen et al., 648-84.Google Scholar
Coon, Jessica. 2017b. Little-v0 agreement and templatic morphology in Ch'ol. Syntax 20(2). 101-37. DOI: 10.1111/synt.12135.10.1111/synt.12135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coon, Jessica. 2018. Building verbs in Chuj: Consequences for the nature of roots. Journal of Linguistics. DOI: 10.1017/S0022226718000087.10.1017/S0022226718000087.10.1017/S0022226718000087.10.1017/S0022226718000087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coon, Jessica, and Henderson, Robert. 2011. Two binding puzzles in Mayan. Representing language: Essays in honor of Judith Aissen, ed. by Bravo, Rodrígo Gutiérrez, Mikkelsen, Line, and Potsdam, Eric, 51–67. Santa Cruz: Linguistics Research Center, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Coon, Jessica, Pedro, Pedro Mateo; and Preminger, Omer. 2014. The role of case in A-bar extraction asymmetries: Evidence from Mayan. Linguistic Variation 14(2). 179–242. DOI: 10.1075/lv.14.2.01coo.10.1075/lv.14.2.01cooCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coon, Jessica, and Preminger, Omer. 2013. Transitivity in Chol: A new argument for the split-VP hypothesis. North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 41. 127-42.Google Scholar
Craig, Colette Grinevald. 1979. The antipassive and Jacaltec. Papers in Mayan linguistics, ed. by Martin, Laura, 137-63. Columbia, MO: Lucas Brothers.Google Scholar
Craig, Colette Grinevald. 1986. Jacaltec noun classifiers: A study in grammaticalization. Lingua 70(4). 241-84. DOI: 10.1016/0024-3841(86)90046-X.10.1016/0024-3841(86)90046-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curiel, Alejandro. 2007. Estructura de la información, enclíticos y configuración sintáctica en tojol'ab'al. San Cristobal, Mexico: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social MA thesis.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Amy. 1991. Plains Cree morphosyntax. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta. 2011. Hindi pseudo-incorporation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29(1). 123-67. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-011-9118-4.10.1007/s11049-011-9118-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayley, Jon. 1981. Voice and ergativity in Mayan languages. Journal of Mayan Linguistics 2. 3–82.Google Scholar
Dayley, Jon. 1985. Tzutujil grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
de Lacy, Paul. 2004. Maximal words and the Maori passive. Optimality theory in phonology: A reader, ed. by McCarthy, John J., 495–512. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756171.ch27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobashi, Yoshihito. 2003. Phonological phrasing and syntactic derivation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University dissertation.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2005. Order of subject, object, and verb. The world atlas of language structures, ed. by Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David, and Comrie, Bernard, 330-33. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Updated version: World atlas of language structures online, ed. by Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, 2013. Online: http://wals.info/chapter/81.].Google Scholar
Du Bois, John William. 1981. The Sacapultec language. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John William. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63(4). 805-55. DOI: 10.2307/415719.Google Scholar
Elfner, Emily. 2012. Syntax-prosody interactions in Irish. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Amherst dissertation.Google Scholar
Elfner, Emily. 2015. Recursion in prosodic phrasing: Evidence from Connemara Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33(4). 1169–1208. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-014-9281-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embick, David, and Noyer, Rolf. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32(4). 555-95. DOI: 10.1162/002438901753373005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 2000. Lexicon and grammar: The English syntacticon. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
England, Nora C. 1991. Changes in basic word order in Mayan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 57(4). 446-86. DOI: 10.1086/ijal.57.4.3519735.10.1086/ijal.57.4.3519735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
England, Nora C. 2003. Mayan language revival and revitalization politics: Linguists and linguistic ideologies. American Anthropologist 105(4). 733-43. DOI: 10.1525/aa.2003.105.4.733.10.1525/aa.2003.105.4.733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
England, Nora C., and Martin, Laura. 2003. Issues in the comparative argument structure analysis in Mayan narratives. Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function, ed. by Du Bois, John W., Kumpf, Lorraine E., and Ashby, William J., 131-57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
England, Nora C., and Maldonado, Roberto Zavala. 2013. Mayan languages. Oxford bibliographies in linguistics, ed. by Aronoff, Mark. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/OBO/9780199772810-0147.Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline. 2011. German sentence accents and embedded prosodic phrases. Lingua 121(13). 1906-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.07.005.10.1016/j.lingua.2011.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinevald, Colette, and Peake, Marc. 2012. Ergativity and voice in Mayan: A functional-typological approach. Ergativity, valency and voice, ed. by Authier, Gilles and Haude, Katharina, 15–49. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110227734.15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez Bravo, Rodrigo. 2011. External and internal topics in Yucatec Maya. Representing language: Linguistic essays in honor of Judith Aissen, ed. by Bravo, Rodrigo Gutiérrez, Mikkelsen, Line, and Potsdam, Eric, 105-19. Santa Cruz: Linguistics Research Center, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Bravo, Rodrigo, and Madera, Jorge Monforte y. 2008. La alternancia sujeto inicial/verbo inicial y la teoría de la optimidad. Teoría de optimidad: Estudios de sintaxis y fonología, ed. by Bravo, Rodrigo Gutiérrez and Zendejas, E. Herrera, 61–90. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Bravo, Rodrigo, and Madera, Jorge Monforte y. 2010. On the nature of word order in Yucatec Maya. Information structure in indigenous languages of the Americas, ed. by José, Camacho, Bravo, Rodrigo Gutiérrez, and Sánchez, Liliana, 139-70. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Halpert, Claire. 2015. Argument licensing and agreement. (Studies in comparative syntax.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190256470.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2017. The ‘bundling’ hypothesis and the disparate functions of little v. The verbal domain, ed. by D'Alessandro, Roberta, Franco, Irene, and Gallego, Angél J., 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, Robert. 2012. Morphological alternations at the intonational phrase edge: The case of K'ichee'. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30(3). 741-87. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-012-9170-8.10.1007/s11049-012-9170-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiraiwa, Ken. 2005. Dimensions of symmetry in syntax: Agreement and clausal architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Hofling, Charles. 1984. On Proto-Yucatecan word order. Journal of Mayan Linguistics 4. 35–64.Google Scholar
Hofling, Charles. 2000. Itzaj Maya grammar. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 1986. Word order and syntactic features in the Scandinavian languages and English. Stockholm: University of Stockholm dissertation.Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon, and Zec, Draga. 1990. Prosodically constrained syntax. The phonology-syntax connection, ed. by Inkelas, Sharon and Zec, Draga, 365-78. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, and Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2007. Major phrase, focus intonation, multiple spell-out (MaP, FI, MSO). The Linguistic Review 24(2/3). 137-67. DOI: 10.1515/TLR.2007.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itõ, Junko, and Mester, Armin. 2007. Prosodic adjunction in Japanese compounds. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (Proceedings of FAJL 4: Formal approaches to Japanese linguistics) 55. 97–111.Google Scholar
Itõ, Junko, and Mester, Armin. 2010. Recursive prosodic phrasing in Japanese. The proceedings of the 18th Japanese/Korean Conference, 147-64. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan. 2004. The syntax of sentential stress. Toronto: University of Toronto dissertation.Google Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen. 1985. Connected speech: The interaction of syntax and phonology. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Ronald, and Bresnan, Joan. 1982. Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. The mental representation of grammatical relations, ed. by Bresnan, Joan, 173–281. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ketner, Katherine H. 2006. Size restrictions in prosodic morphology. Cambridge: University of Cambridge dissertation.Google Scholar
Klaiman, Miriam H. 1991. Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. Phrase structure and the lexicon, ed. by Rooryck, Johan and Zaring, Laurie, 109-37. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika, and Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2007. Phase theory and prosodic spellout: The case of verbs. The Linguistic Review 24(2/3). 93–135. DOI: 10.1515/TLR.2007.005.10.1515/TLR.2007.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kügler, Frank, and Skopeteas, Stavros. 2007. On the universality of prosodic reflexes of contrast: The case of Yucatec Maya. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Saarbrücken, 1025-28. Online: http://www.icphs2007.de/conference/Papers/1188/1188.pdf.Google Scholar
Kügler, Frank, Skopeteas, Stavros; and Verhoeven, Elisabeth. 2007. Encoding information structure in Yucatec Maya: On the interplay of prosody and syntax. Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 8. 187–208. Online: https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/1755.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1981. Topic, antitopic and verb agreement in non-standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pb.ii.6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1995. Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Larsen, Thomas. 1988. Manifestations of ergativity in Quiché grammar. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.Google Scholar
Levin, Theodore. 2015. Licensing without case. Cambidge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Massam, Diane. 2001. Pseudo noun incorporation in Niuean. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19(1). 153-97. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006465130442.10.1023/A:1006465130442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateo-Toledo, Eladio (B'alam). 2003. The use of languages' names: The Mayan case. International Journal of American Linguistics 69(2). 151-53. DOI: 10.1086/379682.10.1086/379682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateo Toledo, Eladio. 2008. The family of complex predicates in Q'anjob'al (Maya): Their syntax and meaning. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin dissertation. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/2152/18289.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Judith. 1975. San Mateo Chuj: A VOS language that paid the price. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Judith. 1976. Chuj intransitives: Or when can an intransitive verb take an object? Journal of Mayan Linguistics 1. 128-40.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J., and Prince, Alan. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. Papers in optimality theory (University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics 18), ed. by Beckman, Jill N., Dickey, Laura Walsh, and Urbanczyk, Suzanne, 249–384. Amherst: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
Minkoff, Seth. 2000. Animacy hierarchies and sentence processing. In Carnie & Guilfoyle, 201-12.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1984. The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60(4). 847-94. DOI: 10.2307/413800.10.1353/lan.1984.0038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondloch, James. 1978. Disambiguating subjects and objects in Quiché. Journal of Mayan Linguistics 1. 3–19.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina, and Vogel, Irene. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Kuniko Y. 2005. Kiche intonation. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 104. 45–60. Online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/52n7344j.Google Scholar
Norman, William. 1977. Topic and focus in Mayan. Paper presented at the Mayan Workshop II, San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico.Google Scholar
Norman, William, and Campbell, Lyle. 1978. Toward a Proto-Mayan syntax: A comparative perspective on grammar. Papers in Mayan linguistics 2 (Miscellaneous publications in anthropology 6), ed. by England, Nora, 136-56. Columbia: University of Missouri.Google Scholar
Pearson, Matthew. 2005. The Malagasy subject/topic as an A′-element. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23(2). 381–457. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-004-1582-7.10.1007/s11049-004-1582-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peñalosa, Fernando. 1987. Major syntactic structures of Acatec (dialect of San Miguel Acatán). International Journal of American Linguistics 53(3). 281–310. DOI: 10.1086/466059.10.1086/466059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez Vail, José Reginaldo. 2014. La inversión y obviación en el mam de Cajolá. Mexico City: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social MA thesis.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David, and Torrego, Esther. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation, ed. by Karimi, Simin, Samiian, Vida, and Wilkins, Wendy K., 262-94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Polian, Gilles. 2013. Gramática del tseltal de Oxchuc. Mexico City: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria. 2016. Deconstructing ergativity: Two types of ergative languages and their features. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190256586.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, Carl, and Sag, Ivan. 1994. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul. 1993. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. RUCCS Technical Report 2. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002. Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Quizar, Robin. 1979. Comparative word order in Mayan. Boulder: University of Colorado Boulder dissertation.Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin. 2016. Contiguity theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Stuart. 2002. Constituent order in Tenejapa Tzeltal. International Journal of American Linguistics 68(1). 51–80. DOI: 10.1086/466479.10.1086/466479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Sara Thomas. 1989. Two types of noun incorporation: A lexical analysis. Language 65(2). 294–317. DOI: 10.2307/415334.10.2307/415334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Royer, Justin. 2016. Systems of nominal classification in Chuj. Montreal: Concordia University BA thesis.Google Scholar
Saito, Mamoru. 2012. Sentence types and the Japanese right periphery. Discourse and grammar: From sentence types to lexical categories, ed. by Grewendorf, Günther and Zimmermann, Thomas Ede, 147-78. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface. The handbook of phonological theory, ed. by Goldsmith, John, Riggle, Jason, and Yu, Alan C. L., 435-84. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sells, Peter. 1985. Lectures on contemporary syntactic theories. (CSLI lecture notes 3.) Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Skopeteas, Stavros, and Verhoeven, Elisabeth. 2005. Postverbal argument order in Yucatec Maya. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 58(4). 347-73. DOI: 10.1524/stuf.2005.58.4.347.Google Scholar
Skopeteas, Stavros, and Verhoeven, Elisabeth. 2009. Distinctness effects on VOS order: Evidence from Yucatec Maya. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (New perspectives in Mayan linguistics) 59. 157-74.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer. 1997. Noun faithfulness: On the privileged behavior of nouns in phonology. Amherst: University of Massachusetts MA thesis.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer. 2011. Category-specific effects. The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. 4: Phonological interfaces, ed. by Oostendorp, Marc van, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth, and Rice, Keren, 2439-63. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, Joshua Hinmán. 1975. La familia tzeltalana. Paper presented at the Mayan Workshop, Antigua, Guatemala.Google Scholar
Staub, Adrian, Charles, Clifton Jr. and Frazier, Lyn. 2006. Heavy NP shift is the parser's last resort: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 54(3). 389–406. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.002.10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2004. On the edge. Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects, ed. by Adger, David, De Cat, Cécile, and Tsoulas, George, 226-87. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith. 2004. Grammar meets discourse: The case of Yucatec Maya. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Boston.Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1999. On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30(2). 219-55. DOI: 10.1162/002438999554048.10.1162/002438999554048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2007. The syntax-phonology interface. The Cambridge handbook of phonology, ed. by Lacy, Paul de, 435-56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert, and Féry, Caroline. 2015. Hierarchical organisation and tonal scaling. Phonology 32(1). 19–47. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675715000032.10.1017/S0952675715000032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. Multiple spell-out. Working minimalism, ed. by Epstein, Samuel David and Hornstein, Norbert, 251-82. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Van Everbroeck, Ezra. 2003. Language type frequency and learnability from a connectionist perspective. Linguistic Typology 7. 1–50. DOI: 10.1515/lity.2003.011.10.1515/lity.2003.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vázquez Álvarez, Juan Jesús. 2002. Morfología del verbo de la lengua chol de Tila Chiapas. Mexico City: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social MA thesis.Google Scholar
Vázquez Álvarez, Juan Jesús. 2011. A grammar of Chol, a Mayan language. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin dissertation.Google Scholar
Vázquez Álvarez, Juan Jesús, and Maldonado, Roberto Zavala. 2013. La estructura argumental preferida en el chol, una lengua agentiva. Proceedings of the Conference on Indigenous Languages of Latin America – VI, 1–25.Google Scholar
Wagner, Michael. 2005. Prosody and recursion. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Wagner, Michael. 2010. Prosody and recursion in coordinate structures and beyond. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28(1). 183–237. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-009-9086-0.10.1007/s11049-009-9086-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasow, Thomas. 2002. Postverbal behavior. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Werle, Adam. 2009. Word, phrase, and clitic prosody in Bosnian, Serbian, and Croatian. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Amherst dissertation.Google Scholar
Wolfart, H. Christoph. 1973. Plains Cree: A grammatical study. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 63(5). 1–90. DOI: 10.2307/1006246.10.2307/1006246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zavala, Roberto. 1992. El Kanjobal de San Miguel Acatán. México City: UNAM.Google Scholar
Zavala, Roberto. 2000. Multiple classifier systems in Akatek (Mayan). Systems of nominal classification, ed. by Senft, Gunter, 114-46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zavala, Roberto. 2007. Inversion and obviation in Mesoamerica. Endangered languages, ed. by Austin, Peter K. and Simpson, Andrew, 267–306. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar