Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-v48vw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-22T01:44:31.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plagiarism and English for academic purposes: A research agenda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2022

Diane Pecorari
Diane Pecorari*
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
*
Email: diane.pecorari@cityu.edu.hk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Plagiarism is a consistent source of concern for educators, and particularly so for English for Academic Purposes (EAP) practitioners, whose objective is to equip students for success across the curriculum. Plagiarism has been on the EAP research agenda for some 35 years and remains a topic of considerable research interest. While perceptions of plagiarism have been extensively investigated, a number of questions relating to the prevalence and causes of plagiarism remain unanswered, and solid evidence about effective pedagogical methods is largely lacking. This article outlines directions for future research on the topic and describes specific investigations that could be conducted.

Information

Type
Thinking Allowed
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , July 2023 , pp. 362 - 376
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abasi, A. R., Akbari, N., & Graves, B. (2006). Discourse appropriation, construction of identities, and the complex issue of plagiarism: ESL students writing in graduate school. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 102–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angélil-Carter, S. (2000). Stolen language? Plagiarism in writing. Longman.Google Scholar
Barks, D., & Watts, P. (2001). Textual borrowing strategies for graduate-level ESL writers. In Belcher, D., & Hirvela, A. (Eds.), Linking literacies: Perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections (pp. 246–267). University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bikowski, D., & Gui, M. (2018). The influence of culture and educational context on Chinese students’ understandings of source use practices and plagiarism. System, 74, 194–205. doi:10.1016/j.system.2018.03.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, E. (2009). Local plagiarisms. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 415–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canzonetta, J. (2019). Can we use plagiarism detection services responsibly? In Pecorari, D., & Shaw, P. (Eds.), Student plagiarism in higher education (pp. 74–88). Routledge.Google Scholar
Curtis, G. J., & Tremayne, K. (2019). Is plagiarism really on the rise? Results from four 5-yearly surveys. Studies in Higher Education, 1–11. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1707792Google Scholar
Curtis, G. J., & Vardanega, L. (2016). Is plagiarism changing over time? A 10-year time-lag study with three points of measurement. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(6), 1167–1179. doi:10.1080/07294360.2016.1161602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. (2012). International postgraduate students’ experiences of plagiarism education in the UK: Student, tutor and expert perspectives. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 8(2), 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M., & Morley, J. (2015). Phrasal intertextuality: The responses of academics from different disciplines to students’ re-use of phrases. Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, 20–35. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2015.02.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deckert, G. D. (1993). Perspectives on plagiarism from ESL students in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2(2), 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dionne, E. J. (1987, 24 September). Biden withdraws bid for president in wake of furor. New York Times, A1.Google Scholar
Eaton, S. E. (2017). Comparative analysis of institutional policy definitions of plagiarism: A Pan-Canadian University study. Interchange, 48(3), 271–281. doi:10.1007/s10780-017-9300-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, S. E. (2021). Plagiarism in higher education: Tackling tough topics in academic integrity. ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
Farrimond, H. (2013). Doing ethical research. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J., & Li, Y. (2007). Language re-use among Chinese apprentice scientists writing for publication. Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 440–465. doi:10.1093/applin/amm031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, J., Strickland, D., Timmerman, B., Maher, M., & Feldon, D. (2010). Weeds in the flower garden: An exploration of plagiarism in graduate students’ research proposals and its connection to enculturation, ESL, and contextual factors. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 6(1), 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gyllstad, H., & Schmitt, N. (2018). Testing formulaic language. In A. Siyanova-Chanturia & A. Pellicer-Sanchez (Eds.), Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective (pp. 174–191). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ha, P. L. (2006). Plagiarism and overseas students: Stereotypes again? ELT Journal, 60, 76–78. doi:10.1093/elt/cci085Google Scholar
Howard, R. (1999). Standing in the shadow of giants. Ablex.Google Scholar
Howard, R. M. (1995). Plagiarisms, authorships, and the academic death penalty. College English, 57(7), 788–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, R. M. (2000). Sexuality, textuality: The cultural work of plagiarism. College English, 62(4), 473–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, R. M., Serviss, T., & Rodrigue, T. K. (2010). Writing from sources, writing from sentences. Writing and Pedagogy, 2(2), 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, G., & Rose, M. (1989). Rethinking remediation: Toward a social-cognitive understanding of problematic reading and writing. Written Communication, 6(2), 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, S. (2019). Shouldn't our expectations of students’ and academics’ intertextuality practices differ? In Pecorari, D., & Shaw, P. (Eds.), Student plagiarism in higher education (pp. 105–122). Routledge.Google Scholar
Jamieson, S., & Howard, R. M. (2013). Sentence-Mining: Uncovering the amount or reading and reading comprehension in college writers’ researched writing. In McClure, R., Purdy, J. P., & McClure, R. (Eds.), The new digital scholar: Exploring and enriching the research and writing practices of NextGen students (pp. 111–133). American Society for Information Science and Technology by Information Today, Inc.Google Scholar
Kaposi, D., & Dell, P. (2012). Discourses of plagiarism: Moralist, proceduralist, developmental and inter-textual approaches. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 33(6), 813–830. doi:10.1080/01425692.2012.686897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, C. (2006). The use of paraphrase in summary writing: A comparison of L1 and L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(4), 261–278. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, C. (2014). Copying, paraphrasing, and academic writing development: A re-examination of L1 and L2 summarization practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 25, 4–22. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2014.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, M. L. (1991). The student papers of Martin Luther King, Jr.: A summary statement on research. The Journal of American History, 78(1), 23. doi:10.2307/2078081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1999). A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16(1), 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., & Flowerdew, J. (2019). What really is the relationship between plagiarism and culture? Some thoughts from the Chinese context. In Pecorari, D., & Shaw, P. (Eds.), Student plagiarism in higher education (pp. 157–167). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Li, Y, & Flowerdew, J. (2007). Shaping Chinese novice scientists’ manuscripts for publication. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(2), 100–117. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luzón, M. J. (2015). An analysis of the citation practices of undergraduate Spanish students. Journal of Academic Writing, 5(1), 52–64. doi:10.18552/joaw.v5i1.158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matalene, C. (1985). Contrastive rhetoric: An American writing teacher in China. College English, 47(8), 789–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKnight, G. D. (1998). The last crusade: Martin Luther King, Jr., the FBI, and the poor people's campaign. Westview Press.Google Scholar
Miller, K. D. (1991). Martin Luther King, Jr., and the black folk pulpit. The Journal of American History, 78(1), 120. doi:10.2307/2078090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Open University (n.d.) Plagiarism policy, https://help.open.ac.uk/documents/policies/plagiarism/files/35/plagiarism.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ouellette, M. A. (2008). Weaving strands of writer identity: Self as author and the NNES “plagiarist”. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(4), 255–273. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pecorari, D. (2001). Plagiarism and international students: How the English-speaking university responds. In Belcher, D., & Hirvela, A. (Eds.), Linking literacies: Perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections (pp. 229–245). University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 317–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pecorari, D. (2006). Visible and occluded citation features in postgraduate second-language writing. English for Specific Purposes, 25(1), 4–29. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2005.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pecorari, D. (2008). Academic writing and plagiarism: A linguistic analysis. Continuum.Google Scholar
Pecorari, D. (2013). Teaching to avoid plagiarism: How to promote good source use. Open University Press.Google Scholar
Pecorari, D. (2019). Can plagiarism be defined? In Pecorari, D., & Shaw, P. (Eds.), Student plagiarism in higher education (pp. 12–27). Routledge.Google Scholar
Pecorari, D., & Petrić, B. (2014). Plagiarism in second-language writing. Language Teaching, 47(03), 269–302. doi:10.1017/S0261444814000056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pecorari, D., & Shaw, P. (2012). Types of student intertextuality and faculty attitudes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2), 149–164. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pecorari, D., Shaw, P., & Malmström, H. (2019). Developing a new academic vocabulary test. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 39, 59–71. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2019.02.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reagon, B. J. (1991). “Nobody knows the trouble I See”; or, “By and By I'm gonna Lay down My heavy load.”. The Journal of American History, 78(1), 111. doi:10.2307/2078089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R. (1995). Plagiarism and ideology: Identity in intercultural discourse. Language in Society, 24(1), 1–28. doi:10.1017/S0047404500018388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson-Vlach, R., & Ellis, N. C. (2010). An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 487–512. doi:10.1093/applin/amp058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solin, A. (2002). Recycling language: Plagiarism or routine intertextuality. In Raumolin-Brunberg, H., Nevola, M., Nurmi, A., & Rissanen, M. (Eds.), Variation past and present: VARIENG studies in English for terttu nevalainen (pp. 355–372). Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Sutherland-Smith, W. (2008). Plagiarism, the internet and student learning: Improving academic integrity. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufescu, F. (2008). Oscar wilde's plagiarism: The triumph of art over ego. Irish Academic Press.Google Scholar
University of Sydney (n.d.). Academic dishonesty and plagiarism. https://www.sydney.edu.au/students/academic-dishonesty.htmlGoogle Scholar
Villalva, K. E. (2006). Hidden literacies and inquiry approaches of bilingual high school writers. Written Communication, 23(1), 91–129. doi:10.1177/0741088305283929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber-Wulff, D. (2019a). Why does plagiarism detection software not find all plagiarism? In Pecorari, D., & Shaw, P. (Eds.), Student plagiarism in higher education (pp. 62–73). Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber-Wulff, D. (2019b). Plagiarism detectors are a crutch, and a problem. Nature, 567(7749), 435–435. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-00893-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheeler, G. (2009). Plagiarism in the Japanese universities: Truly a cultural matter? Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 17–29. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.09.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiemeyer, L. (2020). Intertextuality in foreign-language academic writing in English: A mixed-methods study of university students’ writing products and processes in source-based disciplinary assignments [Doctoral dissertation (monograph)]. University of Bremen.Google Scholar