Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-bvgqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T16:32:12.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards the corpus revolution? Bridging the research–practice gap

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2019

Angela Chambers
Angela Chambers*
Affiliation:
University of Limerick, Ireland
*
Email: Angela.Chambers@ul.ie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although there is a large and increasing body of research on the use of corpus data by language teachers and learners, the language teachers in question are also the researchers reporting on their use of corpora with their own learners. There is thus a gap, which this plenary speech addresses, between this research and the practice of language teachers who are not corpus linguists. After a brief account of the successful integration of corpus data in the production of language learning resources such as dictionaries, grammars and course books, the potential benefits of having direct access to corpora by teachers and learners are discussed. Following this, a number of publications on the use of corpora in the language classroom, both in higher education and at secondary level, are examined, focussing on how easy or difficult it would be for teachers to replicate the use of corpus data in their own classrooms. This leads to a final section where possible solutions to the research–practice gap are considered, involving language teacher education, publishers of course books, and research involving the use of corpora in the classroom by language teachers who are not also corpus linguists.

Information

Type
Plenary Speeches
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , October 2019 , pp. 460 - 475
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This plenary lecture was delivered at the 2017 conference of the Asociación Española de Lingüística Aplicada (AESLA), Universidad de Jaén, Spain.

References

Aljohani, W. (2017). Corpus Linguistics in language teacher education: Current status and future prospects in Saudi Arabia. Ph.D. thesis, University of Limerick, Ireland.Google Scholar
Amador Moreno, C. P., O'Riordan, S., & Chambers, A. (2006). Integrating a corpus of classroom discourse in language teacher education: The case of discourse markers. ReCALL, 18(1), 83–84.Google Scholar
Anthony, L. (2011). AntConc (Version 3.2.4w). [Computer Software] Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University, available: http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/Google Scholar
Anthony, L. (2016). Introducing corpora and corpus tools into the technical writing classroom through Data-Driven Learning (DDL). In Flowerdew, J. & Costley, T. (Eds.), Discipline specific writing (pp. 162–180). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aston, G. (2015). Learning phraseology from speech corpora. In Lenko-Szymanska, A. & Boulton, A. (Eds.), Multiple affordances of language corpora for Data-Driven Learning (pp. 63–84). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Baker, P., & McEnery, T. (Eds.). (2015). Corpora and discourse studies: Integrating discourse and corpora. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Baroni, M., & Bernardini, S. (2004). BootCaT: Bootstrapping corpora and terms from the web. In Lino, M. T., Xavier, M. F., Ferreira, F., Costa, R., Silva, R., with the collaboration of Pereira, C., Carvalho, F., Lopes, M., Catarino, M., & Barros, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2004 (pp. 1313–1316). Lisbon: ELDA.Google Scholar
Bax, S. (2003). CALL – past, present and future. System, 3(1), 13–28.Google Scholar
Bax, S. (2011). Normalisation revisited: The effective use of technology in language education. International Journal of Computer-assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 1–15.Google Scholar
Bernardini, S. (2000). Systematising serendipity: Proposals for concordancing large corpora with language learners. In Burnard, L. & McEnery, T. (Eds.), Rethinking language pedagogy from a corpus perspective (pp. 225–234). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Boulton, A. (2010). Learning outcomes from corpus consultation. In Jaén, M. M., Valverde, F. S., & Pérez, M. C. (Eds.), Exploring new paths in language pedagogy: Lexis and corpus-based language teaching (pp. 129–144). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Boulton, A. (2017). Corpora in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 50(4), 483–506.Google Scholar
Boulton, A., & Cobb, T. (2017). Corpus use in language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 67(2), 348–393.Google Scholar
Braun, S. (2005). From pedagogically relevant corpora to authentic language learning contents. ReCALL, 17(1), 47–64.Google Scholar
Braun, S. (2007). Integrating corpus work into secondary education: From data-driven learning to needs-driven corpora. ReCALL, 19(3), 307–328.Google Scholar
Breyer, Y. (2009). Learning and teaching with corpora: Reflections by student teachers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(2), 153–172.Google Scholar
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, A. (2015). The learner corpus as a pedagogic corpus. In Granger, S., Gilquin, G., & Meunier, F. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp. 445–464). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, A., & Le Baron, F. (2007). The Chambers-Le Baron Corpus of Research Articles in French/Le Corpus Chambers-Le Baron d'articles de recherche en français. Oxford: Oxford Text Archive. http://ota.ahds.ac.uk/headers/2527.xmlGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Charles, M. (2014). Getting the corpus habit: EAP students’ long-term use of personal corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 35, 30–40.Google Scholar
Cobb, T. (1997). Is there any measurable learning from hands on concordancing? System, 25(3), 301–315.Google Scholar
Cobb, T., & Boulton, A. (2015). Classroom applications of corpus analysis. In Biber, D. & Reppen, R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics (pp. 478–497). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Conrad, S. (2000). Will corpus linguistics revolutionize grammar teaching in the 21st century? TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 548–560.Google Scholar
Farr, F. (2008). Evaluating the use of corpus-based instruction in a language teacher education context: Perspectives from the users. Language Awareness, 17(1), 25–43.Google Scholar
Farr, F. (2010). How can corpora be used in teacher education? In O'Keeffe, A. & McCarthy, M. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 620–632). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, L. (2015). Data driven learning and language learning theories: Whither the twain shall meet. In Lenko-Szymanska, A. & Boulton, A. (Eds.), Multiple affordances of language corpora for data-driven learning (pp. 15–36). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Frankenberg-Garcia, A. (2014). The use of corpus examples for language comprehension and production. ReCALL, 26(2), 128–146.Google Scholar
Frankenberg-Garcia, A. (2015). Training translators to use corpora hands-on: Challenges and reactions by a group of 13 students at a UK university. Corpora, 10(3), 351–380.Google Scholar
Gabrielatos, C. (2005). Corpora and language teaching: Just a fling, or wedding bells? TESL-EJ, 8(4), 1–37.Google Scholar
Granger, S. (2015). The contribution of learner corpora to reference and instructional materials design. In Granger, S., Gilquin, G., & Meunier, F. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp. 486–510). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johns, T. (1986). Micro-concord: A language learner's research tool. System, 14(2), 151–162.Google Scholar
Johns, T. (1991). Should you be persuaded: Two samples of data-driven learning materials. English Language Research Journal, 4, 1–16. Retrieved from http://wordsmithtools.net/wordsmith/corpus_linguistics_links/Tim%20Johns%20and%20DDL.pdfGoogle Scholar
Johns, T. (1997). Contexts: The background, development and trialling of a concordance based CALL program. In Wichmann, A., Fligelstone, S., McEnery, T., & Knowles, G. (Eds.), Teaching and language corpora (pp. 100–115). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C., & Miceli, T. (2017). Cultivating effective corpus use by language learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1–2), 91–114.Google Scholar
Lee, D., & Swales, J. (2006). A corpus-based EAP course for NNS doctoral students: Moving from available specialized corpora to self-compiled corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 25(1), 56–75.Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1997). Teaching and language corpora: A convergence. In Wichmann, A., Fligelstone, S., McEnery, T., & Knowles, G. (Eds.), Teaching and language corpora (pp. 1–23). London: Longman.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M., McCarten, J., & Sandiford, H. (2004–2006). Touchstone (four levels). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meunier, F., & Gouverneur, C. (2009). New types of corpora for new educational challenges: Collecting, annotating and exploiting a corpus of textbook material. In Aijmer, K. (Ed.), Corpora and language teaching (pp. 179–201). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
O'Keeffe, A., McCarthy, M. J., & Carter, R. (2007). From corpus to classroom: Language use and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Renouf, A., Kehoe, A., & Banerjee, J. (2007). WebCorp: An integrated system for web text search. In Nesselhauf, C., Hundt, M., & Biewer, C. (Eds.), Corpus linguistics and the web (pp. 47–68). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Römer, U. (2006). Pedagogical applications of corpora: Some reflections on the current scope and a wish list for future developments. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 54(2), 121–134.Google Scholar
Rundell, M., & Stock, P. (1992). The corpus revolution. English Today, 8(3), 21–32.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.Google Scholar
Scott, M. (2008). WordSmith Tools version 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Sealey, A., & Thompson, P. (2007). Corpus, concordance, classification: Young learners in the L1 classroom. Language Awareness, 16(3), 208–223.Google Scholar
Tribble, C. (1990). Concordancing in an EAP writing program. CAELL Journal, 1(2), 10–15.Google Scholar
Tribble, C., & Jones, G. (1990). Concordances in the classroom: A resource book for teachers. London: Longman.Google Scholar