Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T05:15:33.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some thoughts on English for Research Publication Purposes (ERPP) and related issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2013

John Flowerdew
John Flowerdew*
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kongenjohnf@cityu.edu.hk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Academic writing for research publication takes place around the globe, involving, according to a recent account, 5.5 million scholars, 2,000 publishers and 17,500 research/higher education institutions (Lillis & Curry 2010: 1). Because so many scholars whose first language is not English are now using English for publication purposes and because of the research interest that has developed in the field, a specialist term has been coined, English for Research Publication Purposes (ERPP). This paper presents an overview of some issues relating to ERPP.

Type
Plenary Speeches
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , April 2015 , pp. 250 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ammon, U. (2007). Global scientific communication: Open questions and policy suggestions. In Ammon, U. & Carli, A. (eds.), Linguistic inequality in scientific communication today. AILA Review 20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 123–133.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. (2001). Individual freedom in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cargill, M. & Burgess, S. (2008). Introduction to the special issue: English for Research Publication Purposes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7.2, 75–138.Google Scholar
Davies, A. (1999). Standard English: Discordant voices. World Englishes 18.2, 171–186.Google Scholar
Deterding, D. (2006). The pronunciation of English by speakers from China. English World-Wide 27, 175–198.Google Scholar
Firth, A. (1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality. On ‘lingua franca’ English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 26, 237–259.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J. (2008). Scholarly writers who use English as an additional language: What can Goffman's ‘Stigma’ tell us? Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7, 77–86.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J. & Dudley-Evans, T. (2002). Genre analysis of editorial letters to international journal contributors. Applied Linguistics 23.4, 463–489.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J. & Li, Y. Y. (2009). English or Chinese? The trade-off between local and international publication among Chinese academics in the humanities and social sciences. Journal of Second Language Writing 18, 1–16.Google Scholar
He, D. & Li, C. S. D. (2009). Language attitudes and linguistic features in the ‘China English’ debate. World Englishes 28.1, 70–89.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2007). Writing in the academy: Reputation, education and knowledge. London: Institute of Education Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2012). Disciplinary identities: Individuality and community in academic discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2011). Accommodating (to) ELF in the international university. Journal of Pragmatics 43, 926–936.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In Quirk, R. & Widdowson, H. G. (eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11–30.Google Scholar
Kingman, J. (1988). Report of the committee of inquiry into the teaching of English language. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Kwan, B. S. C. (2010). An investigation of instruction in research publishing in doctoral programs: The Hong Kong case. Higher Education 59.1, 55–68.Google Scholar
Li, Y. Y. & Flowerdew, J. (2009). International engagement versus local commitment: Hong Kong academics in the humanities and social sciences writing for publication. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8, 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T. M. & Curry, M. J. (2006). Reframing notions of competence in scholarly writing: From individual to networked activity. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 53 (Special Issue: Writing in a global context), 63–78.Google Scholar
Lillis, T. M. & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mauranen, A. & Metsä-Ketelä, M. (eds.) (2006). Introduction. Nordic Journal of English Studies 5.2, Special Issue: English as a Lingua Franca.Google Scholar
Murata, K. & Jenkins, J. (2009). Global Englishes in Asian contexts. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Prodromou, L. (2007). Is ELF a variety of English? A critical discussion of ‘English as a lingua franca’ (ELF) as both a novel phenomenon and in relation to ELT methodology. English Today 23.2, 47–53.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. (1985). The English language in a global context. In Quirk, R. & Widdowson, H. G. (eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–6.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. (1990). Language varieties and standard language. English Today 21, 3–10.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. (2009). Orientations in ELF research: Form and function. In Mauranen, A. & Ranta, E., (eds.), English as a lingua franca: Studies and findings. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 37–59.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. & Feak, C. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (3rd edn). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Parijs, P. (2007). Tackling the Anglophones’ free ride: Fair linguistic cooperation with a global lingua franca. In Carli, A. & Ammon, U. (eds.), Linguistic inequality in scientific communication today. AILA Review 20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 72–86.Google Scholar
Xu, Z. (2008). Analysis of syntactic features of Chinese English. Asian Englishes: An International Journal of the Sociolinguistics of English in Asia/Pacific 11.2, 4–31.Google Scholar