Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-g5lq8 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-11-08T00:10:55.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Because it's easier to kill that way’: Dehumanizing epithets, militarized subjectivity, and American necropolitics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2021

Janet McIntosh Open the ORCID record for Janet McIntosh [Opens in a new window]
Janet McIntosh*
Affiliation:
Brandeis University, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Janet McIntosh, PO Box 549110, MS 006, Brandeis University, Department of Anthropology, Waltham, MA 02454, USA janetmc@brandeis.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the blunt conceptual instrument of dehumanizing American military terms for the enemy in the context of the Vietnam War and the Global War on Terror. I examine language that dehumanizes American service members themselves, who are semiotically framed as expendable. Next, I explore the essentialist, semi-propositional qualities of derogatory epithets for the enemy and the affectively charged, deadly stances they encourage. I examine how generic references to the enemy during training make totalizing claims that risk encompassing civilians in their typifications. And I show that, in the context of war, the instability of derogatory epithets can manifest itself when the servicemember is confronted with the behavioral idiosyncrasies and personal vulnerabilities of actual ‘enemies’ on the ground. The putative folk wisdom found in generic references to the enemy can thus fall apart when confronted with countervailing experience; in such cases, service members may shift stance by renouncing military epithets. (Military language, epithets, slurs, generics, othering, dehumanization, necropolitics)*

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 50 , Special Issue 4: The Generic , September 2021 , pp. 583 - 603
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

This article benefited from exceptional feedback from Chip Zuckerman, as well as invaluable suggestions and thoughts from Susan Gelman, Bruce Mannheim, Jack Sidnell, and two anonymous reviewers. I am also extremely grateful to the veterans who have shared their invaluable thoughts and written work with me.

References

REFERENCES

Agha, Asif (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Alim, H. Samy; Rickford, John R.; & Ball, Arnetha F. (eds.) (2016). Raciolinguistics: How language shapes our ideas about race. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asad, Talal (2007). On suicide bombing. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Michael M. (1983). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bax, Anna (2018). ‘The C-word’ meets ‘the N-word’: The slur-once-removed and the discursive construction of ‘reverse racism’. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 28(2):114–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Claudia (2014). The speech acts account of derogatory epithets: Some critical notes. In Dutant, Julien, Fassio, David, & Meylan, Anne (eds.), Liber Amicorum Pascal Engel, 465–80. Geneva: Université de Genève.Google Scholar
Bloch, Maurice (1992). Prey into hunter: The politics of religious experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buber, Martin (1937). I and thou. Trans. by Smith, Ronald Gregor. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah (1995). Verbal hygiene. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cohn, Carol (1987). Sex and death in the rational world of defense intellectuals. Signs 12(14):687–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croom, Adam M. (2013). Racial epithets, characterizations, and slurs. Analysis and Metaphysics 12:11–24.Google Scholar
Das, Veena (2008). Violence, gender, and subjectivity. Annual Review of Anthropology 37(1):283–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Sean (2014). The wax bullet war: Chronicles of a soldier and artist. Portland, OR: Ooligan Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (2004). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. London: Picador.Google Scholar
Frank, David A.; Slovic;, Paul & Vastfjall, Daniel (2011). ‘Statistics don't bleed’: Rhetorical psychology, presence, and psychic numbing in genocide psychology. Jac 31(3–4):609–24.Google Scholar
French, Shannon, & Jack, Anthony (2015). Dehumanizing the enemy: The intersection of neuroethics and military ethics. In Whetham, David & Strawser, Bradley J. (eds.), Responsibilities to protect: Perspectives in theory and practice, 169–95. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gelman, Susan A. (2010). Generics as a window onto young children's concepts. In Pelletier, Francis Jeffry (ed.), Kinds, things, and stuff: Mass terms and generics, 100–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, Dave (1995). On killing: The psychological cost of learning to kill in war and society. New York: Open Road Media.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Stephanie (2000). The kinder, gentler military: Can America's gender-neutral fighting force still win wars. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Harrison, Simon (1993). The mask of war: Violence, ritual, and the self in Melanesia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Hedger, Joseph A. (2013). Meaning and racial slurs: derogatory epithets and the semantics/pragmatics interface. Language and Communication 33:205–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Jane H. (2008). The everyday language of white racism. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Richard (1989). Acts of war: The behavior of men in battle. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hom, Christopher (2008). The semantics of racial epithets. The Journal of Philosophy 105(8):416–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Hal B. (1999). Reconstructing ethnicity. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 5(2):165–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeish, Kenneth (2013). Making war at Fort Hood. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeish, Kenneth (2019). How to feel about war: On soldier psyches, military biopolitics, and American empire. Biosocieties 14:274–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mbembe, Achille (2003). Necropolitics. Public Culture 15(1):11–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, Janet (2020a). Crybabies and snowflakes. In McIntosh, Janet & Denton, Norma Mendoza (eds.), Language in the Trump era: Scandals and emergencies, 74–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, Janet (2020b). Introduction: The Trump era as a linguistic emergency. In McIntosh, Janet & Mendoza-Denton, Norma (eds.), Language in the Trump era: Scandals and emergencies, 1–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Jinim (2007). Narratives of the Vietnam War by Korean and American writers. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Pieslak, Jonathan (2009). Sound targets: American soldiers and music in the Iraq war. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hillary (1975). The meaning of ‘meaning’. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7:131–93.Google Scholar
Reitman, Janet (2017). How the death of a Muslim recruit revealed a culture of brutality in the Marines. New York Times, July 6, 2017. Online: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/06/magazine/how-the-death-of-a-muslim-recruit-revealed-a-culture-of-brutality-in-the-marines.html.Google Scholar
Sallah, Michael, & Weiss, Mitch (2005). Tiger Force: A true story of men and war. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy, & Bourgois, Philippe (2004). Introduction: Making sense of violence. In Scheper-Hughes, Nancy & Bourgois, Philippe (eds.), Violence in war and peace: An anthology, 1–32. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schutz, Alfred (1970). On phenomenology and social relations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Larry (2007). The few and the proud: Marine Corps drill instructors in their own words. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan (1982). Apparently irrational beliefs. In Lukes, Steven & Hollis, Martin (eds.), Rationality and relativism, 149–80. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Terry, Wallace (1984). Bloods: Black veterans of the Vietnam War: An oral history. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Tirrell, Lynne (2012). Genocidal language games. In Maitra, Ishani & McGowan, Mary Kate (eds.), Speech and harm: Controversies over free speech, 174–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor (1970). The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu ritual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Verrips, Jojada (2004). Dehumanization as a double-edged sword: From boot camp animals to killing machines. In Baumann, Gerd & Gingrich, Andre (eds.), Grammars of identity/alterity: A structural approach, 142–54. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Vognar, Chris (2017). PBS documentary takes a long, deep plunge into the open wound of the Vietnam War. The Dallas Morning News, September 14, 2017. Online: https://www.dallasnews.com/arts-entertainment/architecture/2017/09/14/pbs-documentary-takes-a-long-deep-plunge-into-the-open-wound-of-the-vietnam-war/.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna (1988). The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Matt (2018). I hope the military doesn't change my brother like it did me. Time, March 13, 2018. Online: https://time.com/5193840/military-afghanistan-service-marine-corps/.Google Scholar