Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mnl9s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-29T20:56:09.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Navigating normativities: Gender and sexuality in text and talk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2019

Kira Hall ,
Erez Levon  and
Tommaso M. Milani
Kira Hall*
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder, USA
Erez Levon*
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London, UK
Tommaso M. Milani*
Affiliation:
Göteborgs universitet, Sweden and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
*
Addresses for correspondence: Kira Hall, Department of Linguistics, 295 UCB, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0295, USAkira.hall@colorado.edu
Erez Levon, Department of Linguistics, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UKe.levon@qmul.ac.uk
Tommaso M. Milani, Göteborgs universitet, Renströmsgatan 6, 41255 Göteborg, SwedenTommaso.Milani@gu.se
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This special issue was born out of a conversation initiated at a panel organized by two of us at the ninth biannual meeting of the International Gender and Language Association (IGALA), held at City University of Hong Kong in May 2016. The principal goal of the panel was to stimulate an academic discussion on the role of normativity and antinormativity in language, gender, and sexuality research in response to a series of critical interventions in cultural studies regarding some of the tenets underpinning queer theory (see Wiegman 2012; Penney 2014; Wiegman & Wilson 2015). It was our belief that sociolinguistics—with its focus on situated interpretations of social practice—has much to contribute, both theoretically and empirically, to these debates within cultural studies. This special issue is an initial attempt at articulating what such a contribution would be.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 48 , Special Issue 4: Navigating Normativities: Gender and Sexuality in Text and Talk , September 2019 , pp. 481 - 489
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Abu-Lughod, Lila (1990). The romance of resistance: Tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women. American Ethnologist 17:41–55.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul, & Levon, Erez (2016). ‘That's what I call a man’: Representations of racialised and classed masculinities in the UK print media. Gender and Language 10(1):106–39.Google Scholar
Barrett, Rusty (1999). Indexing polyphonous identity in the speech of African American drag queens. In Bucholtz, Mary, Liang, A. C., & Sutton, Laurel A. (eds.), Reinventing identities: The gendered self in discourse, 313–31. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan (2007). Sociolinguistic scales. Intercultural Pragmatics 4(1):1–19.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan; Westinen, Elina; & Leppänen, Sirpa (2015). Further notes on sociolinguistic scales. Intercultural Pragmatics 12:119–27.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, & Hall, Kira (2004). Theorizing identity in language and sexuality. Language in Society 33(4):469–515.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, & Hall, Kira (2008). All of the above: New coalitions in sociocultural linguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4):401–31.Google Scholar
Carr, E. Summerson, & Lempert, Michael (eds.) (2016). Scale: Discourse and dimensions of social life. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Duggan, Lisa (2015). Queer complacency without empire. Bullybloggers 22 September 2015. Online: https://bullybloggers.wordpress.com/2015/09/22/queer-complacency-without-empire/; accessed 26 March 2019.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, & McConnell-Ginet, Sally (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21:461–88.Google Scholar
Ewald, François (1990). Norms, discipline, and the law. Representations 30:138–61.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1978). The history of sexuality, vol. 1: An introduction. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1986). Of other spaces: Utopias and heterotopias. Trans. by Miskowiec, Jay. Diacritics 16:22–27.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan (1995). Language and the ‘arts of resistance’. Cultural Anthropology 10(3):407–24.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan (2016). Sociolinguistic differentiation. In Coupland, Nikolas (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates, 113–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. (1968). The speech community. In Sills, David L. (ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences, vol. 9, 381–86. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halberstam, Jack (2015). Straight eye for the queer theorist. Bullyblogger 12 September 2015. Online: https://bullybloggers.wordpress.com/2015/09/12/straight-eye-for-the-queer-theorist-a-review-of-queer-theory-without-antinormativity-by-jack-halberstam/; accessed 26 March 2019Google Scholar
Hall, Kira (2003). Exceptional speakers: Contested and problematized gender identities. In Holmes, Janet & Meyerhoff, Miriam (eds.), The handbook of language and gender, 353–80. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hall, Kira (2013). ‘It's a hijra!’: Queer linguistics revisited. Discourse & Society 24(5):634–42.Google Scholar
Hames-García, Michael (2011). Queer theory revisited. In Hames-García, Michael & Martínez, Ernesto Javier (eds.), Gay Latino studies: A critical reader, 19–45. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Jagose, Annamarie (2015). The trouble with antinormativity. differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 26(1):26–47.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Levon, Erez; Milani, Tommaso M.; & Kitis, E. Dimitris (2017). The topography of masculine normativities in South Africa. Critical Discourse Studies 14(5):514–31.Google Scholar
Milani, Tommaso M., & Levon, Erez (2016). Sexing diversity: Linguistic landscapes of homonationalism. Language & Communication 51:69–86.Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko (2018). Language and sexual normativity. In Hall, Kira & Barrett, Rusty (eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212926.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780190212926-e-14.Google Scholar
Penney, James (2014). After queer theory: The limits of sexual politics. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Pérez, Daniel Enrique (2014). Jotería espistemologies: Mapping a research agenda, unearthing a lost heritage, and building ‘Queer Aztlán’. Aztlán 39(1):143–54.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, Muriel (1982). The ethnography of communication: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve K. (1994). Tendencies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wiegman, Robyn (2012). Object lessons. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wiegman, Robyn, & Wilson, Elizabeth A. (2015). Introduction: Antinormativity's queer conventions. differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 26(1):1–25.Google Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn (2012). Is the personal political? chronotopes and changing stances toward Catalan language and identity. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 16(2):210–24.Google Scholar
Yep, Gus (2003). The violence of heteronormativity in communication studies: Notes on injury, healing, and queer world-making. Journal of Homosexuality 45(2–4):11–59.Google Scholar