Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-f9nfp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-24T12:04:28.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparisons between processing linguistic and mathematical negations from the perspective of the practice effect and working memory – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2025

Hikari Kinjo Open the ORCID record for Hikari Kinjo [Opens in a new window]  and
Toshiki Saito
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Erratum
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 17 , 2025 , e51
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

This article was published with a formatting error in Table 2. Each equation in the headings should have appeared on a new line, as shown below.

Table 2. Correlation coefficients between accuracy of the verification judgment types in the two verification tasks and the three working memory tasks aggregated across the 10 practice sessions

* p < .05,

** p < .01,

*** p < .001.

The publisher apologises for this error.

References

Kinjo, H., & Saito, T. (2025). Comparisons between processing linguistic and mathematical negations from the perspective of the practice effect and working memory. Language and Cognition. 17:e47. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2025.19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 2. Correlation coefficients between accuracy of the verification judgment types in the two verification tasks and the three working memory tasks aggregated across the 10 practice sessions