Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-t28k2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-23T23:40:46.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The species richness of termites (Isoptera) under differing levels of forest disturbance in the Mbalmayo Forest Reserve, southern Cameroon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Paul Eggleton ,
D. E. Bignell ,
W. A. Sands ,
B. Waite ,
T. G. Wood  and
J. H. Lawton
Paul Eggleton
Affiliation:
The Biodiversity Division, Entomology Department, The Natural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, UK
D. E. Bignell
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary and Westjield College, University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK
W. A. Sands
Affiliation:
The Biodiversity Division, Entomology Department, The Natural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, UK
B. Waite
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK
T. G. Wood
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK
J. H. Lawton
Affiliation:
NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berks, SL5 7PY, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Five forest plots of differing disturbance levels were sampled qualitatively for termites in the Mbalmayo Forest Reserve, southern Cameroon, using 100 m belt transects. Results showed a large reduction in species richness in two severely disturbed plots compared with a Near Primary plot, but little difference in two less disturbed regenerating plots; there is some evidence for a slight increase in species richness in the regenerating plots. Soil-feeders predominate in the primary and regenerating plots, but are greatly reduced in the severely disturbed plots. Wood-feeders appear to be more resilient to disturbance than soil-feeders, although their species richness is low in the most disturbed plots. The Termitinae are the dominant taxonomic group in the Near Primary plot, the Apicotermitinae in the less disturbed regenerating plots and the Macrotermitinae in the clear felled areas. There appears to be no secondary invasion of plots by savanna-associated species, and the small apparent increase in species richness in the less disturbed regenerating plots appears to be due to the influx of forest species usually associated with natural gaps.

Keywords

artificial gapsCameroondisturbancefunctional groupsnatural gapsspecies richnesstermite assemblagestropical forest

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 85 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

LITERATURE CITED

Abe, T. 1978. The role of termites in the breakdown of dead wood in the forest floor of Pasoh Study Area. Malayan Nature Journal 30:391–404.Google Scholar
Belshaw, R. & Bolton, B. 1993. The effect of forest disturbance on the leaf litter ant fauna in Ghana. Biodiversity and Conservation 2:656–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, N. M. 1977. Oxford expedition to the Edea-Marienberg Forest Reserve, United Republic of Cameroon. Bulletin of Oxford University Explorers' Club, New Series 3:5–15.Google Scholar
Collins, N. M. 1979. A comparison of the soil macrofauna of three lowland forest types in Sarawak. Sarawak Museum Journal 27:267–281.Google Scholar
Collins, N. M. 1980. The effect of logging on termite diversity and decomposition processes in lowland dipterocarp forests. Tropical Ecology and Development 198:113–121.Google Scholar
Constantino, R. 1992. Abundance and diversity of termites (Insecta: Isoptera) in two sites of primary rain forest in Brazilian Amazonia. Biotropica 24:420–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heltshe, J. F. & Forrester, N. E. 1983. Estimating species richness using the jackknife procedure. Biometrics 39:1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holdridge, L. R., Grenke, W. C., Hatheway, W. H., Liang, T. & Tosi, J. A. 1971. Forest environments in tropical life zones. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Holloway, J. D., Kirk-Spriggs, A. H. & Khen, C. V. 1992. The response of some rain forest insect groups to logging and conversion to plantation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, series B 335:425–436.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. A., Lamb, R. W., Sands, W. A., Shittu, R. M., Williams, R. M. C. & Wood, T. G. 1982. A check list of Nigerian termites (Isoptera) with brief notes on their biology and distribution. Nigerian Field 45:50–64.Google Scholar
Kooyman, C. H. R. & Onck, R. F. M. 1987. The interactions between termite activity, agricultural practices and soil characteristics in Kisii district, Kenya. Agricultural University Wageningen Papers 87:1123.Google Scholar
Lawson, G. J., Mason, P. A., Ngeh, P. A., Musoko, M., Eamus, D. & Leakey, R. R. B. 1990. Endomycorrhizal and nutrient cycling in indigenous hardwood plantations in Cameroon – effects of different systems of site preparation. Final Report to UK ODA.Google Scholar
Lee, K. E. & Wood, T. G. 1971. Termites and soil. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Matsumato, O. T. & Abe, T. 1979. The role of termites in an equatorial rainforest ecosystem of West Malaysia. II. Litter consumption on the forest floor. Oecologia 38:261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nummelin, M. & Hanski, I. 1989. Dung beetles of the Kibale forest, Uganda; comparison between virgin and managed forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 5:349–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, N. B. 1990. The estimation of species richness by extrapolation. Ecology 71:1195–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, N. B. 1991. Estimating species richness: the second-order jackknife reconsidered. Ecology 72:1512–1513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peakin, G. J. & Josens, G. 1978. Respiration and energy flow. Pp. 111–163 in Brian, M. V. (ed.). The production ecology of ants and termites. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sands, W. A. 1965. A revision of the termite superfamily Nasutitermitinae (Isoptera, Termitidae) from the Ethiopian region. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Entomology) Supplement 4:1–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, W. A. 1972. The soldierless termites of Africa. Bulletin of the British Museum Natural History (Entomology) Supplement 18:1–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, T. G. 1978. Food and feeding habits of termites. Pp. 55–80 in Brian, M. V. (ed.). Production ecology of ants and termites. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wood, T. G., Johnson, R. A., Bacchus, S., Shittu, M. O. & Anderson, J. M. 1982. Abundance and distribution of termites (Isoptera) in a Riparian forest in the Southern Guinea savanna vegetation zone of Nigeria. Biotropica 14:25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, T. G. & Johnson, R. A. 1986. The biology, physiology and ecology of termites. Pp. 1–68 in Vinson, S. B. (ed.). The economic impact and control of social insects. Praeger Publications, New York.Google Scholar
Wood, T. G. & Pearce, M. J. 1991. Termites in Africa: the environmental impact of control measures and damage to crops, trees, rangeland and rural buildings. Sociobiology 19:221–234.Google Scholar
Wood, T. G. & Sands, W. A. 1978. The role of termites in ecosystems. Pp. 245–292 in Brian, M. V. (ed.). Production ecology of ants and termites. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar