Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-zntvd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-02T14:49:44.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Mail/Telephone Technique for Collecting Primary Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Richard W. Smith ,
Jon M. Conrad  and
David A. Storey
Richard W. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Jon M. Conrad
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University
David A. Storey
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Get access

Abstract

A mail/telephone technique is discussed which achieved a 79 percent response rate at a cost per usable survey which was only about 50 percent above the general average costs for using mailed questionnaires. With proper follow-up techniques this method is capable of yielding even higher response rates at a cost far below personal, face-to-face interviews.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , April 1978 , pp. 51 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Brooks, Ralph M., Ryan, Vernon D., Blake, Brian F., and Gordon, John R. “Increasing Response Rates in Mailed Questionnaires: Comment.” Am. J. Agr. Econ. 57 (1975): 517–19.10.2307/1238417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buse, Rueben C. “Increasing Response Rates in Mailed Questionnaires.” Am. J. Agr. Econ. 55(1973): 503–08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buse, Rueben C. “Increasing Response Rates in Mailed Questionnaires: Reply.” Am. J. Agr. Econ. 57 (1975): 520–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Andrew W. “Interviewers’ Verbal Idiosyncracies as a Source of Bias.” The Public Opinion Quarterly. 24(1970): 416–422.10.1086/267820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gum, Russell L. and Martin, William E. “Problems and Solutions in Estimating the Demand for and Value of Rural Outdoor Recreation.” Am. J. Agr. Econ. 57(1975): 558–566.10.2307/1238873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochstim, J. “Comparison of Three Information Gathering Strategeries in Population Study of Sociomedical Variables.” Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, 122nd Annual Meeting. American Statistical Association, pp. 154–159. Washington, 1962.Google Scholar
Sudman, Seymour. Reducing the Cost of Surveys. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1967.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1975. Washington, 1975.Google Scholar