Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T09:04:51.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the history of palatography in Hungarian phonetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2021

Mária Gósy
Mária Gósy*
Affiliation:
Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics, Budapest gosy.maria@nytud.hu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The beginnings of the field of experimental phonetics can be traced back to the second half of the nineteenth century, when (among others) palatography, initiated by an English dentist, started an important new trend in phonetics. This paper outlines the evolution of this revolutionary experimental technique, discusses its two types, direct (static vs. natural) and indirect palatography, and describes the materials and procedures that researchers used. Hungarian scholars, Balassa, Gombocz, Csűry and Hegedűs, were among the very first who used palatography, ahead of many other European researchers. This paper highlights their methodological achievements and some of their findings obtained in studying the articulation of Hungarian vowels and consonants using palatography.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , December 2023 , pp. 682 - 693
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the International Phonetic Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abercrombie, David. 1957. Direct palatography. Zeitschrift für Phonetik und allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 10, 21–25.Google Scholar
Anderson, Victoria B. 2008. Static palatography for language fieldwork. Language Documentation and Conversation 2(1), 1–27.Google Scholar
Ashby, Michael. 2015. Experimental phonetics at University College London before World War I. First International Workshop on the History of Speech Communication Research (HSCR 2015), Dresden, 4–5 September. ISCA Archive: http://www.isca-speech.org/archive.Google Scholar
Ashby, Michael. 2016. Experimental phonetics in Britain, 1890–1940. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oxford. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d8bbffae-8a4e-478e-ba65-0f5a5bbd66e1.Google Scholar
Balassa, József. 1886. A phonetika elemei különös tekintettel a magyar nyelvre [Element of phonetics focusing on Hungarian]. Budapest: Magyar Tudományos Akadémia.Google Scholar
Balassa, József. 1887. A magyar hangok képzése. Stomatoskopikus vizsgálódások alapján [The articulation of Hungarian speech sounds on the basis of stomatoscopic analysis]. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 21, 130–144.Google Scholar
Balassa, József. 1889. Phonetik der ungarischen Sprache. Internationale Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 4(6), 130–156.Google Scholar
Balassa, József. 1900. Újabb phonetikai irodalom [Newer phonetic literature]. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 30, 121–125.Google Scholar
Balassa, József. 1908. Magyar palatogrammok [Hungarian palatograms]. Magyar Nyelvőr 37, 470–472.Google Scholar
Bolla, Kálmán (ed.). 1982. Fejezetek a magyar leíró hangtanból [A chapter from the Hungarian descriptive phonetics]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Bremer, Otto. 1893. Deutsche Phonetik. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Samuel William. 1900. A contribution to the mechanism of articulate speech. Edinburgh Medical Journal 8, 236–259, 332–353, 426–436.Google Scholar
Chlumský, Joseph. 1914. La photographie des articulations dessinées au palais artificiel. Revue de Phonétique 4, 46–58.Google Scholar
Coles, Oakley (James). 1872. On the production of articulate sound (speech). The British Medical Journal (Feb 17), 181–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Csűry, Bálint. 1936. Szamosháti palatogrammok [Palatograms of Szamoshát]. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 50, 64–70.Google Scholar
Fant, Gunnar. 2000. Half a century in phonetics and speech research. Fonetik 2000: Swedish Phonetics Meeting in Skövde, 24–26 May 2000, 1–9.Google Scholar
Gavarret, Jules. 1877. Acoustique biologique: phénomènes physiques de la phonation et de l’audition. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Gombocz, Zoltán. 1900. A kísérleti phonetika és a nyelvtanítás [Experimental phonetics and language teaching]. Magyar Paedagógia 3, 180–187.Google Scholar
Gombocz, Zoltán. 1908. Magyar palatogrammok [Hungarian palatograms]. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 38, 193–204.Google Scholar
Gósy, Mária. 1981. Unpublished palatograms made by the author using the palatograph at the Linguistics Institute. Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics, Budapest.Google Scholar
Gósy, Mária. 2000. The history of the Hungarian speech research. International Journal of Speech Technology 3–4, 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gósy, Mária. 2011. From stomatoscopy to BEA: The history of Hungarian experimental phonetics. In Wai Sum, Lee & Eric, Zee (eds.), Proceedings of 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII), Hong Kong, City University of Hong Kong, vol. 1, 172–175.Google Scholar
Gósy, Mária & Gábor, Olaszy. 1985. A magyar kísérleti fonetika első évtizedei [The early decades of the Hungarian experimental phonetics]. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 87, 109–121.Google Scholar
Grützner, Paul. 1879. Physiologie der Stimme und Sprache. In Ludimar, Hermann (ed.), Handbuch der Physiologie 1(2), 1–236. Leipzig: F.C.W. Vogel.Google Scholar
Hagelin, Hugo. 1889. Stomatoskopiska undersökningar af franska sprakljud [Stomatoscopic studies of the sounds of French]. Stockholm: P. A. Norstedt and Söner.Google Scholar
Hardcastle, William J., Gibbon, Fiona E. & William, Jones. 1991. Visual display of tongue-palate contact: Electropalatography in the assessment and remediation of speech disorders. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 26(1), 41–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hegedűs, Lajos. 1941–1943. Palatogramm-mérés [Measurements of palatograms]. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 51, 64–73.Google Scholar
Howe, George M. 1903. The artificial palate: One way of making it and of keeping its records. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 5(1), 77–82.Google Scholar
Kingsley, Norman William. 1879. Mechanism of speech. New York: D. Appleton and Company.Google Scholar
Kingsley, Norman William. 1887. Illustrations of the articulations of the tongue. Internationale Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 3, 225–248.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1997. Instrumental techniques for phonetic fieldwork. In Hardcastle, William J. & John, Laver (eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences, 137–166. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 2003. Phonetic data analysis: An introduction to fieldwork and instrumental techniques. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Laziczius, Gyula. 1944. Fonétika [Phonetics]. Budapest: Királyi Magyar Egyetemi Nyomda.Google Scholar
Loakes, Deborah. 2013. From IPA to Praat and beyond. In Keith, Allan (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the history of linguistics, 165–184. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marchal, Alain. 1988. La palatographie (Collection Sons et Paroles). Paris: éditions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Meyer, Ernst A. 1910. Untersuchungen über Lautbildung. In Festschrift für Wilhelm Viëtor: Special issue of Die neueren Sprachen, 166–248. Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar
Moses, Elbert Raymond. 1940. A history of palatography techniques. Ann Arbor, MI: Edwards Brothers.Google Scholar
Rousselot, Pierre-Jean. 1897–1908. Principes de phonétique expérimentale. Paris: Welter.Google Scholar
Sievers, Eduard. 1881. Grundzüge der Phonetik: zur Einführung in das Studium der Lautlehre der indogermanischen Sprachen. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.Google Scholar
Šturm, Pavel. 2019. The birth of an institute: A centennial jubilee of Prague’s Institute of phonetics. Acta Universitatis Carolinae/Philologica 2, 9–26.Google Scholar
Techmer, Friedrich Heinrich Hermann. 1880. Phonetik: Zur vergleichenden Physiologie der Stimme und Sprache. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.Google Scholar
Tillmann, Hans Günter. 1995. Early modern instrumental phonetics. In Koerner, E. F. K. & Asher, R. E. (eds.), Concise history of the language sciences, 401–416. Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar