Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T05:41:47.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differences in airstream and posterior place of articulation among Nǀuu clicks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Amanda L. Miller ,
Johanna Brugman ,
Bonny Sands ,
Levi Namaseb ,
Mats Exter  and
Chris Collins
Amanda L. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Cornell Universityam332@cornell.edu
Johanna Brugman
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Cornell Universityjcb52@cornell.edu
Bonny Sands
Affiliation:
Department of English, Northern Arizona Universitysands@lowell.edu
Levi Namaseb
Affiliation:
Department of Language and Literature Studies, The University of Namibialnamaseb@unam.na
Mats Exter
Affiliation:
Institut für Linguistik, Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Universität zu Kölnmats.exter@uni-koeln.de
Chris Collins
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, New York Universitycc116@nyu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes the consonant inventory of the endangered southern African language Nǀuu. Our novel approach to segment classification accounts for all 73 Nǀuu consonants with just four phonetic dimensions (place, manner, phonation, airstream) and does away with the phonetically empty category click accompaniment. We provide ultrasound data showing that the posterior constrictions in clicks are not produced at the ‘velar’ place of articulation, and that posterior place differs with anterior place. We therefore argue for a terminological shift from velaric to lingual airstream mechanism. Our data also show that the posterior place of articulation is the same in Nǀuu's five lingual ([⊙ ǀ ǃ ǁ ǂ]) and linguo-pulmonic ([]) stops. We argue that the difference between these segment classes is best captured in terms of airstream, not place. Plain clicks use only the lingual airstream, while linguo-pulmonic segments are airstream contours, in which the transition to the pulmonic airstream occurs within the segment rather than at its boundary. Our evidence suggests that the contrast between ‘velar’ and ‘uvular’ clicks proposed for the related language ǃXóõ is likely also one of airstream and that a contrast solely in terms of posterior place would be articulatorily impossible.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , August 2009 , pp. 129 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abercrombie, David. 1967. Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Beach, D. M. 1938. The phonetics of the Hottentot language. Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
Bell, Arthur & Collins, Chris. 2001. ǂHoan and the typology of click accompaniments in Khoisan. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 18, 126–153.Google Scholar
Brugman, Johanna. 2005. Pharyngeal constrictions in the vowels of N|u. Presented at Ultrafest III, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, J. E. & Namaseb, Levi. 2001. Stories and songs across cultures: Perspective from Africa and the Americas. Profession 2001, 24–38.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris & Namaseb, Levi. 2007. I want to speak Nǀuu. Ms., New York University & The University of Namibia.Google Scholar
Crawhall, Nigel. 2003. The rediscovery of Nǀu and the ǂKhomani land claim process, South Africa. In Blythe, Joe & Brown, McKenna (eds.), Maintaining the links: Language identity and the land. (The Seventh FEL Conference, Broome, Western Australia), 13–19. Bristol: Foundation for Endangered Languages.Google Scholar
Crawhall, Nigel. 2004. ǃUi-Taa language shift in Gordonia and Postmasburg Districts, South Africa. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Dart, Sarah. 1998. Comparing French and English coronal consonant articulation. Journal of Phonetics 26, 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doke, C. M. 1923. Notes on a problem in the mechanism of the Zulu clicks. Bantu Studies 2 (1), 43–45.Google Scholar
Doke, C. M. 1936. An outline of ǂKhomani Bushman phonetics. Bantu Studies 10 (4), 433–461.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Jerold A., Padayodi, Cécile M., Hassan, Zeki Majeed & Esling, John H.. 2007. The laryngeal articulator: Source and resonator. In Trouvain & Barry (eds.), 2065–2068.Google Scholar
Elderkin, Edward D. 1989. The significance and origin of the use of pitch in Sandawe. Ph.D. dissertation, University of York.Google Scholar
Esling, John H. 1996. Pharyngeal consonants and the aryepiglottic sphincter. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 26, 65–88.Google Scholar
Esling, John H. 2005. There are no back vowels: The laryngeal articulator model. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 50 (1/2/3/4), 13–44.Google Scholar
Fant, G. (1960). Acoustic theory of speech production. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Finlayson, Rosalie, Jones, J., Podile, K. & Snyman, Jan. (1991). An introduction to Xhosa phonetics. Hout Bay: Marius Lubbe.Google Scholar
Fulop, Sean A., Ladefoged, Peter, Liu, Fang & Vossen, Rainer. 2003. Yeyi clicks: Acoustic description and analysis. Phonetica 60, 231–260.Google Scholar
Gick, Bryan, Bird, Sonya & Wilson, Ian. 2005. Techniques for field application of lingual ultrasound imaging. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 19, 503–514.Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom. 2006. Structural isoglosses between Khoekhoe and Tuu: The Cape as a linguistic area. In Matras, Yaron, McMahon, April & Vincent, Nigel (eds.), Linguistic areas: Convergence and language change (Annual Conference of the North West Centre for Linguistics, November 2002; Manchester, England), 99–134. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom & Vossen, Rainer. 2000. Khoisan. In Heine, Bernd & Nurse, Derek (eds.), African languages: An introduction, 99–122. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haacke, Wilfrid. H. G. 1999. The tonology of Khoekhoe (Nama/Damara) (Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung 16). Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
Hagman, Roy S. 1977. Nama Hottentot grammar. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Harris, Katherine S., Vatikiotis-Bateson, Eric & Alfonso, Peter J.. 1992. Muscle forces in vowel vocal tract formation. In Ohala, John, Nearey, Terrance, Derwing, Bruce, Hodge, Megan & Wiebe, Grace (eds.), Second International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP’92), 879–882. Edmonton: University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Hess, Susan. 1998. Pharyngeal articulations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Honda, Kiyoshi. 1996. The organization of tongue articulation for vowels. Journal of Phonetics 29, 34–52.Google Scholar
IPA (International Phonetic Association). 1999. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kagaya, Ryohei. 1978. Soundspectrographic analysis of Naron clicks: A preliminary report. Annual Bulletin, Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics 12, 113–125.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. 1984. Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language 60 (2), 286–319.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia, Cho, Taehong, Fougeron, Cécile & Hsu, Chai-Shune. 2003. Domain-initial articulatory strengthening in four languages. In Local, John, Ogden, Richard & Temple, Rosalind (eds.), Phonetic interpretation (Papers in Laboratory Phonology 6), 143–161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kilian-Hatz, Christa. 2003. Khwe dictionary (Namibian African Studies 7). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
Köhler, Oswin. 1981. La langue Kxoe. In Manessy, Gabriel (ed.), Les langues dans le monde ancient et moderne, Première Partie, les Langues de l'Afrique Subsaharienne, 485–555. Paris: Centre Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian. 1996. Sounds of the world's languages. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Traill, Anthony. 1984. Linguistic phonetic description of clicks. Language 60, 1–20.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Traill, Anthony. 1994. Clicks and their accompaniments. Journal of Phonetics 22, 33–64.Google Scholar
Li, Min, Kambhamettu, Chandra & Stone, Maureen. 2005. Automatic contour tracking in ultrasound images. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 19 (6/7), 545–554.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian, Ladefoged, Peter & Sands, Bonny. 1999. Clicks in East African languages. In Finlayson, Rosalie (ed.), African mosaic: Festschrift for J. A. Louw, 59–91. Pretoria: University of South Africa.Google Scholar
Miller, Amanda. 2007. Guttural vowels and guttural coarticulation. Journal of Phonetics 35, 56–84.Google Scholar
Miller, Amanda, Brugman, Johanna, Howell, Jonathan & Sands, Bonny. 2006. Tongue dorsum location and tongue root retraction in alveolar and palatal clicks in the endangered language Nǀuu. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120 (5), 3377.Google Scholar
Miller, Amanda, Brugman, Johanna & Sands, Bonny. 2007. Acoustic and auditory analyses of Nǀuu lingual and pulmonic stop bursts. In Trouvain & Barry (eds.), 769–772. http://www.icphs2007.de/conference/Papers/1664/1664.pdf (27 April 2009).Google Scholar
Miller, Amanda, Brugman, Johanna, Sands, Bonny, Exter, Mats, Namaseb, Levi & Collins, Chris. 2007. The sounds of Nǀuu: Place and airstream contrasts. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 16, 101–160. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Miller, Amanda, Namaseb, Levi & Iskarous, Khalil. 2007. Tongue body constriction differences in click types. In Cole, Jennifer & Hualde, José I. (eds.), Laboratory phonology 9 (Phonology and Phonetics), 643–656. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Miller-Ockhuizen, Amanda. 2003. The phonetics and phonology of gutturals: A case study from Ju|’hoansi (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics). New Haven, CT: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miller-Ockhuizen, Amanda & Sands, Bonny. 1999. ǃXung as a linguistic construct. Language and Communication 19 (4), 401–413.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Hiroshi. 1996a. A first report on the click accompaniments of ǀGui. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 26 (1), 41–54.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Hiroshi. 1996b. An outline of ǀGui phonology. African Study Monographs, Suppl. 22 (December 1996), 101–124.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Hiroshi. 2006. Aspects of the phonetic and phonological structure of the Gǀui language. Ph.D. dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
Namaseb, Levi. 2006. Language, environment and community in storytelling of Khoekhoe, ≠Khomani, English and Afrikaans in Southern Africa. Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate Department of the Centre for Comparative Literature, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Namaseb, Levi, Sands, Bonny, Miller, Amanda & Brugman, Johanna 2005. Let's learn to write Nǀuǃ / Laat ons Nǀu leer skryfǃ / ǀiisi ǀǀxaǀǀxa Nǀu i kaqleke [Electronic primer]. Upington, South Africa.Google Scholar
Roux, Justus C. & Dogil, Grzegorz. 1998. On the phonetic representation of clicks: Some experimental phonetic considerations. In Caron, B. (ed.), 16th International Congress of Linguists, 20–25 July 1997, Paper 183. Paris: CNRS. CD-ROM format.Google Scholar
Sands, Bonny. 1991. Evidence for click features: Acoustic characteristics of Xhosa clicks. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 80, 6–37.Google Scholar
Sands, Bonny, Brugman, Johanna, Exter, Mats, Namaseb, Levi & Miller, Amanda. 2007. Articulatory characteristics of anterior click closures in Nǀuu. In Trouvain & Barry (eds.), 401–404. http://www.icphs2007.de/conference/Papers/1540/1540.pdf (27 April 2009).Google Scholar
Sands, Bonny, Maddieson, Ian & Ladefoged, Peter. 1996. The phonetic structures of Hadza. Studies in African Linguistics 25 (2), 171–204.Google Scholar
Sands, Bonny, Miller, Amanda & Brugman, Johanna. 2007. The lexicon in language attrition: The case of Nǀuu. In Payne, Doris L. & Peña, Jaime (eds.), 37th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, 55–65. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. http://www.lingref.com/cpp/acal/37/index.html (27 April 2009).Google Scholar
Sands, Bonny, Miller, Amanda, Brugman, Johanna, Namaseb, Levi, Collins, Chris & Exter, Mats. 2006.1400 item Nǀuu dictionary. Ms., Northern Arizona University & Cornell University.Google Scholar
Snyman, Jan. 1970. An introduction to the ǃXũ language. Cape Town: Balkema.Google Scholar
Snyman, Jan. 1975. Žũǀ'hõasi fonologie en woordeboek (Communication of the University of Cape Town School of African Studies 37). Cape Town: Balkema.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. 1999. Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Maureen. 2005. A guide to analyzing tongue motion from ultrasound images. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 19 (6/7), 455–502.Google Scholar
Thomas-Vilakati, Kim. 1999. Coproduction and coarticulation in isiZulu clicks. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Traill, Anthony. 1985. Phonetic and phonological studies of ǃXóõ Bushman (Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung 1). Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Traill, Anthony. 1986. The laryngeal sphincter as a phonatory mechanism in ǃXóõ Bushman. In Singer, Ronald & Lundy, John K. (eds.), Variation, culture and evolution in African populations: Papers in honour of Dr. Hertha de Villiers, 123–131. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
Traill, Anthony. 1994. A ǃXóõ dictionary (Quellen zur Khoisan Forschung 9). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
Traill, Anthony. 1999. Extinct: South African Khoisan languages [CD]. Johannesburg: Department of Linguistics, University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
Traill, Anthony & Vossen, Rainer. 1997. Sound change in the Khoisan languages: New data on click loss and click replacement. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 18, 21–56.Google Scholar
Trouvain, Jürgen & Barry, William J. (eds.) 2007. 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany, 4–10 August 2007. Saarbrücken: Universität des Saarlandes.Google Scholar
Vossen, Rainer. 1997. Die Khoe-Sprachen: Ein Beitrag zur Erforschung der Sprachgeschichte Afrikas (Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung 12). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
Westphal, E. O. J. 1953–1957. Ngǀhuki. BC 1143 (C12), E.O.J. Westphal Papers. Unpublished notes housed at the Rare Documents and Manuscripts Department, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Alva. 2000. La lengua siona. In Pérez, Marıa Stella González de & Montes, Marıa Luisa Rodrıguez de (eds.), Lenguas indígenas de Colombia: Una visión descriptive, 81–198. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Alva & Wheeler, Margaret A.. 1962. Siona phonemics (Western Tucanoan). In Elson, Benjamin F. (ed.), Studies in Ecuadorian Indian languages, 96–111. Norman, OK: Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Wright, Richard, Maddieson, Ian, Ladefoged, Peter & Sands, Bonny. 1995. A phonetic study of Sandawe clicks. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 91, 1–24.Google Scholar
Zemlin, Willard. 1968. Speech and hearing science: Anatomy and physiology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Miller et al. sound files

Sound files zip. These audio files are licensed to the IPA by their authors and accompany the phonetic descriptions published in the Journal of the International Phonetic Association. The audio files may be downloaded for personal use but may not be incorporated in another product without the permission of Cambridge University Press

Download Miller et al. sound files(File)
File 4.6 MB