Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wjfd9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T06:51:39.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE SHIBATA–OKISHIO CONNECTION: LABOR THEORY OF VALUE AND RATE OF PROFIT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2009

DONG-MIN RIEU
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 325 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Akama, M. 2000. “Marxian Economics.” In Ikeo, A., ed., Japanese Economics and Economists Since 1945. London: Routlege.Google Scholar
Fine, B. and Saad-Filho, A.. 2004. Marx's Capital, 4th edition. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Glick, M. and Ehrbar, H.. 1987. “The Transformation Problem: An Obituary.” Australian Economic Papers, 26 (49): 294–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groll, S. and Orzech, Z. B.. 1989. “From Marx to the Okishio Theorem: A Genealogy.” History of Political Economy, 21 (2): 253–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, M. C. and King, J.. 1992. A History of Marxian Economics, vol. 2. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikeo, A. 1994. “When Economics Harmonized Mathematics in Japan: A History of Stability Analysis.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 1 (3): 577–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Soohaeng. 2004. On the Introduction and Development of Marxian Economics in South Korea (In Korean). Seoul: Seoul National University Press.Google Scholar
Krüger, M. and Flaschel, P.. eds., 1993. Nobuo Okishio—Essays on Political Economy. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lange, O. 1935. “Marxian Economics and Modern Economic Theory.” Review of Economic Studies. In Horowitz, David, ed., Marx and Modern Economics. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Morishima, M. 1973. Marx's Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morishima, M. 1974. “The Fundamental Marxian Theorem: A Reply to Samuelson.” Journal of Economic Literature, 12 (1): 71–4.Google Scholar
Morishima, M. 1977. Walras’ Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morishima, M. 1994. Shisoutoshiteno Kindai Keizaigaku. (In Japanese: Modern Economics as Thoughts). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Morishima, M. and Catephores, G.. 1978. Value, Exploitation and Growth: Marx in the Light of Modern Economic Theory. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Morris-Suzuki, T. 1989. A History of Japanese Economic Thought. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nakatani, T. and Rieu, D.-M. 2003. “On the ‘New Interpretation’ of Marxian Labor Theory of Value.” Kobe University Economic Review, 49: 51–62.Google Scholar
Nakatani, T. 1990. “Okishio Nobuo Kyouju no Keizaigaku.” (In Japanese: “The Economics of Professor Nobuo Okishio”). Kokumin Keizai Zassi (Journal of National Economics), 162 (3): 115–35.Google Scholar
Negishi, T. 1989. History of Economic Theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Negishi, T. 2004. “Kyoto School of Modern Economic Theory.” Kyoto Economic Review, 73 (2): 1–10.Google Scholar
Okishio, N. 1956. “Kokuminsyotoku to Roudou.” (In Japanese: “National Income and Labor”). Kokumin Keizai Zassi (Journal of National Economics), 94 (4): 48–64.Google Scholar
Okishio, N. 1961. “Technical Changes and the Rate of Profit.” In Krüger, M. & Flaschel, P., eds., Kobe University Economic Review, 7, 1993.Google Scholar
Okishio, N. 1963. “A Mathematical Note on Marxian Theorems.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 91: 287–99.Google Scholar
Okishio, N. 1972. “Marukusu no Seisankakakuron ni Tsuite.” (In Japanese: “On Marx's Theory of Prices of Production”). Kobedaigaku Keizaigaku Kenkyu (Kobe University Economic Studies), 19: 38–63.Google Scholar
Okishio, N. 1974. “Value and Production Price.” In Krüger, M. & Flaschel, P., eds., Kobe University Economic Review, 20. 1993.Google Scholar
Okishio, N. 1977. Marukusu Keizaigaku. (In Japanese: Marxian Economics), vol. 1. Tokyo: Chikuma Shobo.Google Scholar
Okishio, N. 1995. “An Interview with Professor Okishio.” (In Korean). Iron (Theory), 13: 227–40.Google Scholar
Okishio, N. 2000. “Competition and Production Prices.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 25 (4): 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okishio, N. 2004. Keizaigaku to Gendai no Syomondai. (In Japanese: Economics and Contemporary Problems). Tokyo: Otuki Shoten.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. 1971. “Understanding the Marxian Notion of Exploitation: A Summary of the So-called ‘Transformation Problem’ between Marxian Values and Competitive Prices.” Journal of Economic Literature, 9 (2): 399–431.Google Scholar
Seton, F. 1957. “The Transformation Problem.” Review of Economic Studies, 25:149–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaikh, A. 1977. “Marx's Theory of Value and the Transformation Problem.” In Schwartz, J., ed., The Subtle Anatomy of Capitalism. Santa Monica: Goodyear Publishing.Google Scholar
Shibata, K. 1933a. “Marx's Analysis of Capitalism and the General Equilibrium Theory of the Lausanne School.” Kyoto University Economic Review, VIII: 107–36.Google Scholar
Shibata, K. 1933b. “The Meaning of the Theory of Value in Theoretical Economics.” Kyoto University Economic Review, VIII: 49–68.Google Scholar
Shibata, K. 1934. “On the Law of Decline in the Rate of Profit.” Kyoto University Economic Review, IX: 61–75.Google Scholar
Shibata, K. 1935. Riron Keizaigaku. (In Japanese: Theoretical Economics). Tokyo: Koumondou.Google Scholar
Shibata, K. 1939. “On the General Profit Rate.” Kyoto University Economic Review, XIV: 40–66.Google Scholar
Shibata, K. 1959. Dynamic and Dialectic Theories of World Capitalism. Kyoto: Minerva Shobo.Google Scholar
Sugihara, S., Kumon, S., and Okamura, M. 1996. “Shibata Kei no Nenpo·Tyosaku Mokuroku.” (In Japanese: “Shibata Kei: Career and Works”). Aoyama Kokusai Seikei Ronsyu (Aoyama Journal of International Politics, Economics and Business), 37: 231–64.Google Scholar
Sweezy, Paul. 1942. The Theory of Capitalist Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Takada, Yasuma. 1931. Roudoukachisetsu no Ginmi. (In Japanese: An Examination of the Labor Theory of Value). Tokyo: Nihonhyouron.Google Scholar
Tsuru, S. 1985 [2006]. Gendai Keizaigaku no Gunzou. (In Japanese: Figures in Modern Economics). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Yagi, K. 1999. Kindai Nihon no Syakai Keizaigaku. (In Japanese: Social Economics in Modern Japan). Tokyo: Chikuma Shobo.Google Scholar
Yagi, K. 2006. Syakai Keizaigaku. (In Japanese: Social Economics). Nagoya: Nagoya University Press.Google Scholar