Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-sbgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-22T23:45:02.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Roger E. Backhouse and Mauro Boianovsky, Transforming Modern Macroeconomics: Exploring Disequilibrium Microfoundations, 1956–2003 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 215, $99 (hardcover). ISBN 978-1-107-02319-2.

Review products

Roger E. Backhouse and Mauro Boianovsky, Transforming Modern Macroeconomics: Exploring Disequilibrium Microfoundations, 1956–2003 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 215, $99 (hardcover). ISBN 978-1-107-02319-2.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2016

Pedro Garcia Duarte
Pedro Garcia Duarte*
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 229 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Boumans, Marcel. 2002. “Calibration.” In Snowdon, Brian and Vane, Howard R., eds., An Encyclopedia of Macroeconomics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 105–109.Google Scholar
Boumans, Marcel. 2005. How Economists Model the World into Numbers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Christiano, Lawrence J., Eichenbaum, Martin, and Evans, Charles L.. 2005. “Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy.” Journal of Political Economy 113 (1): 1–45.Google Scholar
Duarte, Pedro Garcia. 2011. “Recent Developments in Macroeconomics: The DSGE Approach to Business Cycles in Perspective.” In Davis, John B. and Wade Hands, D., eds., The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 375–403.Google Scholar
Duarte, Pedro Garcia. 2012. “Not Going Away? Microfoundations in the Making of a New Consensus in Macroeconomics.” In Davis, John B. and Wade Hands, D., eds., The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 190–237.Google Scholar
Duarte, Pedro Garcia, and Lima, Gilberto Tadeu, eds. 2012. Microfoundations Reconsidered—The Relationship of Micro and Macroeconomics in Historical Perspective. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hart, Oliver D. 1982. “A Model of Imperfect Competition with Keynesian Features.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 97 (1): 109–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, Kevin D. 2010. “Idealizing Reduction: The Microfoundations of Macroeconomics.” Erkenntnis 73 (3): 329–347.Google Scholar
King, John. 2012. The Microfoundations Delusion—Metaphor and Dogma in the History of Macroeconomics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kydland, Finn, and Prescott, Edward. 1991. “The Econometrics of the General Equilibrium Approach to Business Cycles.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 93 (2): 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mankiw, N. Gregory. 1989. “Real Business Cycle: A New Keynesian Perspective.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (3): 79–90.Google Scholar
Mankiw, N. Gregory, and Romer, David, eds. 1991. New Keynesian Economics. Two volumes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Mary. 2012. The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sent, Esther-Mirjam. 2002. “How (Not) to Influence People: The Contrary Tale of John F. Muth.” HOPE 34 (2): 291–320.Google Scholar
Sims, Christopher A. 1996. “Macroeconomics and Methodology.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (1): 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smets, Frank, and Wouters, Raf. 2003. “An Estimated Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area.” Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (5): 1123–1175.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy, and Mirowski, Philip. 1994. “The Pure and the Applied: Bourbakism Comes to Mathematical Economics.” Science in Context 7 (2): 245–272.Google Scholar