Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-g8tfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T04:08:28.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Roger E. Backhouse's “How Should We Approach the History of Economic Thought, Fact, Fiction or Moral Tale?” Comment: Thicker is Better

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

E. Roy Weintraub
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Commentary
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , Fall 1992 , pp. 271 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Backhouse, Roger E. 1992. “How Should We Approach the History of Economic Thought, Fact, Fiction, or Moral Tale?” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 14, Spring, 18–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, Donald N. 1988. “Thick and Thin Methodologies in the History of Economic Thought,” in Neil de, Marchi, ed., The Popperian Legacy in Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1984. “The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres,” in Rorty, R., Schneewind, J. B. and Skinner, Q., eds., Philosophy in History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1991. Stabilizing Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1992. “Historical Case Studies Are Made, Not Given,” in Neil de, Marchi, ed., Methodology of Economics, Kluwer, Boston.Google Scholar