Hostname: page-component-7857688df4-mqpdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-16T05:31:49.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Erik Lundberg and Dynamic Economics a Review Article

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Carl G. Uhr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Erik Lundberg, 1907 to 1987, was the last and one of the best of the 1930s vintage of Stockholm School economists. His Studies in the Theory of Economic Expansion, hereafter cited as Studies, represented a significant advance in dynamic theorizing but has scarcely received any attention outside Sweden. The purpose of this essay is acquaint modern economists with Lundbergs achievement.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , Fall 1990 , pp. 222 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Berg, C. 1987. “Utvecklingen av de Svenska Bidragen till Inflationsgapsanalysen,” (“The Development of the Swedish Contributions to the Analysis of Inflationary Gaps”), in Henriksson, R.G., ed., Konjunkturinstitutet under Lundbergs Tid, Kinjunkturinstitutet, Stockholm, 153–70.Google Scholar
Clark, J.M. 1934. Strategic Factors in Business Cycles, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.Google Scholar
Domar, E.V. 1952. “A Theoretical Analysis of Economic Growth,” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 42, 05, 479–95; and in Domar, E.V., Essays in the Theory of Economic Growth, Oxford University Press, London and New York, 1957.Google Scholar
Fellner, W. 1961. Modern Economic Analysis, McGraw-Hill Co., New York.Google Scholar
Haberler, G. 1941. Prosperity and Depression, League of Nations, Geneva.Google Scholar
Hansen, Bent. 1951. A Study in the Theory of Inflation, G. Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Hicks, J.R. 1965. Capital and Growth, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Higgins, B. 1959. Economic Development, W.W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. 1940. How To Pay For The War, in the Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. 9, Essays in Persuasion, Macmillan, St. Martin's Press for the Royal Economic Society, London and Basingstoke, 1972, 367–439.Google Scholar
Lundberg, Erik. 1937. Studies in the Theory of Economic Expansion, P.S. King and Sons, London; reprint Kelley and Millman, New York, 1954.Google Scholar
Lundberg, Erik. 1953. Business Cycles and Economic Policy, translation, G. Allen and Unwin, London, 1957.Google Scholar
Matthews, R.C.O. 1959. The Trade Cycle, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
Metzler, L.A. 1941. “The Nature and Stability of Inventory Cycles,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 23, 08, 113–29; and in AEA Readings in Business Cycle Theory, R.D. Irwin, Homewood, Illinois, 1965, 100–129.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P.A. 1939. “Interactions between the Multiplier Analysis and the Principle of Acceleration,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 21, 05, 75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P.A.. 1939. “A Synthesis of the Principle of Acceleration and the Multiplier,” Journal of Political Economy, 47, 12, 786–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P.A.. 1965. Collected Scientific Papers, 2, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Young, Warren. 1989. Harrod and His Trade Cycle Group, Macmillan, Basingstoke.Google Scholar