Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-r5d9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-29T22:53:58.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coordinatisation by binding groups and unidimensionality in simple theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Ziv Shami
Ziv Shami*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Illinoisat Urbana Champaign, USA, E-mail: zsharni@math.uiuc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract.

In a simple theory with elimination of finitary hyperimaginaries if tp(a) is real and analysable over a definable set Q, then there exists a finite sequence (ai \ i ≤ n*) ⊆ dcleq(a) with an* = a such that for every i ≤ n* if pi = tp(ai/{aj |j < i}) then Aut(pi / Q) is type-definable with its action on . A unidimensional simple theory eliminates the quantifier ∃∞ and either interprets (in Ceq) an infinite type-definable group or has the property that ACL(Q) = C for every infinite definable set Q.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 69 , Issue 4 , December 2004 , pp. 1221 - 1242
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[BPW]Buechler, S., Pillay, A., and Wagner, F., Supersimple theories, Journal of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 14 (2001), pp. 109–124.Google Scholar
[HKP]Hart, B., Kim, B., and Pillay, A., Coordinatisation and canonical bases in simple theories, this Journal, vol. 65 (2000), pp. 293–309.Google Scholar
[HS]Hart, B. and Shami, Z., On the type-definability of the binding group in simple theories, this Journal, to appear.Google Scholar
[H]Hrushovski, E., Unidimensional theories are superstable, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 50 (1990), pp. 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[HI]Hrushovski, E., Computing the Galois group of a linear differential equation (Appendix B), Differential galois theory, Banach Center Publications, vol. 58, Institute of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warszawa, 2002, pp. 97–138.Google Scholar
[K1]Kim, B., Forking in simple unstable theories, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 57 (1998), pp. 257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[KP]Kim, B. and Pillay, A., Simple theories, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 88 (1997), pp. 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Ne]Newelski, L., The diameter of a Lascar strong type, preprint.Google Scholar
[SI]Shami, Z., Internality and interpretable automorphism groups in simple theories, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 129 (2004), no. 1–3, pp. 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SW]Shami, Z. and Wagner, F., On the binding group in simple theories, this Journal, vol. 67 (2002), no. 3, pp. 1016–1024.Google Scholar
[Sh-S]Shelah, S., Simple unstable theories, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 19 (1980), pp. 177–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[W]Wagner, Frank O., Simple theories, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[W1]Wagner, Frank O., On almost orthogonality in simple theories, preprint.Google Scholar
[Z]Zilber, B., The structure of models of uncountably categorical theories, Proceedings of the international congress of mathematicians, vol. 1, 2 (Warsaw, 1983), PWN, Warsaw, 1984, pp. 359–368.Google Scholar