We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
KURT GÖDEL RESEARCH CENTER FOR MATHEMATICAL LOGIC INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS, UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA KOLINGASSE 14-16, 1090 VIENNA AUSTRIAINSTITUTE OF DISCRETE MATHEMATICS AND GEOMETRY VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY WIEDNER HAUPTSTRASSE 8–10, 1040 VIENNA AUSTRIADEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS WE16 GHENT UNIVERSITY KRIJGSLAAN 281-S8, B9000 GHENT BELGIUM
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
REFERENCES
[1]
Aguilera, J. P., The Löwenheim-Skolem theorem for Gödel logic. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 174 (2023), Article number 103235.Google Scholar
[2]
Baaz, M. and Preining, N., On the classification of first order Gödel logics. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 170 (2019), pp. 36–57.Google Scholar
[3]
Baaz, M., Preining, N., and Zach, R., First-order Gödel logics. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 147 (2007), pp. 23–47.Google Scholar
[4]
Baaz, M. and Zach, R., Compact propositional Gödel logics, Proceedings of 28th International Symposium on Multiple Valued Logic, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, 1998.Google Scholar
[5]
Bagaria, J. and Magidor, M., Group radicals and strongly compact cardinals. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 366 (2014), pp. 1857–1877.Google Scholar
[6]
Bagaria, J. and Magidor, M., On
${\omega}_1$
-strongly compact cardinals. Topology and its Applications, vol. 79 (2014), pp. 266–278.Google Scholar
[7]
Baldwin, J. and Shelah, S., A Hanf number for saturation and omission. Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 213 (2011), pp. 255–270.Google Scholar
[8]
Cintula, P., Two notions of compactness in Gödel logics. Studia Logica, vol. 81 (2005), pp. 99–123.Google Scholar
[9]
Dummett, M., A propositional logic with denumerable matrix. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 24 (1959), 96–107.Google Scholar
[10]
Gitman, V. and Osinski, J., Upward Löwenheim-Skolem-Tarski numbers for abstract logics, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
[11]
Gödel, K., Zum intuitionistischen Aussagenkalkül, Ergebnisse eines mathematischen Kolloquiums, 1933, pp. 34–38.Google Scholar
[12]
Hájek, P., Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic, Springer, 1998.Google Scholar
[13]
Jech, T. J., Set Theory, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, 2003.Google Scholar
[14]
Keisler, H. J., Logic with the quantifier “there exist uncountably many”. Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 1 (1970), pp. 1–93.Google Scholar
[15]
Magidor, M., How large is the first strongly compact cardinal? Or a study on identity crises. Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 10 (1976), pp. 33–57.Google Scholar
[16]
Pourmahdian, M. and Tavana, N. R., Compactness in first-order Gödel logics. Journal of Logic and Computation, vol. 23 (2012), pp. 473–485.Google Scholar
[17]
Shelah, S., Classification Theory and the Number of Nonisomorphic Models, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978.Google Scholar
[18]
Smoryński, C., Lectures on nonstandard models of arithmetic, Logic Colloquium 82 (Lollu, G., Longo, G., and Marcja, A., editors), 1984, pp. 1–70.Google Scholar