Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T04:43:36.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using Life Histories in Social Policy Research: The Case of Third Sector/Public Sector Boundary Crossing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

DAVID LEWIS
DAVID LEWIS*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics, London email: d.lewis@lse.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The life-history method is a valuable tool for social policy research. Taking an anthropological approach to studying policy, the article analyses the usefulness of the method using data drawn from a set of recently collected life-work histories from the UK. These life-work histories document the experiences of individuals who have crossed over between the public sector and the ‘third sector’ during their careers. The article first briefly reviews the strengths and weaknesses of the life-history method, then goes on to analyse selected issues and themes that emerge from the data at both the contextual and the individual levels. The article concludes that life-history work adds to our knowledge of the relationship between these two sectors, and of the processes through which ideas about ‘sector’ and policy are constructed and enacted.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , October 2008 , pp. 559 - 578
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abrams, P. (1981), ‘On the difficulty of studying the state (1977)’, Journal of Historical Sociology, 1: 1, 58–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, P. (2004), ‘Transcriptions’, in Seale, C. (ed.), Social Research Methods: A Reader, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benmayor, R. and Skotnes, A. (1994), ‘Some reflections on migration and identity’, in Benmayor, R. and Skotnes, A. (eds), International Yearbook of Oral History and Life Stories Volume III: Migration and Identity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bron, A. and West, L. (2000), ‘Time for stories: the emergence of life history methods in the social sciences’, Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 37: 2, 157–69.Google Scholar
Czarniawska, B. (2004), Narratives in Social Science Research, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deakin, N. (2001), In Search of Civil Society, Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhunpath, R. (2000), ‘Life history methodology: “narradigm” regained’, Qualitative Studies in Education, 13: 5, 543–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, J. (2005), Using Narrative in Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzioni, A. (1973), ‘The third sector and domestic missions’, Public Administration Review, July/August: 314–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evers, A. (1995), ‘Part of the welfare mix: the third sector as an intermediate area’, Voluntas, 6: 2, 159–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, K. (2002), Age, Narrative and Migration: The Life Course and Histories of Bengali Elders in London, London: Berg.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1988), Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1979), Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, London: Aldine Books.Google Scholar
Godfrey, B. S. and Richardson, J. C. (2004), ‘Loss, collective memory and transcripted oral histories’, International Journal of Social Science Research Methodology, 7: 2, 143–55.Google Scholar
Goodley, D. (1996), ‘Tales of hidden lives: a critical examination of life history research with people who have learning difficulties’, Disability and Society, 11: 3, 333–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodson, I. (1992), ‘Introduction’, in Goodson, I. (ed.), Studying Teachers’ Lives, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hagemaster, J. N. (1992), ‘Life history: a qualitative method of research’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17: 9, 1122–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatch, M. J. (1997), Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic and Postmodern Perspectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Home Office (2005), Strengthening Partnerships: Next Steps for Compact, A Consultation Document, London: Active Communities Unit, Home Office.Google Scholar
Kendall, J. (2003), The Voluntary Sector, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ladkin, A. (1999), ‘Life and work history analysis: the value of this research method for hospitality and tourism’, Tourism Management, 20: 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (1999), ‘Introduction’, in Lewis, D. (ed.), International Perspectives on Voluntary Action: Rethinking the Third Sector, London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (2005), ‘Disciplined activists, unruly brokers? Exploring the boundaries between non–governmental organisations, donors and state in Bangladesh’, Paper presented at conference on Activism and Civil Society in South Asia, Pauling Human Sciences Centre, University of Oxford, 26–28 June.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (2006), ‘Anthropology and development: knowledge, history, power and practice’. Keynote paper presented at conference on Anthropology in Practice: Theory, Method and Ethnography in Swedish Development Cooperation, Department of Cultural Anthropology and Ethnology, Uppsala University, 30 November–2 December.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (2007), The Management of Non-Governmental Development Organisations, Second edition, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (2008), in press, ‘Crossing the boundaries between “third sector” and state: life-work histories from Philippines, Bangladesh and the UK’, Third World Quarterly, 29: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D., Bebbington, A., Batterbury, S., Shah, A., Olson, E., Siddiqi, M. S. and Duvall, S. (2003), ‘Practice, power and meaning: frameworks for studying organizational culture in multi-agency rural development projects’, Journal of International Development, 15, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, O. (1961), The Children of Sanchez, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Little, A. and Rochester, C. (2003), ‘Crossing the great divide’, Paper presented to the 32nd Annual Conference of the Association for Research on the Nonprofit Sector and Voluntary Action (ARNOVA), Denver, Colorado, 20–22 November.Google Scholar
Long, N. (2001), Development Sociology: Actor Perspectives, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miclat-Teves, A. G. and Lewis, D. (1993), ‘Philippines overview’, in Farrington, J. and Lewis, D. (eds), Nongovernmental Organisations and the State in Asia: Rethinking Roles in Sustainable Agricultural Development, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Middleton, S. (1993), Educating Feminists: Life Histories and Pedagogy, New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Musson, G. (1998), ‘Life histories’, in Symon, G. and Cassell, C. (eds), Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research: A Practical Guide, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Nicholson, N. (1984), ‘A theory of work role transitions’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 2, 172–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, S. (2000), ‘Understanding public–private partnerships in international perspective: globally convergent or nationally divergent phenomena?’, in Osborne, S. (ed.), Public–Private Partnerships: Theory and Practice in International Perspective, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plummer, K. (1983), Documents of Life: An Introduction to the Problems and Literature of a Humanistic Method, Hemel Hempstead: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Raper, A. (1970), Rural Development in Action: The Comprehensive Experiment at Comilla, East Pakistan, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996), ‘The new governance: governing without government’, Political Studies, 44: 652–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, A. (1964), Collected Papers II: Studies in Social Theory, edited by Brodersen, Arvid, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, A. and Gupta, A. (2006), ‘Introduction’, in Sharma, A. and Gupta, A. (eds), The Anthropology of the State: A Reader, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shore, C. and Wright, S. (eds) (1997), Anthropology of Policy: Critical Perspectives on Governance and Power, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thompson, P. R. (1988), The Voice of the Past: Oral History, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, L. C. and Watson-Franke, M.-B. (1985), Interpreting Life Histories: An Anthropological Enquiry, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Won, S-Y. (2007), ‘Institutionalised powerlessness? The reality of women's policy units and their gendered dynamics in Korea’, Journal of Social Policy, 36: 2, 261–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zehle, S. (2003), ‘Notes on the civil society/NGO nexus on the eve of the WSIS’, www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/, accessed 6 March 2007.Google Scholar