Hostname: page-component-669899f699-cf6xr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T10:26:21.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Organisational outputs of administrative reforms: disability in Danish job centres

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2024

Lena Kjeldsen Open the ORCID record for Lena Kjeldsen [Opens in a new window] ,
Finn Amby  and
Torben Esbo Agergaard
Lena Kjeldsen*
Affiliation:
Research Center for Management, Organization and Society, VIA University College, Aarhus, Denmark
Finn Amby
Affiliation:
Research Center for Management, Organization and Society, VIA University College, Aarhus, Denmark
Torben Esbo Agergaard
Affiliation:
Research Center for Management, Organization and Society, VIA University College, Aarhus, Denmark
*
Corresponding author: Lena Kjeldsen; Email: lkje@via.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Employment rates of people with and without disabilities differ substantially in most countries, and policymakers have tried, with mixed effects, to reduce this gap through different policy measures. However, studies show that governance and managerial reforms also affect implementation of policy. In this study, we examine how the Danish large-scale administrative reform of 2007 has affected the role and structure of the approach of the public employment system (PES) to unemployed people with disabilities. Using Pollitt and Bouckeart’s framework on reform effects, we report on a document analysis of policy papers and a 2019 survey of caseworkers and disability keypersons (N = 453). The analysis identifies few and vague objectives on a process and systems level, with the overall goal being more coherent service delivery. Specifically, a new division of tasks between the state and municipal level was established, including the creation of a disability keyperson at the municipal level to inform and guide job centre colleagues in assisting unemployed with disabilities. In practice, most of the keypersons were doing administrative casework and placed in sections focussed on unemployed with a reduced work ability. Hence, we identify a mismatch between objectives and implementation, questioning whether service delivery has become more coherent.

Keywords

administrative reformgovernance reformpublic employment systememploymentdisability
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , First View , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Amby, F. (2015). Målgruppen der forsvandt - handicapområdets position i dansk beskæftigelsespolitik [The target group that disappeared - disability in Danish Employment Policy]. Frydenlund Academic.Google Scholar
Askim, J., Christensen, T., Fimreite, A. L., & Lægreid, P. (2010). How to assess administrative reform? Investigating the adoption and preliminary impacts of the Norwegian welfare administration reform. Public Administration, 88(1), 232–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, J. C. (2004). Systems of social protection in Europe: Two contrasted paths to activation and maybe a third. In Lind, J., Knudsen, H., & Jørgensen, H. (Eds.), Labour and employment regulation in Europe. Peter Lang, (pp. 191–214).Google Scholar
Barr, B., Clayton, S., Whitehead, M., Thielen, K., Burström, B., Nylen, L., & Dahl, E. (2010). To what extent have relaxed eligibility requirements and increased generosity of disability benefits acted as disincentives for employment? A systematic review of evidence from countries with well-developed welfare systems. Journal Epidemiology and Community Health, 64, 1106–1114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batley, R. (2004). The politics of service delivery reform. Development and Change, 35(1), 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeltzig, H., Pilling, D., Timmons, J. C., & Johnson, R. (2010). Disability specialist staff in US one-stop career centers and British jobcentre plus offices: Roles, responsibilities, and evidence of their effectiveness. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 21(2), 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodkin, E. Z. (2013). Street-level organisations and the welfare state. In Brodkin, E. Z., & Marston, G. (Eds.), Work and the welfare state. DJØF Publishing Copenhagen, (pp. 17–36).Google Scholar
Brodkin, E. Z., & Marston, G. (Eds.) (2013). Work and the welfare state. DJØF Publishing Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Changes to Law on Active Employment Policy Act. (2005). Number 523. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2005/523 (accessed December 16, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Considine, M., Lewis, J., & O’Sullivan, S. (2011). Quasi-markets and service delivery flexibility following a decade of employment assistance reform in Australia. Journal of Social Policy, 40(4), 811–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, R. H. (1998). The consequences of welfare reform: how conceptions of social rights are changing. Journal of Social Policy, 27(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission. (2023). Employment and social developments in Europe 2023. Sustainable growth for all: addressing labour shortages and skills gaps in the EU. Annual Review 2023. Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=26989&langId=en (accessed December 16, 2023).Google Scholar
Fereday, J., & MuirCochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henman, P., & Fenger, M. (2006). Administering welfare reform. International transformations in welfare governance. Policy Press.Google Scholar
ILO. (2019). Promoting employment opportunities for people with disabilities. Quota schemes. Volume 1. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---ifp_skills/documents/publication/wcms_735531.pdf (accessed December 16, 2023).Google Scholar
Karagiannaki, E. (2007). Exploring the effects of integrated benefit systems and active labour market policies: evidence from jobcentre plus in the UK. Journal of Social Policy, 36(2), 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, C., & Carmichael, P. (2005). Improving public services: public administration reform in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Policy, 35(1), 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, F. (2013). Active labour-market reform in Denmark: The role of governance in policy change? In Brodkin, E. Z., & Marston, G. (Eds.), Work and the welfare state. DJØF Publishing Copenhagen, (pp. 103–124).Google Scholar
Larsen, M., Jakobsen, V., & Højgaard Mikkelsen, C. (2021). Handicap og beskæftigelse 2020 – Viden til at understøtte, at flere personer med handicap kommer i beskæftigelse [Disability and employment 2020. knowledge to support more people with disabilities in employment] VIVE.Google Scholar
Larsen, M. R., & Larsen, M. (2017). Handicap, beskæftigelse og uddannelse i 2016 [Disability, employment and education in 2016] København: SFI 17:15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legislative proposal L 22. (2005). Lovforslag L 22 om ansvaret for og styringen af den aktive beskæftigelsesindsats, fremsat 24. februar 2005 [Legeslative proposal L22 concerning the responsibility for and steering of the active labour market efforts].Google Scholar
Lopez-Santana, M., & Moyer, R. (2012). Decentralising the active welfare state: the relevance of intergovernmental structures in Italy and Spain. Journal of Social Policy, 41(4), 769–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marselisborg Consulting. (2021). Kortlægning af kommunernes praksis på handicapområdet [Mapping of the praxis of municipalities regarding the disability area], Marselisborg. https://star.dk/media/17780/n-kortlaegning-af-kommunernes-praksis-paa-handicapomraadet-hovedrapport.pdf (accessed December 16, 2023).Google Scholar
McHale, P., Pennington, A., Mustard, C., Mahood, Q., Andersen, I., Jensen, N. K., Burström, B., Thielen, K., Harber-Aschan, L., McAllister, A., Whitehead, M., & Barr, B. (2020). What is the effect of changing eligibility criteria for disability benefits on employment? A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence from OECD countries. PLOS ONE, 15(12), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Finance. (2004). Analyse af ordningen vedr. tilskud til personlig assistance til handicappede i erhverv [Analysis of the Scheme Concerning Grants for Personal Assistance for Employed People with handicap].Google Scholar
Ministry of Higher Education and Science. (2014). The Danish code of conduct for research integrity. Ministry of Higher Education and Science. https://ufm.dk/publikationer/2015/filer/file (accessed December 16, 2023).Google Scholar
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Health. (2004). Aftale om strukturreform [Agreement on the structural reform]. https://sum.dk/Media/7/A/Strukturaftale.pdf (accessed December 16, 2022).Google Scholar
Modini, M., Tan, L., Brinchmann, B., Wang, M. J., Killackey, E., Glozier, N., Mykletun, A., & Harvey, S. B. (2016). Supported employment for people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis of the international evidence. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 209, 14–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
OECD. (2010). Sickness, disability and work: Breaking the barriers: A synthesis of findings across OECD countries. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264088856-en (accessed December 16, 2023).Google Scholar
Pollitt, C. (1995). Justification by works or by faith? Evaluating the new public management. Evaluation, 1(2), 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis – Into the age of austerity. (4th ed.) Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rambøll Management Consulting. (2009a). Evaluering af handicapindsatsen – Barrierenotat [Evaluation of the efforts to assist people with disability – Barrier report]. Rambøll Management Consulting.Google Scholar
Rambøll Management Consulting. (2009b). Evaluering af handicapindsatsen – Løsningsnotat [Evaluation of the efforts to assist people with disability – Solution report]. Rambøll Management Consulting.Google Scholar
Rauch, A., & Dornette, J. (2010). Equal rights and equal duties? Activating labour market policy and the participation of long-term unemployed people with disabilities after the reform of the German welfare state. Journal of Social Policy, 39(1), 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Responsibility for and Management of the Active Employment Policy Act. (2005). Number 522. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2005/522 (accessed December 16, 2022).Google Scholar
Rydland, H. T., Bentsen, H. L., & Ervik, R. (2023). Promoting labour market inclusion of the chronically ill: a scoping review of Scandinavian countries’ efforts. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 51(8), 1097–1107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Agency for Labour Market and Recruitment. (2021). Nøglepersoner på handicapområdet i jobcentrene [Disability keypersons in job centres]. https://star.dk/indsatser-og-ordninger/handicapomraadet/noeglepersoner-i-jobcentrene/ (accessed December 16, 2022).Google Scholar
The Committee of Labour Market. (2009). AMS – Ministerens besøg i Jobcenter Vejle den 17. august 2009. Sagsnummer: 2012-1012561 [TCLM – The Minister’s visit to Job center Vejle 17. August 2009. Case number: 2012-1012561]. Internal document obtained through right of access.Google Scholar
The Structural Commission. (2004a). Strukturkommissionens betænkning. Sammenfatning. Betænkning nr. 1434 [The Structural Commission. Summary. Government Report nr. 1434]. https://im.dk/arbejdsomraader/kommunal-og-regionaloekonomi/kommunale-opgaver-og-struktur/kommunalreformen-i-2007/strukturkommissionen-2002-2004/ (accessed December 16, 2022).Google Scholar
The Structural Commission. (2004b). Strukturkommissionens betænkning. Hovedbetænkningen. Betænkning nr. 1434 [The Structural Commission. Main Document. Government Report nr. 1434]. https://im.dk/arbejdsomraader/kommunal-og-regionaloekonomi/kommunale-opgaver-og-struktur/kommunalreformen-i-2007/strukturkommissionen-2002-2004/ (accessed December 16, 2022).Google Scholar
The Structural Commission. (2004c). Strukturkommissionens betænkning. Bilag baggrundskapitler. Betænkning nr. 1434 [The Structural Commission. Attachments Background. Government Report nr. 1434]. https://im.dk/arbejdsomraader/kommunal-og-regionaloekonomi/kommunale-opgaver-og-struktur/kommunalreformen-i-2007/strukturkommissionen-2002-2004/ (accessed December 16, 2022).Google Scholar
The Structural Commission. (2004d). Strukturkommissionens betænkning. Bilag Sektorkapitler. Betænkning nr. 1434 [The Structural Commission. Attachments sectorial chapters. Government Report nr. 1434]. https://im.dk/arbejdsomraader/kommunal-og-regionaloekonomi/kommunale-opgaver-og-struktur/kommunalreformen-i-2007/strukturkommissionen-2002-2004/ (accessed December 16, 2022).Google Scholar
Thuesen, F., & Shamshiri-Petersen, D. (2020). Netværk med handicap? Om sociale netværk blandt personer med bevægelseshandicap og deres betydning for jobsøgning og beskæftigelse [Networks with disabilities? On social networks amongst people with disability impairments and the importance for job searching and employment]. In Bredgaard, T., Amby, F., Holt, H., & Thuesen, F. (red.), Handicap og beskæftigelse – Fra barrierer til broer. DJØFs Forlag, (pp. 107–132).Google Scholar
Toonen, T. A. J. (2003). Administrative reform: Analytics. In Guy Peters, B., & Pierre, J. (Eds.), Handbook of Public Administration. Sage, (pp. 467–477).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torfing, J. (1999). Welfare with workfare. Recent reforms of the Danish welfare state. Journal of European Social Policy, 9(1), 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Berkel, R., & Borghi, V. (2007). Contextualizing new modes of governance in activation policies. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27(9/10), 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO. (2011). World report on disability. World Health Organization and The World Bank.Google Scholar
Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. (2nd ed.). Sage.Google Scholar