Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T11:51:28.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The clinical efficacy of effective dose

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2014

Syed F. Akber
Syed F. Akber*
Affiliation:
Radiological Physicist, Lorain, Ohio 44063, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentary
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 375 - 377
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.International Commission on Radiological Protection. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 26, Ann ICRP 1 (3). Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
2.Ma, C, Coffey, C W, DeWard, L Aet al. AAPM's TG-61 protocol for kilovoltage X-ray beam dosimetry. Med Phys 2001; 28: 868–893.Google Scholar
3.Ma, C M, Coffey, C W, De Werd, L Aet al. Status of kilovoltage X-ray beam dosimetry in radiotherapy. In: Ma C M, Seuuntjens J P (eds). Proceedings of Kilovoltage X-ray Beam Dosimetry for Radiotherapy and Radiobiology. Madison: MPP, 1999: 27–42.Google Scholar
4.Das, I J, Akber, S F. Ion recombination and polarity effect of ionization chambers in kilovoltage X-ray exposure measurements. Med Phys 1998; 25: 1751–1757.Google Scholar
5.Knight, R T, Nahum, A E. Depth and field size dependence of ratios of mass-energy-absorption coefficient water-to-air for KV X-ray dosimetry. In Proceeding of the IAEA International Symposium on Measurement Assurance in Dosimetry. IAEA: Vienna, 1994: 361–370.Google Scholar
6.Ma, C M, Seuntjens, J P. Correction factors for water-proofing sleeves in kilovoltage X-ray beams. Med Phys 1977; 24: 1507–1513.Google Scholar
7.Akber, S F, Kehwar, T S. Partial volume characteristic of ionization chambers in kilovoltage exposure measurements. J Radiother in Practice 2011; 11: 184–188.Google Scholar
8.Akber, S F. Correlation between radiation tolerance dose of normal human organ with organ weight, blood and water content. Am J Clin Oncol 2000; 23: 104–105.Google Scholar
9.Akber, S F. Tissue weighting factor and its clinical relevance. J Radiother in Practice 2013; 12: 1–4.Google Scholar
10.Akber, S F. The quality factor of X-rays/gamma rays as one is realistic? J Radiother in Practice 2012; 11: 195–197.Google Scholar
11.Hendee, W. Headlines and hype invite second look at dose estimate methodology. RSNA Daily Bull, p. 1 and 4, 1 December 2011.Google Scholar
12.Staubin, M G. Uncertainties in internal dose calculations for radiopharmaceuticals. J Nucl Med 2008; 49: 853–860.Google Scholar
13.Xu, X G, Bednarz, B, Paganetti, H. A review of dosimetry studies on external-beam radiation treatment with respect to second cancer induction. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53: R193–R241.Google Scholar
14.Martin, C J. Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures? Br J Radiol 2007; 80: 639–647.Google Scholar