Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-d5ftd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-29T03:49:30.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individual Irrationality and Public Policy: In Search of Merit/Demerit Policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Cliff Walsh
Cliff Walsh
Affiliation:
Economist, Australian National University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the context of a re-examination of the conceptual and political foundations of merit/demerit goods, this paper attempts to identify how far they might take us in understanding, explaining, and providing normative justification for, public sector intervention. If merit/demerit influences are to be discovered in actual policies they must be capable of being isolated, at least at the margin, from other policy influences, such as conventional sources of market failure, pure paternalism, and pressure group activities.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , April 1987 , pp. 103 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Kenneth, Arrow (1962), ‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention’, in N.B.E.R., The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton University Press, pp. 609–25.Google Scholar
Kenneth, Arrow (1963), ‘Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care’, American Economic Review, Vol. 53, No. 5 (12), pp. 941–73.Google Scholar
Tony, Atkinson (1983), ‘Smoking and the Economics of Government Intervention’, in Atkinson, A. B., Social Justice and Public Policy, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 371–82.Google Scholar
Auld, D. A. L. and Bing, P. C. (1971), ‘Merit Wants: A Further Analysis’, Finanzarchiv, 30, 2, pp. 257–65.Google Scholar
Kaushik, Basu (1975/1976), ‘Retrospective Choice and Merit Goods’, Finanzarchiv, 34, 2, pp. 220–25.Google Scholar
Geoffrey, Brennan (1975), ‘Pareto Optimal Redistribution: A Perspective’, Finanzarchiv, 33, 2, pp. 237–7.Google Scholar
Geoffrey, Brennan (1986), ‘Irrational Action, Individual Sovereignty and Political Process: Why There is a Coherent Merit Goods Argument’, mimeo (paper presented to ISPE Conference,Australian National University, December 1986).Google Scholar
Geoffrey, Brennan and Lomasky, Loren(1983), ‘Institutional Aspects of “Merit Goods” Analysis’, Finanzarchiv, 41, 2, pp.183–206.Google Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey and Walsh, Cliff (1977), ‘Pareto Desirable Redistribution-in-Kind: An Impossibility Theorem’, American Economic Review, Vol. 67, No. 4 (12), pp. 987–90.Google Scholar
Geoffrey, Brennan and Walsh, Cliff (1981), ‘A Monopoly Model of Public Goods Provision: The Uniform Pricing Case’, American Economic Review, Vol. 71, No. 1 (06), pp. 196–206.Google Scholar
Michael, Burns and Walsh, Cliff (1981), ‘Market Provision of Price-Excludable Public Goods: A General Analysis’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 89, No. 1 (02), pp. 166–91.Google Scholar
Susan, Charles and Westaway, Tony (1981), ‘Ignorance and Merit Wants’, Finanzarchiv, 39, 1, pp. 74–8.Google Scholar
Culyer, A.. (1971), ‘Merit Goods and the Welfare Economics of Coercion’, Public Finance, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 546–72.Google Scholar
Anthony, Downs (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Jon, Elster (1979), Ulysses and the Sirens, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hamlin, Alan P. (1986), ‘The Normative Status of Consumer Sovereignty’ mimeo (paper presented to ISPE Conference, Australian National University, December 1986).Google Scholar
Head, John G. (1966), ‘On Merit Goods’, Finanzarchiv, 25, 1, pp. 1–29Google Scholar
(reprinted in Head, J. G., Public Goods and Public Welfare, Duke University Press, pp. 214–47).Google Scholar
Head, John G. (1969), ‘Merit Goods Revisited’, Finanzarchiv, 28, 2, pp. 214–25Google Scholar
(reprinted in Head, J. G., Public Goods and Public Welfare, Duke University Press, pp. 248–61).Google Scholar
McLure, Charles E. Jr (1968), ‘Merit Wants: A Normatively Empty Box’, Finanzarchiv, 27, 3, pp. 474–83.Google Scholar
Mueller, Dennis C. (1979), Public Choice, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A. (1959), The Theory of Public Finance, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A. (1969a), ‘Provision for Social Goods’, in Margolis, J. and Guitton, H., Public Economics, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A. (1969b), Fiscal Systems, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A. (1971), ‘Provision for Social Goods in the Market System’, Public Finance, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 304–20.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A. (1983), ‘Public Finance, Now and Then’, Finanzarchiv, 41, 1, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A. (1988), ‘Merit Goods’, forthcoming in The New Palgrave DictionaryGoogle Scholar
Oakland, William. H. (1974), ‘Public Goods, Perfect Competition and Underproduction’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 82, pp. 339–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (1985), The Role of the Public Sector, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Edgar, Olsen (1967), ‘A Normative Theory of Transfers’, Public Choice.Google Scholar
Pauly, Mark V. (1970), ‘Efficiency in the Provision of Consumption Subsidies’, Kyklos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauly, Mark V. (1986), ‘Taxation, Health Insurance and the Economics of Medical Care’, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 24, No. 2 (06).Google Scholar
Pazner, Elisha A. (1972), ‘Merit Wants and the Theory of Taxation’, Public Finance, 27, 4, pp. 460–72.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. (1972), The Economics of Welfare, 4th edition, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Pulsipher, Alan G. (1971), ‘The Properties and Relevancy of Merit Goods’, Finanzarchiv, 30, 2, pp. 266–86.Google Scholar
Roskamp, Karl. W. (1975), ‘Public Goods, Merit Goods, Private Goods, Pareto Optimum, and Social Optimum’, Public Finance, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 61–9.Google Scholar
Charles, Taylor (1986), ‘Irreducibly Social Goods’, mimeo (paper presented to ISPE Conference, Australian National University, December 1986).Google Scholar
Tiebout, Charles M. and Houston, David B. (1962), ‘Metropolitan Finance Reconsidered: Budget Functions and Multi-Level Governments’, Review of Economics and Statistics, pp. 412–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cliff, Walsh (1980), ‘Excludable Public Goods: On Their Nature and Significance’, mimeo, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
Cliff, Walsh (1984), ‘Political Economy of Capital Gains Tax’, Australian Tax Forum, Vol. 1, No. 2 (06), pp. 223–38.Google Scholar
Cliff, Walsh (1985), ‘Elements of a Fiscal Politics: Public Choice and Public Finance – A Commentary’, Australian Economic Review, 3 (12), pp. 73–6.Google Scholar
Walsh, Cliff 1986), ‘Packaging Tax Reform: Economic Analysis and Political Reality’, in Head, J. G. (ed.) Changing the Tax Mix, Australian Tax Research Foundation, Sydney.Google Scholar
Wenzel, Dieter H. and Wiegard, Wolfgang (1981), “Merit Goods and Second-Best Taxation”, Public Finance, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 125–39.Google Scholar