Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-wlffp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-30T04:37:38.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Creeping Universalism in the Welfare State: Evidence from Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Robert E. Goodin  and
Julian Le Grand
Robert E. Goodin
Affiliation:
Government University of Essex
Julian Le Grand
Affiliation:
ST/ICERD and Economics London School of Economics
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There are good reasons to suppose that the non-poor will infiltrate welfare programmes originally targeted on the poor. This paper discusses this phenomenon of ‘creeping universalisation’ and provides a number of possible explanations for it. Evidence is used from Australia to show that creeping universalisation does indeed occur, and to test the competing explanations. It is concluded that the most likely explanation for the phenomenon is individual behavioural responses: that is, the non-poor respond to the imposition of a means-test by re-arranging their affairs, legitimately or illegitimately, so as to pass the test.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , July 1986 , pp. 255 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Atiyah, P. S. (1980), Accidents, Compensation and the Law, 3rd ed., London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. B., Hills, J. and Le Grand, J., (1986), ‘The welfare state in Britain, 1970–1985: extent and effectiveness’, London School of Economics: Welfare State Programme Discussion Paper No. 9.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1983), ‘A theory ofcompetition among pressure groups for political influence’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 98, 371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, D. E. (1985), ‘Policy weakness and political opportunities’, Social Service Review 39, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia, various years, Yearbook for the Commonwealth of Australia, Melbourne: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia, Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), various years, Census of Population and Housing, Canberra: ABS.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia, Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), various years, (1982a), Estimated Resident Population by Sex and Age: State and Territories in Australia, June 1971 to June 1981, Cat. No. 320.10, Canberra: ABS. Revised series.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia, Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), various years, (1982b), Handicapped Persons in Australia, 1981, Canberra: ABS.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia, Department of Education, various years, Report on the Operation of the Student Assistance Act, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia, Department of Social Security (DSS), various years, Annual Report, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia, Department of Social Security (DSS), various years, (1979). Characteristics of Social Security Pensions – Time Series, Canberra: DSS.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia, Department of Social Security (DSS), various years, (1983), Developments in Social Security: a compendium of legislative changes since 1908, Research Paper no. 20, Research & Statistics Branch, Development Division, Canberra: DSS.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia, Social Welfare Policy Secretariat (SWPS) (1980), Commonwealth Spending on Income Support Between 1968–69 and 1978–799 and Why It Increased, Canberra: SWPS.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia, Treasury, various years, Invalid and Old Age Pensions: Report, Canberra: Treasury.Google Scholar
D'Amato, A. (1983), ‘Legal uncertainty’, California Law Review 71, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, A. (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1960), ‘Why the government budget is too small in a democracy’, World Politics 12, 541–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunleavy, P. (1985), ‘Bureaucrats, budgets and the growth of the state’, British Journal of Political Science 15 (3), 299–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durbin, J. (1970), ‘Testing for serial correlation in least squares regressions when some of the regressors are lagged dependent variables’, Econometrica 38, 410–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, N. (1977), ‘The transformation of social services’, Social Service Review 51, 624–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, N. (1982), ‘The plight of universal social services’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1 (3), 301–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodin, R. E. (1982), ‘Rational politicians and rational bureaucracies in Washington and Whitehall’, Public Administration (London) 60, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R. E. (1986), ‘Erring on the side of kindness in social welfare policy’, Policy Sciences 18, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. A. (1983), The Australian Welfare State, 2nd ed., Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Jamrozik, A. (1983), ‘The economy, social inequalities and the welfare state: implications of research’, paper delivered to the ANZAAS Congress, Perth.Google Scholar
Kewley, T. H. (1973), Social Security in Australia, 1900–72, 2nd ed., Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. (1982), The Strategy of Equality, London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. and Winter, D. (forthcoming), ‘The middle class and the welfare state’, London School of Economics: Welfare State Programme Discussion Paper No. 14.Google Scholar
Liebman, L. (1976), ‘The definition of disability in Social Security and Supplementary. Security Income’, Harvard Law Review 89, 833–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLean, I, and Pincus, J. (1982), ‘Living standards in Australia 1890–1940: evidence and conjectures’, Working Papers in Economic History No. 6, RSSS, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Marris, R. (1964), The Economic Theory of Managerial Capitalism, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, D. C. (1979), Public Choice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Niskanen, W. A. Jr (1971), Bureaucracy and Representative Government, Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
Olson, M. Jr (1965), The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. Jr (1982), The Rise and Decline of Nations, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Peltzman, S. (1980), ‘The growth of government’, Journal of Law and Economics 23, 209–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schorr, A. (1980), … Thy Father and thy Mother …:a Second Look at Filial Responsibility and Family Policy, Social Security Administration publication no. 13–11953, Washington DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. (1970), ‘Director's law of public income redistribution’, Journal of Law and Economics 13, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, D. A. (1984), The Disabled Stale, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titmuss, R. M. (1958), ‘The social division of welfare’, in Titmuss, R. M., Essays on ‘the welfare state’, pp. 34–55, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. (1979), Speaking the Truth to Power, Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Withers, G. A. and Pope, D. (1984), ‘Post-war immigration and Australian unemployment’, Working Papers in Economic History no. 21, RSSS, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar