Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-hp6zs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-18T12:10:01.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of warm beam electrons on electrostatic-shock solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

M. Dey ,
U. N. Das ,
K. S. Goswami  and
S. Bujarbarua
M. Dey
Affiliation:
Centre of Plasma Physics, Near Chaliha Ware House, Dispur, Guwahati 781 006, Assam, India
U. N. Das
Affiliation:
Centre of Plasma Physics, Near Chaliha Ware House, Dispur, Guwahati 781 006, Assam, India
K. S. Goswami
Affiliation:
Centre of Plasma Physics, Near Chaliha Ware House, Dispur, Guwahati 781 006, Assam, India
S. Bujarbarua
Affiliation:
Centre of Plasma Physics, Near Chaliha Ware House, Dispur, Guwahati 781 006, Assam, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We use a one-dimensional quasi-neutral fluid model to study the formation of an electrostatic shock associated with the lower-hybrid mode propagating almost perpendicularly to the magnetic field that exists in the auroral zone of the magnetosphere containing cold downward-streaming electrons, cold upward-streaming ions and beam electrons. We examine the effects of finite electron-beam temperature by describing the beam electrons with fluid equations. We then show how exact time-stationary shock solutions may be found when quasi-neutrality is considered.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , August 1992 , pp. 159 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bingham, R., Bryant, D. A. & Hall, D. S. 1988 Ann. Geophys. 6, 159.Google Scholar
Goswami, K. S. & Bujarbarua, S. 1985 Phys. Lett. 108 A, 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, K. S. & Bujarbarua, S. 1986 Phys. Fluids 29, 714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, K. S. & Bujarbarua, S. 1990 a Phys. Lett. 143 A, 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, K. S. & Bujarbarua, S. 1990 b Planet. Space Sci. 38, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mozer, F. S., Carlson, C. W., Hudson, M. K., Torbert, R. B., Parady, B. & Yatteau, J. 1977 Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mozer, F. S., Cattel, C. A., Hudson, M. K., Rysak, R. L., Temerin, M. & Torbert, R. B. 1980 Space Sci. Rev. 27, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mozer, F. S., Cattel, C. A., Torbert, R. B., Glinsky, S. V., Woldorff, M. & Wygant, J. 1979 J. Geophys. Res. 84, 5875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winske, D., Motohiko, T., Wu, C. S. & Quest, K. B. 1985 J. Geophys. Res. 90, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, E. & Hudson, M. K. 1986 a J. Geophys. Res. 91, 11217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, E. & Hudson, M. K. 1986 b Geophysics Monograph Series, no. 38 (ed. T., Chang), p. 334. American Geophysical Union.Google Scholar
Witt, E. & Lotko, W. 1983 Phys. Fluids 26, 2176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar