Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-tbj44 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T09:57:13.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Asterozoan (Echinodermata) Diversification: A Paleontologic Quandary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2015

Daniel B. Blake
Daniel B. Blake*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Rm. 208 NHB, University of Illinois, 1301 W. Green St., Urbana, IL 61801, USA,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Asterozoa as traditionally recognized is monophyletic, although ancestry within the Echinodermata is unknown. The asterozoan class Somasteroidea is most readily recognized by presence of series of simple ossicles termed virgals that extend laterally from each ambulacral ossicle. Virgal series reduction to two or three together with ossicular specializations provide apomorphies of the class Stenuroidea (new ranking). Both asteroid-like and ophiuroid-like configurations as well as expressions less suggestive of those of the surviving classes emerged within stenuroids during an early period of diversification. The classes Ophiuroidea and Asteroidea are separate lineages marked by virgal series reduction to a single ossicle and other ambulacral column specializations. It is uncertain whether one or both surviving classes were derived directly from somasteroids or originated through stenuroids. All three of the derived asterozoan classes can be argued to be either monophyletic and thereby justifying class status, or alternatively either paraphyletic or polyphyletic and thereby indicative of multiple plesions; here, monophyletic class-level status is favored for all three.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 87 , Issue 3 , May 2013 , pp. 353 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bartels, C., Briggs, D. E. G., and Brassel, G. 1998. The Fossils of the Hunsrück Slate: Marine Life in the Devonian. Cambridge Paleobiology Series, vol. 3. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 309p.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1858. On the Asteridae of the Lower Silurian rocks of Canada. Figures and descriptions of Canadian organic remains. Geological Survey of Canada, Dec. 3:75–85.Google Scholar
Blake, D. B. 1982. Somasteroidea, Asteroidea, and the affinities of Luidia (Platasterias) latiradiata. Palaeontology, 25:167–191.Google Scholar
Blake, D. B. 2000 a. The class Asteroidea (Echinodermata): Fossils and the base of the crown group. American Zoologist, 40:316–325.Google Scholar
Blake, D. B. 2000 b. An Archegonaster-like somasteroid (Echinodermata) from Pomeroy, Co. Tyrone, Northern Ireland. Irish Journal of Earth Sciences, 18:89–99.Google Scholar
Blake, D. B. 2007. Two Late Ordovician asteroids (Echinodermata) with characters suggestive of early ophiuroids. Journal of Paleontology, 81:1476–1485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, D. B. 2008. A new Ordovician asteroid (Echinodermata) with somasteroid-like skeletal elements. Journal of Paleontology, 82: 645–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, D. B. 2009. Re-evaluation of the Devonian family Helianthasteridae Gregory, 1899 (Asteroidea: Echinodermata). Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 83:293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, D. B., Bielert, F., and Bielert, U. 2006. New early crown-group asteroids (Echinodermata; Triassic of Germany). Palaeontologische Zeitschrift, 80:284–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, D. B. and Guensburg, T. E. 1993. New Lower and Middle Ordovician stelleroids (Echinodermata) and their bearing on the origins and early history of the stelleroid echinoderms. Journal of Paleontology, 67:103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, D. B. and Hagdorn, H. 2003. The Asteroidea (Echinodermata) of the Muschelkalk (Middle Triassic of Germany). Paleontologische Zeitschrift, 77:23–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, D. B. and Rozhnov, S. 2007. Aspects of life mode among Ordovician asteroids: Implications of new specimens from Baltica. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 53:519–533.Google Scholar
Blake, D. B., Tintori, A., and Hagdorn, H. 2000. A new, early crown-group asteroid (Echinodermata) from the Norian (Triassic) Calcare di Zorzino of northern Italy. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, 106:141–155.Google Scholar
Brusatte, S. L. 2010. Representing supraspecific taxa in higher-level phylogenetic analyses: guidelines for palaeontologists. Palaeontology, 53:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, J. 1999. What makes an ophiuroid? A morphological study of the problematic Ordovician stelleroid Stenaster and the palaeobiology of the earliest asteroids and ophiuroids. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 126:225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etheridge, R. 1899. On the occurrence of a starfish in the Upper Silurian series of Bowning, N. S. Wales. Records of the Australian Museum, 3:128–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fell, H. B. 1963. The phylogeny of sea-stars. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Ser. B, 246:381–435.Google Scholar
Gemmill, J. F. 1915. On the ciliation of asterids, and on the question of ciliary nutrition in certain species. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, J. W. 1897. The classification of the Palaeozoic echinoderms of the group Ophiuroidea. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1896:1028–1044.Google Scholar
Gregory, J. W. 1899. On Lindstromaster and the classification of the Palaeasterids. Geological Magazine, 6:341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, J. W. 1900. The Eleutherozoa—Stelleroidea, p. 237–281. InLankester, E. R.(ed.), A Treatise on Zoology, Pt. 3, The Echinoderma. Adam and Charles Black, London.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1868. Note on the genus Palaeaster, with descriptions of some new species, and observations upon those previously described. Twentieth Annual Report of the Regents of the University of the State of New York, on the Condition of the State Cabinet of Natural History and the Historical and Antiquarian Collection Annexed Thereto. New York State Cabinet Natural History, Appendix K14, p. 282–303.Google Scholar
Haude, R. 1982. Ophiuren (Echinodermata) aus dem Karbon des Rheinischen Schiefergebirges. Geologisches Jahrbuch Hessen, 110:5–26.Google Scholar
Haude, R. 1995. Echinodermen aus dem Unter-Devon der argentinischen Präkordillere. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 197:37–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, T. A., Hedtke, S. M., and Hillis, D. M. 2008. Taxon sampling and the accuracy of phylogenetic analyses. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 46:239–257.Google Scholar
Hotchkiss, F. H. C. 1976. Devonian ophiuroids from New York State: Reclassification of Klasmura, Antiquaster, and Stenaster into the suborder Scalarina nov., order Stenurida. New York State Museum, Bulletin 425, 39p.Google Scholar
Hotchkiss, F. H. C. 1993. A new Devonian ophiuroid (Echinodermata: Oegophiurida) from New York State and its bearing on the origin of ophiuroid upper arm plates. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 106:63–84.Google Scholar
Hotchkiss, F. H. C. and Glass, A. 2010. Bdellacoma in the Hunsrück Slate (Lower Devonian): Reidentification of Urasterella verruculosa (Asteroidea, Bdellacomidae), p. 15–21. InHarris, L. G., Böttger, S. A., Walker, C. W. and Lesser, M. P.(eds.), Echinoderms: Durham. CRC Press/Balkema, Leiden.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1903. Asteriden und Ophiuriden aus dem Silur Böhmens. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, 55:106–113.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1923. Zur Morphogenie der Asterozoa. Palaeontologischen Zeitschrift, 5:344–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jangoux, M. 1982. Food and feeding mechanisms: Asteroidea, p. 117–160. InJangoux, M. and Lawrence, J. M.(eds.), Echinoderm Nutrition. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Jefferies, R. P. S. 1986. The Ancestry of the Vertebrates. British Museum (Natural History), London, 376p.Google Scholar
Kesling, R. V. 1964. A drastic reappraisal of “Lepidasterella babcocki Schuchert”—as Helianthaster gyalinus Clarke, a streptophiuran auluroid. Contributions from The Museum of Paleontology, The University of Michigan, 19:115–133.Google Scholar
Kesling, R. V. 1969. Three Permian starfish from Western Australia and their bearing on revision of the Asteroidea. Contributions from The Museum of Paleontology, The University of Michigan, 22:361–376.Google Scholar
Kesling, R. V. 1971 a. Antiquaster magrumi, a new unusual brittle-star from the Middle Devonian Silica Formation of northwestern Ohio. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, The University of Michigan, 23:181–191.Google Scholar
Kesling, R. V. 1971 b. Michiganaster inexpectatusi, a new many-armed starfish from the Middle Devonian Rogers City Limestone of Michigan. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, The University of Michigan, 23:247–262.Google Scholar
Kesling, R. V. 1982. Acinetaster konieckiii, a new brittle-star from the Middle Devonian Arkona Shale. Contributions from the The Museum of Paleontology, The University of Michigan, 26:71–81.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W. M. 1957. Die Asterozoen in den Dachschiefern des rheinischen Unterdevons. Abhandlungen des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung, 21, 160p.Google Scholar
MacBride, E. W. 1906. Echinodermata, p. 425–623. InHarmer, S. F. and Shipley, A. E.(eds.), The Cambridge Natural History, Vol. 1. MacMillian and Co., London.Google Scholar
MacBride, E. W. 1907. The development of Ophiothrix fragilis. The Quarterly Journal of the Microscopical Society, 51:557–606.Google Scholar
McKnight, D. G. 1977. Classification of somasteroids and asteroids (Asterozoa: Echinodermata). Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 5:13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mah, C. L. and Blake, D. B. 2012. Global diversity and phylogeny of the Asteroidea (Echinodermata). PLoS One 7 (4): e35644doi:10.1371/journal.-pone.0035644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikulás, R. 1992. The ichnogenus Asteriacites: palenvironmental trends. Vestnik Ceského Geologického ústavu, 67:423–433.Google Scholar
Mooi, R. and David, B. 2000. What a new model of skeletal homologies tells us about asteroid evolution. American Zoologist 40:326–339.Google Scholar
Müller, A. H. 1963. Lehrbuch der Paläozoologie, vol. 2, Invertebraten, Pt. 3, Arthropoda 2–Stomochorda. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, 698p.Google Scholar
Müller, J. and Troschel, F. H. 1840. Beobachtungen über die Asteriensammlung des Zoologischen Museum. Monatsberichte der Königlichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1840:100–106.Google Scholar
O'Neill, P. L. 1989. Structure and mechanics of starfish body wall. Journal of Experimental Biology, 147:53–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Neill, P. L. 1990. Torsion in the asteroid ray. Journal of Morphology, 203:141–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owen, H. G. 1965. The British Palaeozoic Asterozoa. Table of Contents, Supplement and Index. Palaeontographical Society of London Monograph (for 1964),p. 541–583.Google Scholar
Paul, C. R. C. and Smith, A. B. 1984. The early radiation and phylogeny of echinoderms. Biological Reviews, 59:443–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philip, G. M. 1965. Ancestry of sea-stars. Nature, 208:766–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisani, D., Feuda, R., Peterson, K. J., and Smith, A. B. 2012. Resolving phylogenetic signal from noise when divergence is rapid: a new look at the old problem of echinoderm class relationships. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 62:27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roemer, F. 1863. Neue Asteriden und Crinoiden aus devonischem Dachschiefer von Bundenbach bei Birkenfeld. Palaeontographica, 9:143–152.Google Scholar
Ruedemann, R. 1916. Account of some new or little-known species of fossils, mostly from the Paleozoic rocks of New York. New York State Museum Bulletin, 189:7–97.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1857. On some new Palaeozoic star-fishes. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Ser. 2, 20:321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schöndorf, F. 1910. Über einige “Ophiuriden und Asteriden” des englischen Silur und ihre Bedeutung für die Systematik paläozoischer Seesterne. Jahrbüchern des Nassauischen Vereins für Naturkunde in Wiesbaden, 63:206–256.Google Scholar
Schuchert, C. 1915. Revision of Paleozoic Stelleroidea with special reference to North American Asteroidea. U. S. National Museum Bulletin 88, 311p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackleton, J. D. 2005. Skeletal homologies, phylogeny and classification of the earliest asterozoan echinoderms. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 3:29–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. B. and Jell, P. A. 1990. Cambrian edrioasteroids from Australia and the origin of starfishes. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 28:715–778.Google Scholar
Sollas, W. J. and Sollas, I. B. J. 1912. Lapworthura: a typical brittlestar of Silurian age; with suggestions for a new classification of the Ophiuroidea. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 202B:213–232.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1914 –1940.The British Palaeozoic Asterozoa. Palaeontographical Society of London Monograph, Pts. 1–10 (for 1913–1940),540p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1914. The British Palaeozoic Asterozoa. Palaeontographical Society of London Monograph, Pt. 1 (for 1913),p. 1–56.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1916. The British Palaeozoic Asterozoa. Palaeontographical Society of London Monograph, Pt. 2 (for 1915),p. 57–108.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1918. The British Palaeozoic Asterozoa. Palaeontographical Society of London Monograph, Pt. 3 (for 1916),p. 109–168.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1919. The British Palaeozoic Asterozoa. Palaeontographical Society of London Monograph, Pt. 4 (for 1917),p. 169–196.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1922. The British Palaeozoic Asterozoa. Palaeontographical Society of London Monograph, Pt. 5 (for 1920),p. 197–236.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1925. The British Palaeozoic Asterozoa. Palaeontographical Society of London Monograph, Pt. 6 (for 1922),p. 237–324.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1927. The British Palaeozoic Asterozoa. Palaeontographical Society of London Monograph, Pt. 7 (for 1925),p. 325–388.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1934. The British Palaeozoic Asterozoa. Palaeontographical Society of London Monograph, Pt. 9 (for 1933),p. 437–494.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1940. The British Palaeozoic Asterozoa. Palaeontographical Society of London Monograph, Pt. 10 (for 1940), p. 495–540.Google Scholar
Spencer, W. K. 1951. Early Palaeozoic starfish. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Ser. B, 235:87–129.Google ScholarPubMed
Spencer, W. K. and Wright, C. W. 1966. Asterozoans, p. U4–U107. InMoore, R. C.(ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. U, Echinodermata 3 (1). The Geological Society of America and The University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Stuertz, B. 1886. Beitrag zur Kenntniss palaeozoischer Seesterne. Palaeontographica, 32:75–98.Google Scholar
Stuertz, B. 1899. Ein weiterer Beitrag zur Kenntnis palaeozoischer Asteroiden. Verhandlungen des Naturhistorischen Vereins der Preussischen Rheinlande, Westfalens und des Regierungs-Bezirks Osnabrück, 56:176–240.Google Scholar
Stuertz, B. 1890. Neuer Beitrag zur Kenntniss palaeozoischer Seesterne. Palaeontographica, 36:203–247.Google Scholar
Sutton, M. D., Briggs, D. E. G., Siveter, D. J., Siveter, D. J., and Gladwell, D. J. 2005. A starfish with three-dimensionally preserved soft parts from the Silurian of England. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Ser. B, 272:1001–1006.Google ScholarPubMed
Thoral, M. 1935. Deuxième Thèse. Contribution à l'étude paléontologique de l'Ordovicien inférieur de la Montagne Noire et Révision sommaire de la faune cambrienne de la Montagne Noire. Thèses présentées a la faculté des sciences de l'Université de Paris pour obtenir le grade de docteur ès-sciences naturelles. Sér. A, No. 1541, No. D'Ordre: 2407. Imprimerie de la manufacture de la charité (Pierre-Rouge), Montpellier, 363p.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1953. Classe des Stelléroïdes, p. 774–842. InJ. Piveteau, Traité de Paléontologie, vol. 3.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1967. General characters of Echinodermata, p. S3–S60. InMoore, R. C.(ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. S, Echinodermata 1 (1). The Geological Society of America and The University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Warner, G. F. 1982. Food and feeding mechanisms: Ophiuroidea, p. 161–181. InJangoux, M. and Lawrence, J. M.(eds.), Echinoderm Nutrition. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Wells, J. W. 1952. A specimen of the starfish Ptilonaster from the Upper Devonian of central New York. Journal of Paleontology, 26:120–122.Google Scholar