Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T20:34:43.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The earliest Gastrochaenolites (Early Pennsylvanian, Arkansas, USA): An upper Paleozoic bivalve boring?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Mark A. Wilson  and
Timothy J. Palmer
Mark A. Wilson
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, The College of Wooster, Wooster, Ohio 44691
Timothy J. Palmer
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3DB, United Kingdom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Borings of the ichnogenus Gastrochaenolites have been found in limestone cobbles of the Morrowan (Early Pennsylvanian) Cane Hill Member of the Hale Formation in northwestern Arkansas. They were likely excavated by lithophagid bivalves, thus extending the earliest record of obligate bivalve boring back from the Triassic into the upper Paleozoic. These borings are herein referred to as G. anauchen n. ichnosp. Lithophagid borings may be rare in the upper Paleozoic because of the absence or scarcity of suitable substrates, such as scleractinian corals or carbonate hardgrounds. Additional upper Paleozoic bivalve borings will likely be discovered in other carbonate-rich rocky shore deposits.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 72 , Issue 4 , July 1998 , pp. 769 - 772
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baird, G. C. 1976. Coral encrusted concretions: a key to recognition of a ‘shale on shale’ erosion surface. Lethaia, 9:293–302.Google Scholar
Bromley, R. G. 1972. On some ichnotaxa in hard substrates with a redefinition of Trypanites Mägdefrau. Paläontologisches Zeitschrift Berlin, 46:93–98.Google Scholar
Ekdale, A. A., Bromley, R. G., and Pemberton, S. G. 1984. Ichnology: the use of trace fossils in sedimentology and stratigraphy. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Short Course, 15:1–317.Google Scholar
Fürsich, F. T., Palmer, T. J. and Goodyear, K. L. 1994. Growth and disintegration of bivalve-dominated patch reefs in the Upper Jurassic of southern England. Palaeontology, 37:131–171.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. E. 1988. Why are ancient rocky shores so uncommon? Journal of Geology, 96:469–480.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. E. 1992. Studies on ancient rocky shores: a brief history and annotated bibliography. Journal of Coastal Research, 8:797–812.Google Scholar
Kelly, S. R. A. 1980. Hiatella—a Jurassic squatter? Palaeontology, 23:769–781.Google Scholar
Kelly, S. R. A., and Bromley, R. G. 1984. Ichnological nomenclature of clavate borings. Palaeontology, 27:793–807.Google Scholar
Kleemann, K. 1990. Evolution of chemically-boring Mytilidae (Bivalvia), p. 111–124. In Morton, B. (ed.), The Bivalvia. Proceedings of the Memorial Symposium for Sir C. M. Yonge, Edinburgh, 1986. University Press, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Kleemann, K. 1994. Mytilid bivalve Lithophaga in Upper Triassic coral Pamiroseris from Zlambach Beds compared with Cretaceous Lithophaga alpina . Facies, 30:151–154.Google Scholar
Kleemann, K. 1996. Biocorrosion by bivalves. Marine Ecology, 17:145–158.Google Scholar
Leymerie, M. A. 1842. Suite de mémoire sur le terrain Crétacé du département de l'Aube. Mem. Soc. géol. France, 5:1–34.Google Scholar
Manger, W. L. 1977. Stop descriptions—first day, p. 11–17. In Sutherland, P. K. and Manger, W. L. (eds.), Upper Chesterian-Morrowan Stratigraphy and the Mississippian-Pennsylvanian Boundary in Northeastern Oklahoma and Northwestern Arkansas. Oklahoma Geological Survey Guidebook 18.Google Scholar
Palmer, T. J. 1982. Cambrian to Cretaceous changes in hardground communities. Lethaia, 15:309–323.Google Scholar
Pojeta, J. Jr., and Palmer, T. J. 1976. The origin of rock boring in mytilacean pelecypods. Alcheringa, 1:167–179.Google Scholar
Rice, M. E. 1969. Possible boring structures of sipunculids. American Zoologist, 9:803–812.Google Scholar
Scott, P. J. B. 1988. Distribution, habitat and morphology of the Caribbean coral- and rock-boring bivalve, Lithophaga bisulcata (d'Orbigny) (Mytilidae: Lithophaginae). Journal of Molluscan Studies, 54:83–95.Google Scholar
Signor, P. W. and Brett, C. E. 1984. The mid-Paleozoic precursor to the Mesozoic marine revolution. Paleobiology, 10:229–245.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1977. The Mesozoic faunal revolution: evidence from snails, predators and grazers. Paleobiology, 3:245–258.Google Scholar
Warme, J. E. and McHuron, E. 1978. Marine borers: trace fossils and geological significance, p. 77–131. In Basan, P. B. (ed.), Trace Fossil Concepts. SEPM short course 5.Google Scholar
Webb, G. E. 1993. A Lower Pennsylvanian encrusting tabulate coral from a rocky shore environment developed on the Mississippian-Pennsylvanian unconformity surface in northwestern Arkansas. Journal of Paleontology, 67:1064–1068.Google Scholar
Webb, G. E. 1994. Paleokarst, paleosol, and rocky-shore deposits at the Mississippian-Pennsylvanian unconformity, northwestern Arkansas. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 106:634–648.Google Scholar
West, R. R. and Palmer, T. J. 1983. Subaerially formed “hardground” in the Upper Carboniferous of North America [abs.]. First International Congress on Paleoecology, Lyon, France, July 18-23, 1983; abstract no. 155.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. A. 1985. Disturbance and ecologic succession in an Upper Ordovician cobble-dwelling hardground fauna. Science, 228:575–577.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. A. 1986. Coelobites and spatial refuges in a Lower Cretaceous cobble-dwelling hardground fauna. Palaeontology, 29:691–703.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. A. 1987. Ecological dynamics on pebbles, cobbles and boulders. Palaios, 2:594–599.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. A. 1997. Pleistocene and recent borings in lithologic substrates on San Salvador Island, The Bahamas, p. 41–46. In Curran, H. A. (ed.), Guide to Bahamian Ichnology: Pleistocene, Holocene, and Modern Environments. Bahamian Field Station, San Salvador, Bahamas.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. A., Ozanne, C. R., and Palmer, T. J. 1998. Origin and paleoecology of free-rolling oyster accumulations (ostreoliths) in the Middle Jurassic of southwestern Utah, USA. Palaios, 13:70–78.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. A., and Palmer, T. J. 1988. Nomenclature of a bivalve boring from the Upper Ordovician of the midwestern United States. Journal of Paleontology, 62:306–308.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. A., and Palmer, T. J. 1992. Hardgrounds and hardground faunas. University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Institute of Earth Studies Publications, 9:1–131.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. B. 1962. A revision of the Scottish Carboniferous lamellibranch species erected by R. Etheridge jun. Great Britain, Geological Survey, Bulletin, 19:53–72.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. B. 1965. A revision of some Carboniferous species of “Modiola” . Great Britain, Geological Survey, Bulletin, 23:9–14.Google Scholar