Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7xsfk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T23:20:01.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study on the development and trend of COLREGs – A broader perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2023

Wenhai Dong Open the ORCID record for Wenhai Dong [Opens in a new window] ,
Jie Li  and
Xinghua Tu
Wenhai Dong*
Affiliation:
Merchant Marine College, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China
Jie Li
Affiliation:
Merchant Marine College, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China
Xinghua Tu
Affiliation:
Merchant Marine College, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China
*
*Corresponding author: Wenhai Dong; Email: whdong@shmtu.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With the rapid development of the maritime industry and the emergence of unmanned ships, it is necessary to continuously review the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (1972, COLREGs). This paper provides an overview of the developing history of the COLREGs and summarises the interpretations made by the International Maritime Organization official and academic scholars. Additionally, the paper discusses the application of the COLREGs in collision avoidance geometry and autonomous collision avoidance systems. Furthermore, the necessity and key points of revisions to adapt to industry advancements are discussed, along with an analysis of the main challenges faced. Finally, in light of the continuous progress and implementation of the outcome of the Regulatory Scoping Exercise for the Use of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS), the paper points out that achieving consistency between manned and unmanned vessels, as well as developing COLREGs-based autonomous collision avoidance systems for more complex scenarios, is expected to be a significant trend in the future.

Keywords

COLREGsdevelopment and trendinterpretation and applicationrevision
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 76 , Issue 4-5 , July 2023 , pp. 577 - 589
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of Navigation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Belcher, P. (2002). A sociological interpretation of the COLREGS. Journal of Navigation, 55, 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, L. (2017). All Hands Off Deck? The Legal Barriers to Autonomous Ships. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3025882 (accessed 5 April 2023).Google Scholar
Chen, Q., Lau, Y.-Y., Zhang, P., Dulebenets, M. A., Wang, N. and Wang, T.-N. (2023). From concept to practicality: Unmanned vessel research in China. Heliyon, 9, e15182.Google ScholarPubMed
Cockcroft, A. N. (2010). A Manœuvring diagram for avoiding collisions at Sea. Journal of Navigation, 25, 105–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockcroft, A. N. and Lameijer, J. N. F. (2012). Preface. A Guide to the Collision Avoidance Rules, 7th Edn. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. W. (2001). Removal of an ambiguity from the maritime collision regulations. Journal of Navigation, 54, 477–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danish Maritime Authority (DMA)(2017). Analysis of Regulatory Barriers to the Use of Autonomous Ships. Final Report. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Martime Authority.Google Scholar
García Maza, J. A. and Argüelles, R. P. (2022). COLREGs and their application in collision avoidance algorithms: A critical analysis. Ocean Engineering, 261, 112029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannaford, E., Maes, P. and Van Hassel, E. (2022). Autonomous ships and the collision avoidance regulations: A licensed deck officer survey. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 21, 233–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hongguang, L. (2019). Research on Multi-Ship Collision Avoidance and Path Planning Based on Electronic Chart. Doctor. Doctor of Engineering, Dalian Maritime University.Google Scholar
House, D. J. (2007). Ship Handling: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, L., Hu, H., Naeem, W. and Wang, Z. (2022). A review on COLREGs-compliant navigation of autonomous surface vehicles: From traditional to learning-based approaches. Journal of Automation and Intelligence, 1, 100003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ILO. (2020). Maritime labour convention, 2006, as amended (Including 2018 amendments). International Labour Office. Geneva: International Labour Organization, 64–68.Google Scholar
IMO. (1986). General Provisions on Ships' Routeing (Resolution A.572(14)) [online]. London: International Maritime Organization. Available at: https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/AssemblyDocuments/A.572(14).pdf (accessed 10 April 2023).Google Scholar
IMO. (2017). Work Programme Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships Proposal for a Regulatory Scoping Exercise. Maritime Safety Committee(98th session), 2017 London. London: International Maritime Organization.Google Scholar
IMO. (2018). Framework for the Regulatory Scoping Exercise for the Use Of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS). Maritime Safety Committee(100th session), 2018 London. London: International Maritime Organization.Google Scholar
IMO. (2021). Outcome of the Regulatory Scoping Exercise for the Use of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS). Maritime Safety Committee(103rd session), 2021 London. London: International Maritime Organization.Google Scholar
IMO. (2023). Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (COLREGs) [Online]. London: International Maritime Organization. Available at: https://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/Pages/COLREG.aspx (accessed 21 March 2023).Google Scholar
Jianjun, W., Mingjun, L. and Yang, Z. (2021). Ship Collision Avoidance and Watchkeeping. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Jie, L., Zhangfeng, N., Hao, S. and Peng, Z. (2022). Analysis of the obligations and responsibilities of anchored vessels in vessel collision avoidance. American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 7, 56–61.Google Scholar
Kemp, J. (2008). When Do collision regulations begin to apply? Journal of Navigation, 62, 167–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennard, A., Zhang, P. and Rajagopal, S. (2022). Technology and training: How will deck officers transition to operating autonomous and remote-controlled vessels? Marine Policy, 146, 105326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyu, H. G. P., Yin, T. Q., Y. and Bai, Y. M. (2020). Amendments to international regulations for preventing collisions at Sea, 1972 in context of intelligent ships. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University, 41, 117–124.Google Scholar
Mahapatra, A. K. (2020). Rules of the road and the digital helmsman: an analytical review of the COLREG in the context of autonomous ships (Degree-iii). Master, World Maritime University.Google Scholar
Miyoshi, T., Fujimoto, S. and Rooks, M. (2021). Study of principles in COLREGs and interpretations and amendments COLREGs for maritime autonomous surface ships (MASS). Transactions of Navigation, 6, 11–18.Google Scholar
Miyoshi, T., Fujimoto, S., Rooks, M., Konishi, T. and Suzuki, R. (2022). Rules required for operating maritime autonomous surface ships from the viewpoint of seafarers. Journal of Navigation, 75, 384–399.Google Scholar
Öztürk, Ü, Akdağ, M. and Ayabakan, T. (2022). A review of path planning algorithms in maritime autonomous surface ships: Navigation safety perspective. Ocean Engineering, 251, 111010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salinas, C. F., Peña, V., Pérez, G. and Horton, T. L. (2012). Not under command. Journal of Navigation, 65, 753–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shengke, N. (2020). Study on key technologies for ship intelligent decision making for collision avoidance based on rules. Doctor, Dalian Mairitime University.Google Scholar
Stitt, I. P. A. (2002). The COLREGS - time for a rewrite? Journal of Navigation, 55, 419–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szlapczynski, R. and Szlapczynska, J. (2015). A target information display for visualising collision avoidance Manoeuvres in various visibility conditions. Journal of Navigation, 68, 1041–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsou, M.-C. (2016). Multi-target collision avoidance route planning under an ECDIS framework. Ocean Engineering, 121, 268–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veal, R., Tsimplis, M. and Serdy, A. (2019). The legal status and operation of unmanned maritime vehicles. Ocean Development & International Law, 50, 1–26.Google Scholar
Vojković, G. and Milenković, M. (2020). Autonomous ships and legal authorities of the ship master. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8, 333–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C., Wang, N., Xie, G. and Su, S.-F. (2022). Survey on collision-avoidance navigation of maritime autonomous surface ships. Offshore Robotics, 1, 1–33.Google Scholar
Weber, H. (2009). Clarification of the steering and sailing rules of the COLREGS. Journal of Navigation, 48, 289–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikipedia. (2022). International Maritime Organization [Online]. USA: Wikimedia Foundation. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Maritime_Organization (accessed 20 May 2022).Google Scholar
Wikipedia. (2023). Autonomous Cargo Ship [Online]. USA: Wikimedia Foundation. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_cargo_ship (accessed 8 April 2023).Google Scholar
Wróbel, K., Gil, M., Huang, Y. and Wawruch, R. (2022). The vagueness of COLREG versus collision avoidance techniques—a discussion on the current state and future challenges concerning the operation of autonomous ships. Sustainability, 14, 16516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Z. L. and Zhao, Y. L. (2021). Ship Collision Avoidance and Watchkeeping. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University Press.Google Scholar
Xie, S., Chu, X. M., Liu, C. G. and Wu, Q. (2016). A review and prospect of ship intelligent collision avoidance system. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 34, 1–9.Google Scholar
Xin, J. (2006). Comprehension and amendment on such clause as to “not to impede the passage of another vessel” of the international regulation for preventing collision at Sea. Annual of China Maritime Law, 17, 422–429.Google Scholar
Xiuying, B. (2000). Study on ship's collision risk Index and collision avodance model. Ph.D. Doctor, Dalian Maritime University.Google Scholar
Xu, T., Guan, J. and Xia, W. (2020). Review on “a vessel of special construction or purpose” in relation to collision prevention. Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping, 4, 76–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yingjun, Z. and Zhai, P. (2022). Research progress and trend of autonomous collision avoidance technology for marine ships. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 48, 1–11.Google Scholar
Zhai, P., Zhang, Y. and Shaobo, W. (2022). Intelligent ship collision avoidance algorithm based on DDQN with prioritized experience replay under COLREGs. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10, 585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, D. (2007). A Guide to the Understanding and Application of the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, D. (2016). The urgent need to amend the international regulations for preventing collisions at sea. World Shipping, 39, 15–18.Google Scholar
Zhang, D. (2022). 50 years of the adoption of convention on the COLREGS:Retrospect and Prospe. World Shipping, 45, 1–5.Google Scholar
Zhang, P. and Tang, L. (2021). Ship Management: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, P. and Zhao, J. (2013). The obligations of an anchored vessel to avoid collision at Sea. Journal of Navigation, 66, 473–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X., Wang, C., Jiang, L., An, L. and Yang, R. (2021). Collision-avoidance navigation systems for maritime autonomous surface ships: A state of the art survey. Ocean Engineering, 235, 109380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, P. F., Chen, Q., Macdonald, T., Lau, Y. Y. and Tang, Y. M. (2022). Game change: A critical review of applicable collision avoidance rules between traditional and autonomous ships. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10, 1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao-lin, W. (2009). Analysis of radar PAD information and a suggestion to reshape the PAD. Journal of Navigation, 41, 124–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, J. (2008). When Do collision regulations begin to apply? Journal of Navigation, 61, 515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, X. Y., Huang, J. J., Wang, F. W., Wu, Z. L. and Liu, Z. J. (2020). A study of the application barriers to the use of autonomous ships posed by the good seamanship requirement of COLREGs. Journal of Navigation, 73, 710–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar