Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-hp6zs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-30T00:30:28.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of Some New Pharmacological Agents in Psychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

D. M. Leiberman  and
G. F. Vaughan
D. M. Leiberman
Affiliation:
Bexley Hospital, Kent
G. F. Vaughan
Affiliation:
Guy's Hospital, London; Wood Vale Children's Home
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The last five years have seen the beginning of a remarkable new development in the pharmacological approach to psychiatry. Pharmacological treatment for mental disorder is not, of course, new; drugs like hellebore, opium, camphor, bromides, paraldehyde and the barbiturates cover a large part of the history of psychiatric therapy. Since 1951 a number of new drugs with the generic title of tranquillizers have been introduced, of which the two best known are chlorpromazine and reserpine. They have the characteristic effect of producing sedation without producing sleep.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 103 , Issue 430 , January 1957 , pp. 110 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1957 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Avol, ML, and Vogel, P. J., J.A.M.A., 1955, 159, 1516.Google Scholar
Bair, H. V., and Herold, W., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1955, 74, 363.Google Scholar
Barsa, J. A., and Kline, W. S., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1955, 74, 280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsa, J. A., and Kline, N. S., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1956, 112, 684.Google Scholar
Bein, H. J., Gross, F., Tripod, J., and Meier, R., Schweiz. Med. Wschr., 1953, 83, 1007.Google Scholar
Burn, J. H., Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1954, 47, 445.Google Scholar
Carey, E. F., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1955, 61, 222.Google Scholar
Courvoisier, S., Fournal, J., DUCROT, R., Kolsky, M., and Koetschet, P., Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn., 1953, 92, 305.Google Scholar
Davies, D. L., and Shepherd, M., Lancet, 1955, ii, 117.Google Scholar
Dean, S. R., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1956, 112, 850.Google Scholar
Elkes, J., Brit. med. J., 1956, i, 512.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. T., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1955, 61, 101.Google Scholar
Folkson, A., and May, A. R., Brit. Med. J., 1955, ii, 1121.Google Scholar
Gaddum, J. H., J. Physiol., 1953, 121, 15P.Google Scholar
Gatski, R. L., J.A.M.A., 1955, 157, 1298.Google Scholar
Gellhorn, E., Physiological Foundations of Neurology and Psychiatry, 1953. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Gyermek, L., Lancet, 1955, ii, 724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himwich, H. E., J. nerv. Ment. Dis., 1955, 122, 413.Google Scholar
Hoch, P. H., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1956, 75, 325.Google Scholar
Hollister, L. E., Krieger, G. E., Kringal, A., and Roberts, R. H., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1955, 61, 92.Google Scholar
Horatz, K., Der Anaesthetist, 1954, 2, 193.Google Scholar
Idem , Munch. Med. Wschr., 1954, 96, 426.Google Scholar
Ingram, W. R., EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 1952, 4, 397.Google Scholar
Jasper, H. H., EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 1949, 1, 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinross-Wright, V., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1955, 61, 174.Google Scholar
Kline, N. S., and Stanley, A. M., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1955, 61, 85.Google Scholar
Kovitz, B., Carter, J. T., and Addison, W. P., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1955, 74, 467.Google Scholar
Leiberman, D. M., and Vaughan, G. F., Brit. Med. J., 1956, i, 512.Google Scholar
Lemere, F., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1955, 74, 1.Google Scholar
Moore, J. N. P., Brit. Med. J., 1956, i, 512.Google Scholar
Moruzzi, G., and Magoun, H. W., EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 1949, 1, 455.Google Scholar
Muller, J. C., Prior, W. W., Gibbons, J. E., and Orgain, E. S., J.A.M.A., 1955, 159, 836.Google Scholar
Niescholz, O., Arzneimittelforschg., 1954, 4, 232.Google Scholar
Pond, D. A., Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1954, 47, 775.Google Scholar
Pletscher, A., Shore, P. A., and Brodie, B. B., J. Pharm. Exp. Ther., 1956, 116, 84.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, F., and Himwich, H. E., Dis. Nerv. Syst., 1955, 16, 133.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, F., Rudy, L. A., and Himwich, H. E., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1956, 112, 678.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. H., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1955, 61, 92.Google Scholar
Sainz, A. A., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1955, 61, 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargant, W., Brit. Med. J., 1956, i, 939.Google Scholar
Schroeder, H. A., and Perry, H. M., J.A.M.A., 1955, 159, 839.Google Scholar
Smirk, F. H., Lancet, 1955, ii, 115.Google Scholar
Sulman, F. G., and Winnick, H. Z., Lancet, 1956, i, 161.Google Scholar
Vaughan, G. F., Leiberman, D. M., and Cook, L. C., Lancet, 1955, i, 1083.Google Scholar
Watt, D., “Report on International Colloquium, Paris, 1955”, J. Canad. Med. Ass., 1955, 78, 989.Google Scholar
Weber, E., Schweiz. Med. Wschr., 1954, 84, 968.Google Scholar
Werenberg, H., Nordisk. Med., 1955, 54, 1787.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, F. T., and Burgemeister, B. B., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1955, 61, 215.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.