Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-t28k2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-17T21:35:36.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Study of the Sexual Life in Psychoses Associated with Childbirth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

E. W. Anderson
E. W. Anderson*
Affiliation:
Maudsley Hospital
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is now universally recognized that there is nothing specific in the form of psychoses associated with childbearing. There is, however, still a tendency to attribute to the puerperium itself or to pregnancy or lactation a significance quite out of proportion to that of other precipitating factors; thus such terms as “puerperal depression”, or “puerperal schizophrenia” are still in use, as if the precipitating factor were something special as opposed to the innumerable other causes assigned to the appearance of an attack of mental disorder. Nor is this surprising when one reflects on the enormous significance of the sexual life. One is quite willing on a priori grounds to grant to the puerperium this all-important rôle.

Information

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 79 , Issue 324 , January 1933 , pp. 137 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1933 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aschaffenburg, G., “Ueber die klinischen Formen der Wochenbetts-psychosen,” Allg. Zeitschr. f. Psychiat., 1901, Iviii, pp. 336–356.Google Scholar
Bourne, A. W., “Etiology and Prognosis of Puerperal Insanity,” Journ. Obstet, and Gyn. Brit. Etnp., 1924, xxxi, pp. 251–57.Google Scholar
Clarke, G., “The Forms of Mental Disorder in Connection with Childbearing,” Journ. Ment. Sei., 1913, lix, pp. 67–74.Google Scholar
Dupouy, quoted by Levy-Valensi, Paris Med., 1929, i, pp. 501–507.Google Scholar
Ellery, R., Australian Med. Journ., 1927, pp. 287–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galant, Monatsschr. f. Geburt, u. Gynäk., 1927, lxxvii, pp. 121–138.Google Scholar
Armstrong-Jones, Amer. Journ. Insanity, 1903, lix, pp. 601–620; Lancet, 1923, p. 1297.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick and Tiebout, Amer. Journ. Psych., 1926, p. 645.Google Scholar
L6vy-Valensi, op. cit. Google Scholar
MacCarthv, Amer. Journ. Obstet., 1915, lxxii, p. 269.Google Scholar
McIlroy, L., Lancet, February, 1928, i, pp. 379–381.Google Scholar
Saunders, E. B., Amer. Journ. Psych., 1929, viii. p. 669.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, H. A., ibid., 1899, pp. 56–69.Google Scholar
Tuttle, Journ. Nerv, and Ment. Dis., 1906, xxxiii, p. 790.Google Scholar
Zilboorg, G., Amer. Journ. Psych., viii, p. 773; Journ. Nerv, and Ment. Dis., 1928, Ixviii, pp. 370-383; Amer. Journ. Obstet, and Gyn., xv, pp. 145–158.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.