Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-scsgl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-12T17:15:16.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental Studies of a Perceptual Anomaly

IV. The Effect of Monocular Vision on Rotation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

A. J. Yates
A. J. Yates*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This is the fourth of a series of articles reporting an investigation into the Block Design Rotation Effect. This effect was first observed in some patients while they were doing the Goldstein Block Design Test, in which the subject has to reproduce patterns with the aid of coloured cubes. Some patients, while completing the designs correctly, would leave the completed pattern in a rotated position without apparently being aware of this (2). Such rotation frequently reached 45° (Illustration 1) but rarely exceeded this amount.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 100 , Issue 421 , October 1954 , pp. 975 - 979
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1954 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Holway, A. H., and Boring, E. G., ‘Determinants of Apparent Visual Size with Distance Variant’, Amer. J. Psychol., 1941, 54, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Shapiro, M. B., ‘Experimental Studies of a Perceptual Anomaly. I. Initial Experiments’, J. Ment. Sci., 1951, 97, 90.Google Scholar
3. Idem , ‘Experimental Studies of a Perceptual Anomaly. II. Confirmatory and Explanatory Experiments’, ibid., 1952, 98, 605.Google Scholar
4. Idem , ‘Experimental Studies of a Perceptual Anomaly. III. The Testing of an Explanatory Theory’, ibid., 1953, 99, 394.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.