Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-bw5xj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-19T07:50:25.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further Observations on Apraxia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

W. Mayer-Gross
W. Mayer-Gross*
Affiliation:
Maudsley Hospital, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In dealing with the question of visual impairment in cases of so-called constructional apraxia in a previous paper, I had occasion to discuss arguments put forward by Erich Feuchtwanger, who had proposed to abandon the term “apraxia” for this condition and to call the disturbance “agnosia”. My conclusion was in favour of the original concept of Kleist, who had put the ailment among the apractic syndromes. This, however, makes a detailed analysis of the motor activities and their disturbance in constructional apraxia necessary in order to define its place among the known kinds of apraxia.

Information

Type
Part I.—Introduction
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 82 , Issue 341 , November 1936 , pp. 744 - 762
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1936 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bychowski, Z., “Ueber die Restitution der nach einem Schädelschuss verloren-gegangenen Sprache bei einem Polyglotten”, Monats, f. Psychiat., 1919, xlv, p. 183.Google Scholar
Feucht-wanger, E., “Ueber optisch-konstruktive Agnosie”, Zeitschr. f. d. ges. Neurol., 1934, cli, p. 469.Google Scholar
Goldstein, K., Der Aufbau des Organismus, The Hague, 1934.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H., Selected Writings, London, 1932, ii, p. 46.Google Scholar
Kleist, K., Kriegsverletzungen des Gehirns, Leipzig, 1934.Google Scholar
Liepmann, H., “Apraxie”, Ergebn. d, gesamt. Medizin, 1, Berlin, 1920.Google Scholar
Mayer-Gross, W., “Some Observations on Apraxia”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1935, xxviii, p. 63.Google Scholar
Idem , “The Question of Visual Impairment in Constructional Apraxia”, ibid. 1936, xxix, p. 1396.Google Scholar
Idem and Guttmann, E., “The Problem of General as Against Focal Symptoms”, Journ. Ment. Sci., May, 1936.Google Scholar
Minkowski, M., “Klin. Beitrag zur Aphasie d. Polyglotten”, Schweiz. Arch. f. Neur. u. Psychiat., 1927, xxi, p. 43.Google Scholar
Piéron, H., “Principles of Exper. Psychol., London.”, 1929, p. 29.Google Scholar
Pitres, A., “Étude sur l'aphasie chez les polyglottes”, Rev. de Med., 1895, ii, p. 877.Google Scholar
Sittig, O., Ueber Apraxie, Berlin, 1931.Google Scholar
Wilson, Kinnier, “A Contribution to the Study of Apraxia”, Brain, 1908, xxxi, p. 165.Google Scholar
Vogt, C. and Vogt, O., “Zur Lehre von den Erkrankungen des striären Systems”, Journ. f. Psych. u. Neur., 1920, xxv, Ergänzungsheft 3.Google Scholar
Zutt, Z., “Rechts-Linksstörung, konstruktive Apraxie und reine Agraphie”, Monats. f. Psychiat., 1932, lxxxii, pp. 253, 355.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.