Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7xsfk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T17:59:46.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Finite Element Study of the Effect of Contact Forces Between an Implant-Retained Crown and its Adjacent Teeth on Bone Stresses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2011

E. Chaichanasiri ,
P. Nanakorn ,
W. Tharanon  and
J. Vander Sloten
E. Chaichanasiri*
Affiliation:
School of Manufacturing Systems and Mechanical Engineering, Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Pathumthani 12121, Thailand
P. Nanakorn*
Affiliation:
School of Civil Engineering and Technology, Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Pathumthani 12121, Thailand
W. Tharanon*
Affiliation:
Advanced Dental Technology Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Thailand Science Park, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
J. Vander Sloten*
Affiliation:
Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Heverlee B-3001, Belgium
*
*Graduate student
**Associate Professor, corresponding author
***Assistant Professor
****Professor
Get access

Abstract

Most of finite element (FE) models used to study single tooth dental implants consider only an isolated implant. It is of course more realistic to model also the adjacent teeth of the implant. However, including the adjacent teeth significantly increases the complexity of the model and necessitates the complex contact analysis. The main difference between the FE models with and without the adjacent teeth is that the model without the adjacent teeth cannot capture the effect of the contact forces that are transferred between the implant-retained crown and the adjacent teeth. In this study, the hypothesis that the contact forces are not important is verified by the FE contact analysis. Realistic 3D FE models of a mandible and a single tooth implant with and without adjacent teeth are constructed and analyzed. It is found from the results that the difference between the maximum bone stresses of the two models is very small when various loading directions are considered. The obtained results, therefore, indicate that the effect of contact forces between a dental implant and its adjacent teeth is not significant. Consequently, the adjacent teeth can be excluded from FE models if various loading directions are considered.

Keywords

Finite element analysisDental implantsTeethContact analysis.
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 441 - 450
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1.Andersen, E., Haanæs, H. R. and Knutsen, B. M., “Immediate Loading of Single-Tooth ITI Implants in the Anterior Maxilla: A Prospective 5-Year Pilot Study,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, 13, pp. 281–287 (2002).Google Scholar
2.Willer, J., Noack, N. and Hoffmann, J., “Survival Rate of IMZ Implants: A Prospective 10-Year Analysis,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 61, pp. 691–695 (2003).Google Scholar
3.Misch, C. E., Dental Implant Prosthetics, Elsevier Mosby, St. Louis (2005).Google Scholar
4.Schwartz-Arad, D., Kidron, N. and Dolev, E., “A Long-Term Study of Implants Supporting Overdentures as a Model for Implant Success,” Journal ofPeriodontology, 76, pp. 1431–1435 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Weinstein, A. M., Klawitter, J. J., Anand, S. C. and Schuessler, R., “Stress Analysis of Porous Rooted Dental Implants,” Journal of Dental Research, 55, pp. 772–777 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Rieger, M. R., Fareed, K., Adams, W. K. and Tanquist, R. A., “Bone Stress Distribution for Three Endosseous Implants,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 61, pp. 223–228 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Williams, K. R., Watson, C. J., Murphy, W. M., Scott, J., Gregory, M. and Sinobad, D., “Finite Element Analysis of Fixed Prostheses Attached to Osseointegrated Implants,” Quintessence International, 21, pp. 563–570 (1990).Google Scholar
8.Clelland, N. L., Ismail, Y. H., Zaki, H. S. and Pipko, D., “Three-Dimensional Finite Element Stress Analysis in and around the Screw-Vent Implant,” The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 6, pp. 391–398 (1991).Google Scholar
9.Canay, Ş., Hersek, N., Akpinar, I and Aşik, Z., “Comparison of Stress Distribution around Vertical and Angled Implants with Finite-Element Analysis,” Quintessence International, 27, pp. 591–598 (1996).Google Scholar
10.Meyer, U., Vollmer, D., Runte, C., Bourauel, C. and Joos, U., “Bone Loading Pattern around Implants in Average and Atrophic Edentulous Maxillae: A Finite-Element Analysis,” Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 29, pp. 100–105 (2001).Google Scholar
11.Ishigaki, S., Nakano, T., Yamada, S., Nakamura, T. and Takashima, F., “Biomechanical Stress in Bone Surrounding an Implant under Simulated Chewing,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, 14, pp. 97–102 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Çehreli, M. C., AkÇa, K. and İplikçioğlu, H., “Force Transmission of One- and Two-Piece Morse-Taper Oral Implants: A Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, 15, pp. 481–489 (2004).Google Scholar
13.Geramy, A. and Morgano, S. M., “Finite Element Analysis of Three Designs of an Implant-Supported Molar Crown,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 92, pp. 434–440 (2004).Google Scholar
14.Barbier, L., Vander Sloten, J., Krzesinski, G., Schepers, E. and Van Der Perre, G., “Finite Element Analysis of Non-Axial Versus Axial Loading of Oral Implants in the Mandible of the Dog,” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 25, pp. 847–858 (1998).Google Scholar
15.Holmgren, E. P., Seckinger, R. J., Kilgren, L. M. and Mante, F., “Evaluating Parameters of Osseointegrated Dental Implants Using Finite Element Analysis — A Two-Dimensional Comparative Study Examining the Effects of Implant Diameter, Implant Shape, and Load Direction,” Journal of Oral Implantology, 24, pp. 80–88 (1998).Google Scholar
16.Yokoyama, S., Wakabayashi, N., Shiota, M. and Ohyama, T., “The Influence of Implant Location and Length on Stress Distribution for Three-Unit Implant-Supported Posterior Cantilever Fixed Partial Dentures,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 91, pp. 234–240 (2004).Google Scholar
17.Holmes, D. C., Grigsby, W. R., Goel, V. K. and Keller, J. C., “Comparison of Stress Transmission in the IMZ Implant System with Polyoxymethylene or Titanium Intramobile Element: A Finite Element Stress Analysis,” The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 7, pp. 450–458 (1992).Google Scholar
18.Juodzbalys, G., Kubilius, R., Eidukynas, V. and Raustia, A. M., “Stress Distribution in Bone: Single-Unit Implant Prostheses Veneered with Porcelain or a New Composite Material,” Implant Dentistry, 14, pp. 166–175 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Chao, C. K. and Hsiao, C. C., “Parametric Study on Bone Screw Designs for Holding Power,” Journal of Mechanics, 22, pp. 13–18 (2006).Google Scholar
20.Sakaguchi, R. L. and Borgersen, S. E., “Nonlinear Finite Element Contact Analysis of Dental Implant Components,” The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 8, pp. 655–661 (1993).Google Scholar
21.Sakaguchi, R. L. and Borgersen, S. E., “Nonlinear Contact Analysis of Preload in Dental Implant Screws,” The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 10, pp. 295–302 (1995).Google Scholar
22.Versluis, A., Korioth, T. W. and Cardoso, A. C., “Numerical Analysis of a Dental Implant System Preloaded with a Washer,” The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 14, pp. 337–341 (1999).Google Scholar
23.Sevimay, M., Turhan, F., Kiliçarslan, M. A. and Eskitascioglu, G., “Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Effect of Different Bone Quality on Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Crown,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 93, pp. 227–234 (2005).Google Scholar
24.Berkovitz, B. K. B., Holland, G. R. and Moxham, B. J., Color Atlas and Textbook of Oral Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, 2nd Ed., Mosby Year Book, St. Louis (1992).Google Scholar
25.Natali, A. N., Dental Biomechanics, Taylor and Francis, London (2003).Google Scholar
26.Çağlar, A., Aydin, C., Özen, J., Yilmaz, C. and Korkmaz, T., “Effects of Mesiodistal Inclination of Implants on Stress Distribution in Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses,” The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 21, pp. 36–44 (2006).Google Scholar
27.Borchers, L. and Reichart, P., “Three-Dimensional Stress Distribution around a Dental Implant at Different Stages of Interface Development,” Journal of Dental Research, 62, pp. 155–159 (1983).Google Scholar
28.Van Oosterwyck, H., Duyck, J., Vander Sloten, J., Van Der Perre, G. and Naert, I., “Peri-Implant Bone Tissue Strains in Cases of Dehiscence: A Finite Element Study,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, 13, pp. 327–333 (2002).Google Scholar
29.Mellal, A., Wiskott, H. W. A., Botsis, J., Scherrer, S. S. and Belser, U. C., “Stimulating Effect of Implant Loading on Surrounding Bone. Comparison of Three Numerical Models and Validation by in Vivo Data,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, 15, pp. 239–248 (2004).Google Scholar
30.Rees, J. S. and Jacobsen, P. H., “Elastic Modulus of the Periodontal Ligament,” Biomaterials, 18, pp. 995–999 (1997).Google Scholar
31.Clement, R., Schneider, J., Brambs, H. J., Wunderlich, A., Geiger, M. and Sander, F. G., “Quasi-Automatic 3D Finite Element Model Generation for Individual Single-Rooted Teeth and Periodontal Ligament,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 73, pp. 135–144 (2004).Google Scholar
32.Ashman, R. B. and Van Buskirk, W. C., “The Elastic Properties of a Human Mandible,” Advances in Dental Research, 1, pp. 64–67 (1987).Google Scholar
33.Ash, M. M. and Nelson, S. J., Wheeler's Dental Anatomy, Physiology, and Occlusion, 8th Ed., Saunders, Philadelphia (2003).Google Scholar
34.Ferrario, V. F., Sforza, C., Serrao, G., Dellavia, C. and Tartaglia, G. M., “Single Tooth Bite Forces in Healthy Young Adults,” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 31, pp. 18–22 (2004).Google Scholar
35.Lovald, S. T., Khraishi, T., Wood, J., Wagner, J., Baack, B. and Kelly, J., “Finite Element Analysis of Screw-Plate Systems for Fixation of Parasymphyseal Fractures of the Mandible,” Journal of Mechanics, 23, pp. 69–78 (2007).Google Scholar