Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T05:41:29.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sintering temperature effects on nano triphasic bioceramic composite coated 316L SS for corrosion resistance, adhesion strength, and cell proliferation on implants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2020

R. Manonmani  and
T.M. Sridhar
R. Manonmani*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Rajalakshmi Engineering College, Chennai 602105, India
T.M. Sridhar
Affiliation:
Department of Analytical Chemistry, University of Madras, Chennai 600025, India
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: manosenthil.chem@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

The present work is mainly accentuated to improve corrosion resistance performance, adhesion strength, biocompatibility, and cell proliferation of metallic implants. Novel nano triphasic bioceramic composite coating was achieved on 316L SS by the electrophoretic deposition process followed by vacuum sintering. The optimized potential for composite coating on 316L SS was found to be 30 V and 1 min. All the composite coated samples were sintered in a vacuum furnace at various sintering temperature starting from 700 °C to 1000 °C for 1 h. The coated samples were thoroughly characterized in terms of crystallinity, morphology, and surface roughness by XRD, FESEM with EDX, and profilometer studies, respectively. In addition, the coated samples were mechanically characterized using a tap adhesion and Vickers microhardness test. Corrosion performance of the coated sample was characterized by electrochemical studies in Hank's solution. The in vitro cytotoxicity studies for cell viability and cell proliferation was carried out using MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cells. These studies revealed an enhanced cell attachment and proliferation on the composite-coated sample than the uncoated sample, which controlled the discharge of metal ions from the metal surface into the biological system.

Keywords

coatingsinteringbiomaterial
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 35 , Issue 6 , 30 March 2020 , pp. 580 - 590
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bordiji, K., Jouzeau, J., Mainard, D., and Payan, E.: Chapter 1-metallic biomaterials. Princ. Pract. 17, 1 (1972).Google Scholar
Semlitsch, M.: Implant metals for plates, screws, and artificial joints in bone surgery. Eng. Med. 2, 68 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivakumar, M., Kamachi Mudali, U., and Rajeswari, S.: Compatibility of ferritic and duplex stainless steels as implant materials: In vitro corrosion performance. J. Mater. Sci. 22, 6081 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaller, R.F., Mishra, A., and Rodelas, J.M.: The role of microstructure and surface finish on the corrosion of selective laser melted 304L. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, C234 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anantha, K.H., Ornek, C., Ejnermark, S., Medvedeva, A., Sjostrom, J., and Pan, J.: In situ AFM study of localized corrosion processes of tempered AISI 420 martensitic stainless steel: Effect of secondary hardening. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, C810 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ter-Ovanessian, B., Mary, N., and Normand, B.: Passivity breakdown of Ni–Cr alloys: From anions interactions to stable pits growth. J. Electrochem. Soc. 163, C410 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaliaraj, G.S., Vishwakarma, V., and Kirubaharan, A.K.: Biological and corrosion behavior of m-ZrO2 and t-ZrO2 coated 316L SS for potential biomedical applications. Ceram. Int. 44, 14940 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rondeli, G., Vicentini, B., and Cigada, A.: Stress corrosion cracking of stainless steels in high temperature caustic solutions. Corros. Sci. 6, 1037 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducheyne, P., Hench, L.L., Kagan, A., Martens, M., Burssens, A., and Muller, J.C.: The effect of hydroxyapatite impregnation on skeletal bonding of porous coated implants. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 14, 225 (1980).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pang, X. and Zhitomirsky, I.: Electrophoretic deposition of composite hydroxyapatite-chitosan coatings. Mater. Charact. 58, 339 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D.F.: Tissue-biomaterial interactions. J. Mater. Sci. 10, 3421 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, A.M., Adesina, A.Y., Hussein, M.A., Ramakrishna, S., Al-Aqeeli, N., Akhtar, S., and Saravanan, S.: PEDOT/FHA nano composite coatings on newly developed Ti–Nb–Zr implants: Biocompatibility and surface protection against corrosion and bacterial infections. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 98, 482 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojaee, R., Fathi, M., Raeissi, K., and Taherian, M.: Electrophoretic deposition of bioactive glass nanopowders on magnesium based alloy for biomedical applications. Ceram. Int. 6, 7879 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojaee, R., Fathi, M., and Raeissi, K.: Controlling the degradation rate of AZ91 magnesium alloy via sol–gel derived nanostructured hydroxyapatite coating. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 7, 3817 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, J., Yang, Z., Zhou, Y., Liu, Y., Li, K., and Lu, H.: Porous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics coated with nano-hydroxyapatite and seeded with mesenchymal stem cells for reconstruction of radius segmental defects in rabbits. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 26, 257 (2015).Google ScholarPubMed
Vinodhini, S.P., Venkatachalapathy, B., and Sridhar, T.M.: Bioresorbable whitlockite coatings on titanium by EPD for biomedical applications. J. Ceram. Process. Res. 17, 947 (2016).Google Scholar
Cannillo, V., Lusvarghi, L., and Sola, A.: Production and characterization of plasma-sprayed TiO2–hydroxyapatite functionally graded coatings. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 28, 2161 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukada, Y., Nagarajan, N., Mekky, W.S., Bao, Y., Kim, H.S., and Nicholson, P.S.: Electrophoretic deposition—mechanisms, myths and materials. J. Mater. Sci. 39, 787 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhitomirsky, I. and Gal-Or, L.: Electrophoretic deposition of hydroxyapatite. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. 8, 213 (1997).Google ScholarPubMed
Saremi, M., Mohajernia, S., and Hejazi, S.: Controlling the degradation rate of AZ31 Magnesium alloy and purity of nano-hydroxyapatite coating by pulse electrodeposition. Mater. Lett. 129, 111 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niespodziana, K., Jurczyk, K., Jakubowicz, J., and Jurczyk, M.: Fabrication and properties of titanium–hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. Mater. Chem. Phys. 1, 160 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruys, A.J., Wei, M., Sorrell, C.C., Dickson, M.R., Brandwood, A., and Milthorpe, B.K.: Sintering effects on the strength of hydroxyapatite. Biomaterials 5, 409 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sridhar, T.M. and Mudali, U.K.: Subbaiyan M Sintering atmosphere and temperature effects on hydroxyapatite coated type 316L stainless steel. Corros. Sci. 45, 2337–2359 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, M., Ruys, A.J., Swain, M.V., Kim, S.H., Milthorpe, B.K., and Sorrell, C.C.: Interfacial bond strength of electrophoretically deposited hydroxyapatite coatings on metals. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 7, 401 (1999).Google Scholar
Ruys, A.J., Zeigler, K.A., Milthorpe, B.K., and Sorrell, C.C.: Microwave sintering of ZrO2 fiber-reinforced hydroxyapatite matrix composites. In Ceramics: Adding the Value (CSIRO, Melbourne, 1992); p. 591.Google Scholar
Wei, M., Ruys, A.J., Milthorpe, B.K., Sorrell, C.C., and Evans, J.H.: Electrophoretic deposition of hydroxyapatite coatings on metal substrates: A nanoparticulate dual-coating approach. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2, 39 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosmann, T.: Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods 65, 55 (1983).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vinodhini, S.P., Manonmani, R., Venkatachalapathy, B., and Sridhar, T.M.: Interlayer TiO2–HAP composite layer for biomedical applications. RSC Adv. 6, 62344 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You, Y.F., Xu, C.H., Xu, S.S., Cao, S., Wang, J.P., Huang, Y.B., and Shino, S.Q.: Structural characterization and optical property of TiO2 powders prepared by the sol–gel method. Ceram. Int. 40, 8659 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijhawan, S., Bali, P., and Gupta, V.: An overview of the effect of topographic surface modification of endosteal implants on bone performance and bone implant responses. Int. J. Oral Implantol. Clin. Res. 1, 77 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijhawan, S., Bali, P., and Gupta, V.: The international J of oral implantology and clinical research. Int. J. Oral Implant. Clin. Res. 1, 77–82 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amaravathy, P., Sathyanarayanan, S., and Sowndarya, S.: Bioactive HA/TiO2 coating on magnesium alloy for biomedical applications. Ceram. Int. 40, 6617 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vijayalakshmi, U. and Rajeswari, S.: Influence of process parameters on the sol–gel synthesis of nano hydroxyapatite using various phosphorus precursors. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 63, 45 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, L.L., Xu, J., Lu, X., Munroe, P., and Xie, Z.H.: Electrochemical corrosion behavior of nanocrystalline β-Ta coating for biomedical applications. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 4, 579 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar